Showing posts with label peak oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peak oil. Show all posts

Thursday, April 23, 2026

The end of oil




From The Conversation


US President Donald Trump is a longtime climate denier and oil industry ally, who sums up his own energy policy as “drill, baby, drill”. Yet he is doing more than almost anyone to speed up the global shift from fossil fuels to clean energy and electric vehicles (EVs).

After the US and Israel struck Iran in late February, Tehran closed the Strait of Hormuz and triggered the largest disruption of oil supply in history.

Ironically for Trump and his oil industry donors, this crisis may be an irreversible tipping point for clean energy. For years, fossil fuel advocates spruiked oil, gas and coal as “reliable” energy. That narrative has been reversed. Fossil fuels have become expensive and unreliable, while renewables are cheap, reliable and secure.

For the first time ever, more than 50 nations will gather next week in Colombia to hash out how to wind down and end their dependence on coal, oil and gas. The history-making conference was planned before the Iran war. But this year’s energy crisis has greatly raised the stakes.

The oil crisis is real


Iran’s closure of the narrow Strait of Hormuz stopped oil tankers reaching their destinations. But that wasn’t all. More than 60 gas and oil sites have been damaged in the conflict so far. Even if a durable ceasefire is reached, these impacts will reverberate for months and years to come.

Around 80% of the trapped crude oil was destined for the Asia-Pacific. Faced with dwindling supply, the region’s governments are implementing emergency measures such as sending workers home, banning government travel, rationing fuel and cutting school hours.

The problem is especially bad in the Pacific. Many island nations use diesel for power generation. In response, leaders declared a regional emergency.

Fuel import bills were already a major burden for Pacific nations, leading to efforts to switch to local renewables. Fuel bills could rise by A$933 million in Fiji (nearly three times the healthcare budget).

Scrambling for energy


When energy supplies are disrupted, leaders have three options: find alternate supplies, reduce use or switch to alternatives. In the very short term, countries aim to shore up supply, just as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did last week in Malaysia.

Countries have also moved to reduce use. This can have lasting effects. During the Middle East oil shocks of the 1970s, oil prices tripled and then doubled again. Authorities responded by improving energy productivity to do more with less. The world’s final oil demand per capita peaked in 1979 and has never recovered.

But the real difference from half a century ago is that fossil fuel alternatives are ready for prime time. Since the 1970s, the price of solar panels has fallen 99.9%, while the cost of wind has fallen 91% since 1984. Battery prices have fallen 99% since 1991.

This means it’s now viable for many nations to switch to these alternatives.

The European Union will accelerate electrification, after its fossil fuel bill increased more than $36 billion since February. France has doubled state aid to help households switch to EVs and electrify home heating. Import-dependent South Korea gets 70% of its crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz. It now plans to double renewables capacity within four years.

Electric vehicles at the tipping point?


This year’s oil shock shows signs of creating an unplanned social tipping point – a threshold for self-propelling change beyond which systems shift from one state to another. Climate scientists warn of climate tipping points which amplify feedback and accelerate warming. But social scientists also point to positive tipping points – collective action that rapidly accelerates climate action.

The rush to EVs is a case in point. In Australia, petrol prices surged almost 50% in March, and diesel more than 70%. It’s no surprise new EV sales are at an all-time high, while secondhand EV sales more than doubled last month.

Australia’s 1.3 million hybrid and battery electric vehicles avoid almost 15 million litres of petrol and diesel use every week.

The rush to electric transport is global. Most new Chinese cars are powered by batteries, not oil. Battery electric vehicles outsold petrol cars for the first time in Europe in January.

A conference to quit fossil fuels


The routine burning of coal, oil and gas is the primary driver of the climate crisis. The world’s highest court last year made clear nations have obligations to stop burning fossil fuels.

But fossil fuels have barely been mentioned in 30 years of global climate negotiations, due in part to blocking efforts by big fossil fuel exporters and lobbyists.

Frustrated by slow progress, a coalition of nations has bypassed global climate talks to discuss how to actually phase out fossil fuels.

The first of these summits will take place next week. More than 50 nations will gather in Santa Marta, Colombia, to discuss a potential standalone treaty to manage fossil-fuel phaseout while protecting workers and financial systems.

Colombian Environment Minister Irene Vélez Torres says it comes at the “best possible moment”, as the oil crisis focuses global attention on fossil fuel dependency.

If next week’s summit produces real momentum to wean off fossil fuels amid the energy crisis, we might look back at it as a social tipping point where early adopters move in earnest – and make it easier for the rest of the world to follow.

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

China's green tech exports up 70%

From Jasmin Smajic 


China's exports for the solar, EV, and battery industries reached a record high of $21.9 billion in March 2026, up 70% year-on-year.



Trump's stupid attack on Iran has accelerated the shift to green tech.  And I suspect this is only the beginning.

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Renewables met 100% of global demand in 2025

 From Renew Economy


Record amounts of new solar and wind generation capacity met 99 per cent of global electricity demand growth in 2025, new data shows, as the rise and rise of big batteries helps transform solar into a “round-the-clock resource” – with Australia leading the charge.

According to the Global Electricity Review 2026 from energy think tank Ember, renewable power generation increased by 887 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2025, outpacing electricity demand growth of 849 TWh for the year.

Solar – as noted above – was the big star of the year, with new PV generation meeting 75 per cent of the net increase in global power demand, growing by a record 636 TWh in 2025 to reach 2,778 TWh in 2025, a 30 per cent jump on 2024.

The increase in global solar capacity [output] was 18 times as large as that of gas (+36 TWh), which was the only fossil power source that grew in 2025, Ember says.

A separate report, the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Global Energy Review says the global solar juggernaut contributed the largest structural increase ever recorded in a single year for any electricity generation technology in 2025, and helped renewables outpace coal growth for the first time. 

In the context of the current Middle East conflict, Ember notes that the solar generation added in 2025 would be sufficient to displace gas-fired electricity equivalent to all LNG exports through the Strait of Hormuz in the same year, estimated at 550 TWh. 


Global solar generating capacity [output] has been doubling roughly every three years, Ember says, rising from 1,333 TWh in 2022 and overtaking wind power for the first time globally in 2025. Both solar and wind are expected to overtake nuclear in 2026.

Wind energy, too, had a bumper year according to a separate Ember report, which shows that the global industry installed a record-smashing 165 gigawatts (GW) – or 205 TWh – in 2025, marking the highest ever level of new installations for the wind power industry.

Australia followed the global wind trend, charting 43 per cent year-on-year growth with 1,200 new wind projects coming online in 2025, compared to 835 in 2024 – bringing the total number of wind projects by the end of 2025 to 13,515. 

“Australia recorded a significant increase in wind generation … due to stronger wind conditions and major new wind farms coming online, such as the 412 MW Goyder South wind farm and the 923 MW MacIntyre Wind Farm, Australia’s largest-ever wind farm project,” the report says. 

But Ember notes that fewer projects achieving final investment decision and approval for the coming years, due to planning delays, inflation and community opposition, points to a drop in the future pipeline.

In combination, wind and solar now contribute more than half of all global renewable generation and, combined with nuclear (8.9%) and hydro, low-carbon sources reached 42.6 per cent of total electricity generation in 2025, up 9.1 percentage points from 33.5% in 2015. 

On the other side of the coin, the share of fossil generation fell to 57.4 per cent, down from 66.5 per cent in 2015. This was the first year since 2020 without an increase in electricity generation from fossil fuels and only the fifth year without a rise this century.

For storage, 2025 was also a landmark year, in which battery economics reached a turning point, with battery pack prices for stationary storage falling to a record low of $US70/kWh – down 45 per cent on 2024 – allowing dispatchable solar with batteries to be delivered for around $76/MWh.

“This makes it cheaper and faster to build than a new gas power plant, particularly in countries reliant on expensive LNG imports,” the report says. 


Globally, battery storage capacity additions jumped by 46 per cent from 2024 to an estimated 247 GWh, according to Ember – enough to shift around 14 per cent of global solar generation from daytime to other hours.


According to the IEA, battery storage was the fastest-growing power sector technology in 2025, with the roughly 110 GW of new capacity added over the course of the year beating the largest-ever annual capacity additions for natural gas.

“Battery storage is the fastest growing power technology today,” the IEA says.

“Installed capacity is now eleven times higher than in 2021. Lithium‑iron phosphate (LFP) batteries now account for around 90% of deployments; while less energy‑dense than rival chemistries commonly used in EVs, LFP batteries are typically cheaper and better suited to more frequent cycling. Just five years ago, the market share of LFP batteries in deployments was well below 50%.”

Ember marks 2025 as the year that batteries are “finally moving into the mainstream” to help shift solar power beyond daylight hours and unlock the next phase of solar expansion.

“Batteries have outgrown their initial niche role as a grid stability service and are now core infrastructure designed to store excess daytime electricity and release it in the evening and at night,” the Ember report says.

In this regard, Ember says Australia is leading the world, as one of two countries alongside Chile that could shift more than 50% of the new solar capacity added in 2025 with new battery capacity, transforming PV generation from a daytime solution to “a nearly round-the-clock resource” and the most affordable pathway to meet rapidly rising electricity demand.


“Australia and Chile stand out for adding relatively small amounts of battery capacity in absolute terms, 9 GWh and 4 GWh respectively, but large enough relative to their solar growth to make a material difference,” the report says. 

“Australia shows how batteries can quickly reshape power markets once deployed at scale. In Q4-2025, during the high-value evening peak hours (18:00-20:00) in the National Electricity Market, batteries set prices 36% of the time – doubling from 18% in Q4-2024, displacing gas and hydro as price setters.

So much for renewables leading to higher prices!

“This led to significantly lower price volatility compared with Q4-2024, with average spot prices of around $100 per MWh during 18:00-20:00, less than half of the Q4-2024 average spot prices during these hours. This helped bring overall prices lower, with wholesale prices averaging $50/MWh, a $39/MWh (-44%) reduction from Q4 2024.

These dynamics, says Ember, show batteries are already delivering tangible system benefits by reducing reliance on expensive fossil generation and stabilising prices at the most critical times of day.

“We have firmly entered the era of clean growth,” says Ember managing director Aditya Lolla.

“Clean energy is rapidly redefining the foundation of energy security in a volatile world. It is already helping countries reduce exposure to fossil fuel imports and costs while meeting rising electricity demand.”


 It's clear that emissions from electricity (~30% of total emissions) have peaked.  It's now obvious to everybody, except those who get paid not to see the truth, that reliance on oil and gas is an economic and a strategic risk.  EV sales have risen 50%, as consumers have seen the light, but it must also be self-evident to all in government that it would be far less risky to permanently uncouple economies from oil.  So it is likely that emissions from land transport (~18% of emissions) will peak soon, as EV sales explode.  And governments will force their electricity producers to install more solar and batteries and less gas, to reduce reliance on LNG shipped through the straits of Hormuz.

Also, the oil crisis will most likely lead to a recession, because of a combination of physical constraints on output (for example, Europe has just 6 weeks of aviation fuel left), on confidence (consumer and business) and on incomes (a jump in inflation.)  I lived through the 1973 and 1979 oil crises, both of which led to deep recessions and surging inflation, and this crisis is bigger than those two. In fact, the oil supply shock is bigger than those two combined.  And the consequent fall in oil demand will only be partially replaced as economies recover.  

Emissions have peaked.  Unambiguously good news.

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Solar and wind replacing the Hormuz gap

 From This is Not Cool




This seems like Good news.

Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air:

Global power generation from fossil fuels fell in the first month since the start of the Hormuz closure, with the fall in gas-fired generation offset by large increases in solar and wind power, rather than coal.

The power generation dataset prepared for this analysis covers countries that disclose near-real-time data. The dataset covers 87% of global coal power generation and over 60% of gas-fired power generation.

Total power generation from fossil fuels in countries with near-real-time data fell 1% year-on-year, with coal-fired generation flat and gas-fired generation falling 4%. The dataset covers the world’s largest power markets: China, the U.S., the EU, and India, among others.

Seaborne coal transport volumes fell 3%, to the lowest levels since 2021. The data contradicts widespread expectations that coal power generation would rise in response to the crisis.


This is the first oil crisis where we *have* alternatives.  We can replace imported gas with wind, solar and storage.  We can replace petrol and diesel vehicles with EVs.  What's more, *everybody* knows it.  Governments, companies, individuals.  

Global emissions have peaked.  Oil demand has plunged, and only some of that demand is coming back, and then only in the short term.  How ironic that this is thanks to Trump.

So yes, emissions will rise again, but the next peak will be lower than this one.

(Caveat:  So-called "AI" data centres.)

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

If only we'd switched to EVs faster

 From Ray Wills


World 1.5MBPD oil displaced by EVs in 2024 China in 2025 Oil market not about the 100 mbpd we use, but the 1-2 mbpd YOY change Oil markets break on variations > 1-2MBPD [Highly inelastic demand] China's vehicle fleet electrification has just removed 250ML/day of China's demand - or >1.5MBPD



From The Driven


war highlights how has become the Achilles Heel of the global . EVs have already avoided equivalent of 70 pct of Iran's exports, and could do more.

Saturday, December 13, 2025

China's oil demand to peak in next 5 years

 From Reuters


China's oil demand is forecast to plateau between the years 2025 and 2030, a research group linked to state oil major CNPC said on Thursday, as the rise of electric vehicles slashes demand for gasoline and diesel.

Most of China's incremental demand for oil this year came from jet fuel and petrochemicals, said Haibo Wang, director of oil market research at the CNPC Economics & Technology Research Institute.

Apparent consumption of oil is expected to reach 760 million tons in 2025, up 0.9% on the year, he added, but demand is set to stabilise next year and stay above 700 million tons until 2030. 
Last year the research unit forecast that oil demand could reach 770 million tons in 2025, before gradually falling to 240 million by 2060.

In September, top refiner Sinopec, which is also state-owned, said it expected total oil demand to peak in 2027.

Natural gas demand will peak later, between 2035 to 2045 at 620 billion to 650 billion cubic meters, the CNPC research group added.

It also raised its forecast for oil demand used to make chemicals and new materials to a peak of 290 million tons in 2050, up 57% from this year.

Even though demand for oil for road transport is now falling fast in China, demand for oil for chemicals and plastics will continue to rise.  

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

China's consumption of transport fuels falls 4%

 From a skeet by Lauri Myllyvirta


Quarterly results of China's and the world's largest oil refiner Sinopec: China's consumption of transport fuels (gasoline, diesel and kerosene) fell 4% year-on-year in Jan-Sep, due to the impact of "alternative energy" i.e. EVs, speeding up from 3.6% drop in H1.

Demand for main petrochemicals [however], measured in ethylene equivalent, grew 8% - surging plastics and chemical production continues, with lots of new capacity coming online at the end of the five-year plan. Import substitution plays a part but cannot account for most of the growth.

I've been puzzling over the reported growth in transport fuel production in recent months, which doesn't seem to be accounted for by domestic demand or net exports. The Sinopec data suggests that it's inventory buildup (or  under-reported exports?).

Source: paper.cnstock.com/html/2025-10...

China's emissions have either peaked already, or will soon do so.  In which case, world emissions will also peak.  The decline initially will be small, but it will accelerate because of cheap EVs, solar and batteries.   Our task now is to steepen that curve and to accelerate the replacement of fossil fuels.

Source: Our world in data


 

Saturday, October 18, 2025

Why emerging markets choose EVs

An interesting video by Energi Media





Developing countries are buying EVs because they're cheap, in essence,  2- and 3-wheelers, buses and now EVs have reduced oil demand by 2 million barrels a day from what it would have been.    Petrol and diesel demand is expected to peak in absolute terms in a couple of years, and has already peaked in China.  That will not mean peak oil demand because of air travel and sea transport.  These are sectors where will need to do more to reduce emissions.

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Sodium-ion even cheaper than I thought

I wrote a piece a month ago about CATL's new sodium-ion battery.  The video I link to provided more information, suggesting costs are even lower than I said.

The cost at cell level will be $19/kWh vs lithium-ion phosphate (LFP) of $55-$60/kWh.  CATL expects $10/kWh in a couple of years.  $45/kWh at pack level, less than half the cost of LFP.   Production can be carried out on existing assembly lines, so they don't have to rebuild the entire factory.  Any factory making LFP could pivot to sodium-ion at minimal cost and time.   

They will retain 85% after 3.6 million miles.  I said 80% in my earlier piece; so this is even better, meaning that after 50 years, 75% of the battery capacity will remain.  Their life will be 3-6 times longer than the best LFP packs.  Energy density has dramatically improved.  A year ago it was 120-140 Wh/kg, too heavy for EVs. The new energy density is 175 Wh/kg, better than BYD's current blade battery (160 Wh/kg).  They can be charged and used from -40 Celsius to +70 C.  And they use abundant materials: sodium, aluminium and carbon.  They are maintenance free.  They can be safely transported at zero charge, unlike lithium batteries.  CATL has also developed a pack made up of both sodium-ion and lithium-ion cells, combining the best qualities of both. 

Years ago, the rule of thumb was that if battery pack costs fell to $100/kWh, that would make EVs cost the same up-front as ICEVs (petrol vehicles).   (EVs are already much cheaper to run)  We have shot way past that point.  The introduction of sodium-ion batteries means that ICEVs will no longer be cost-effective, and production will cease.  

But this will also transform the grid.  The cost of storage has more than halved, and will halve again.   Solar is already the cheapest electricity for everywhere except high latitudes, and now it can be combined with enough dirt-cheap storage to provide base-load power.   That probably means 8 hours of storage, but storage will be so cheap that even 12 hours will be perfectly feasible and economic.  High latitudes will still need long-term storage, but when your EV dies, the batteries will still have another 50 years plus of life in them, and then they can be shipped to high latitudes to provide completely free long-term storage.

This spells the end of the fossil fuel economy.   Except for air transport and cement making, everything we now do with coal, oil or gas will be doable with cheap electricity from solar plus sodium-ion storage.

Even in the USA, even with 25% tariffs on imported batteries, the plunge in storage costs means that the EV and storage revolutions will continue.

Sunday, October 12, 2025

The great EV shift: 90% by 2030

 From EVCurveFuturist


What if I told you that even with political setbacks, EVs will dominate car sales by 2030? That’s right—despite recent challenges, the road to mass BEV adoption is still clear. Back in 2019, I projected that global BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle) sales would reach between 90-95% of total vehicle sales by 2030. This forecast was based on several critical factors: technological improvements, cost reductions, increasing consumer acceptance, and strong policy support from major economies.

However, as we move into 2025, new developments have prompted a reassessment of these projections. While my 2024 forecast was accurate—missing the actual NEV (New Energy Vehicle) final sales figure by just 100,000 units—I have now factored in the ‘Trump effect’ when updating my 2025-2030 outlook.

The ‘Trump effect’—including a 25% tariff on imported EV batteries, reduced federal tax credits, and emissions regulation rollbacks—could raise U.S. EV prices by 10% and slow sales growth by 5%. As the U.S. remains a major automotive market, this impacts global adoption, lowering my projection from 95% to 90% by 2030. However, state initiatives like California’s zero-emission mandates and New York’s infrastructure investments may mitigate these setbacks. Local policies can counteract federal headwinds, keeping the BEV transition on track.

Despite the potential challenges posed by the ‘Trump effect’, strong consumer demand, rapid battery innovation, and international momentum for EV adoption persist. Europe and Asia are doubling down on their commitments to electric mobility, driven by emissions regulations and aggressive electrification targets.

Technological advancements continue to lower the cost of ownership, with new battery technologies like LFP and sodium-ion promising even greater affordability and efficiency. Recent insights from ARK Invest suggest that EV adoption is surpassing traditional S-curve dynamics, indicating a more rapid and expansive growth trajectory. As battery costs decline, EVs become accessible to new consumer segments, sparking fresh waves of adoption. ARK’s analysis highlights that, rather than plateauing, EV adoption is accelerating, driven by overlapping adoption cycles as cost reductions make BEVs increasingly attractive to budget-conscious buyers. According to BloombergNEF, battery costs have fallen from $132/kWh in 2022 to $89/kWh today, with LFP batteries already at $50/kWh in China. Coupled with 500KW global fast chargers expected by 2025 (IEA), the cost and convenience of BEVs are set to dominate new car sales.

Emerging markets like Latin America, India, and Africa face challenges with charging infrastructure, but affordable EVs from brands like BYD and sodium-ion battery tech offer potential solutions. A major driving force here is the desire of everyday people to break free from oil dependency and escape the cycle of petrol price gouging. The economic motivation for energy independence is especially strong in developing regions, where fuel costs can take a significant portion of household income. By transitioning to cheap renewables and EVs, these communities can reduce reliance on volatile oil, coal and gas markets, making electric mobility not just a technological shift but a social and economic liberation. These regions, with their growing demand and focus on cost-effective solutions, could have an edge in reaching 90% adoption by 2030 if infrastructure gaps are addressed.

While the consensus often lands around 50% BEV sales by 2030, I project 90% based on the S-curve formula used to model adoption in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. Key factors include battery cost reductions, technological advancements, and the collapse of ICE supply chains. I also foresee that from 2027 onwards, global PHEV sales will begin collapsing. PHEVs have long been viewed as a transitional technology—providing a safety net for those wary of limited range or charging availability. However, advancements in battery density, particularly with LFP and sodium-ion technologies, are rapidly making PHEVs obsolete. As costs drop and range extends, the onboard petrol generator loses its appeal, especially when BEVs offer lower maintenance, running costs, and a simpler powertrain.

From 2027 to 2030, the growth of BEVs will be exceptionally strong for several reasons. First, the maturity of next-gen battery technologies will push prices well below parity with ICE vehicles, making BEVs the obvious financial choice. Second, legacy automakers, facing increasing pressure to electrify, will accelerate their BEV lineups while phasing out hybrids. Lastly, consumer preferences will continue to shift toward pure electric as charging networks expand and EV infrastructure becomes more ubiquitous, reinforcing the idea that hybrids were merely a temporary stepping stone. I wrote more in depth on this subject in Why PHEVs Are Losing Their Shine.

 



[Read more here]

Saturday, October 11, 2025

Have emissions from electricity peaked?

 From EMBER.

Global [electricity] demand rose by 369 TWh (+2.6%) in H1-2025, compared with 731 TWh (+5.3%) in the same period last year. The smaller increase was due to a few factors, including a more measured pace of industrial growth in China and India, but also fewer heatwaves in May and June in India.

In China, demand grew by 198 TWh (+4.2%), compared with a much stronger increase of 326 TWh (+7.5%) in the same period last year.

Despite the smaller rise, the global demand increase in H1-2025 was close to the 10-year annual average of 2.7% for 2015-2024.

In India, demand growth was particularly low at 12 TWh (+1.3%), compared with +75 TWh (+9%) last year when heatwaves drove higher demand. Ember estimates that if weather during May and June 2025 had matched last year’s heatwave conditions, demand growth in India would have been closer to +3%.

The world’s four largest polluters accounted for 81% of the global demand rise in the first half of 2025: China 54% (198 TWh), the US 21% (76 TWh), India 3.3% (12 TWh) and the EU 2.4% (9 TWh).




Solar generation grew by 306 TWh (+31%) in the first half of 2025, its fastest absolute growth on record. If this pace continues, solar is on track to remain the fastest-growing source of electricity for the 21st consecutive year and to outpace wind growth in absolute terms for the fourth year in a row. 

Solar’s global share was 8.8% in the first half of 2025, more than doubling in the last four years, from 3.8% in 2021. In many countries, solar now makes up a considerably higher share of the electricity mix.Several economies set new records. Among the top 20 largest solar generators in absolute terms, seven countries — Hungary, Greece, the Netherlands, Pakistan, Spain, Australia and Germany — generated 20% or more of their electricity from solar in the first six months of 2025.

Hungary led with nearly 30% share of solar generation, ahead of Greece and the Netherlands, which both surpassed 25%, up from just over 10% only four years ago (in the first half of 2021). Meanwhile, based on Ember’s estimate, Pakistan saw the largest increase in share, from 4.4% in H1-2021 to 21.9% in H1-2025. The increase was driven by the rapid adoption of rooftop solar by households and businesses in response to high electricity prices, as reported previously by Ember.

Based on available monthly data, at least 29 countries generated over 10% of their electricity from solar from January to June 2025, up from 22 countries in the same period of 2024 and only 11 countries in the first half of 2021.

China remained the leader in absolute growth terms for the third consecutive year, accounting for 55% (168 TWh) of the global increase in solar in the first half of 2025. The US accounted for 14% (44 TWh), the EU 12% (37 TWh) and India 6% (17  TWh). In contrast, solar generation fell marginally in Japan by 1.4 TWh (-0.4%), partly due to record-high curtailment. Solar also declined slightly in Vietnam (-0.5 TWh, -1.7%).


Solar capacity additions also grew at a record pace, reaching a new high of 380 GW in the first six months of 2025 – 64% more than the 232 GW added in the same period last year. A record surge in May, driven by accelerated installations in China ahead of new pricing rules on 1 June 2025, was a key contributor. Overall, China accounted for 67% of total solar capacity additions in H1-2025.


Renewables overtook coal in the electricity mix for the first time on record, rising by 363 TWh (+7.7%) to 5,072 TWh in the first half of 2025. Their share increased to 34.3%, up from 32.7% in the same period last year. Coal fell by 31 TWh (-0.6%) to 4,896 TWh, with its share dropping to 33.1%, down from 34.2%.




My view on these figures:

The output of solar is rising by 30% per annum, and because solar panels and battery storage keep on falling in cost, that growth rate will continue, and may even accelerate.  This half year, solar output rose 306 TWh over the year, so in H1 2026, it could easily rise by 400 TWh, H1 2027 by 517 TWh, and in H1 2028, by 673 TWh.  Assume there is no acceleration in wind output, i.e., the annual increase in output remains at 100 TWh.   

World growth is likely to pick up.  The switch to EVs is accelerating, and datacentres are gobbling electricity.  Demand growth for electricity will be higher over the next year, and higher still in 2027. But, if world electricity demand rises by, say, 500 TWh in the year to H1 2026 (compared with 369 TWh in H1 2025), this will be satisfied by the increase in renewables supply.  Similarly, in H1 2027, demand could rise by more, say 550 or 600 TWh, and still be met by the increase in output from renewables.  By H1 2028, demand would have to rise by a record 770 TWh for renewables not to match this increase.  And thereafter, renewables will eat more and more deeply each year into generation from fossil fuels.

In other words, emissions from electricity generation have probably peaked.  

Declines will be small initially, but the stronger rise in electricity demand is (partly) to supply electricity for EVs. The decline in emissions from land transport will be accelerating.  

We are at, or are close to, the point where not just emissions from electricity generation, but also total global emissions, are peaking.  This is not a cyclical peak, caused by a recession or Covid.  It is a secular peak.  We have at last started on the long road to zero emissions.  Does that mean temperatures have stopped rising? No, unfortunately.  For that, we would have to cut emissions by at least 90%.  However, we're getting there.   Emissions could halve by 2045, and halve again by 2060. Definitely too long and too slow.  But we are at last on the right road.  Now we must try and bend the curve to get there faster.






Monday, October 6, 2025

Politicians favouring fossil fuels are idiots

 From Professor Ray Wills:

Only excuse for politicians who

  • continue subsidies on costly fossil fuels
  • think nuclear power is cheap
  • claim clean energy is expensive
  • want to end decarbonisation?

Idiots

Only idiots ignore the data

My model projections from 2018, and updated 2025:

Prof Wills wasn't 100% correct in his forecasts back in 2018 (nearly 8 years ago).  On the other hand, he was among the least wrong.  The IEA (International Energy Agency), for example, consistently, year after year, underestimated the growth in renewables, and overestimated the growth in demand for fossil fuels.  I myself thought that emissions from coal peaked in 2018, and instead there was a surge in electricity generation from coal in China.  You can read about my latest forecast that emissions have peaked, here.

2018 forecasts

Wills sees oil peaking in 2027, and coal and gas peaking now.

2025 forecasts

Note that the two charts below show primary energy consumption, which is much more than, say, electricity production, because three-quarters of the fuel burnt to generate electricity or to power an ICEV is wasted as heat.

2018 forecasts

2025 forecasts


You'll notice that Wills doesn't think nuclear will grow:

Most important reason nuclear isn't viable in one graph

Apart from long build, it's expensive electricity, [and] if it's really hot, you need to turn them off


Not to mention that all the lethal by-products. 



Global solar output overtook nuclear output 2025

Global wind output will pass nuclear output early 2028

Now here's where some peeps lose it and call me a loony:

[In] my model projection, renewable[s] will pass fossil fuel primary energy consumption in 2035 

Does that mean that we will have halved emissions by then?  No, because there is still growth in demand.  But each year that the share of renewables rises means that demand growth will be increasingly supplied by renewables.  


Wednesday, September 10, 2025

India's renewable electricity reaches new record

 From Reuters


Clean electricity production in India has surged by 20% to new highs so far this year, giving utilities a rare chance to cut fossil fuel-fired generation and reduce reliance on energy imports for power production.

India's clean electricity sources are also on track to provide a third of its utility electricity for the first time over the next month or so, thanks to record combined output from renewables, hydro and nuclear assets, data from Ember shows.

The steep build in home-grown clean electricity comes just as India faces unprecedented scrutiny over its energy import practices, particularly its heavy reliance on sanctioned Russian oil that has triggered stiff new tariffs from the United States.


Solar output rising exponentially


India also faces pressure to boost imports of U.S. LNG as a means to reduce its trade deficit with the United States, but has steadily reduced its reliance on gas for power as clean energy output has increased.

Continued growth in clean generation - alongside rising homemade production of clean energy tech such as solar panels and battery systems - may help India limit its reliance on foreign-sourced fossil fuels while continuing to expand its overall energy generation.

Over the first half of 2025, India's utilities generated a record 236 terawatt hours (TWh) of clean electricity, data from Ember shows.

That total is 20% more than during the same months in 2024, and allowed utilities to curb generation from fossil fuels by 4% from the year before to around 691 TWh.

A 29% jump in wind generation (to 47.2 TWh) and a 25% rise in solar generation (to 85 TWh) were the main drivers of the advance in clean electricity supplies.

The collective upswing in multiple clean generation sources is leading to clean power grabbing a record share of India's generation mix, which will likely exceed 30% for the months of July, August and September.

 



Over the first half of 2025, total clean generation from all sources was around 24% more than average generation levels from India's clean generation assets during the same months from 2022 to 2024.

If wind and hydro production rise as expected during July, August and September, total clean electricity production in India will smash previous records this year and may set the stage for even steeper cuts to fossil fuel generation going forward.

Given the fast pace of electricity demand growth in India, utilities are likely to continue adding coal-fired generation capacity to the generation system to ensure that overall electricity supplies keep up with consumption.

But with solar and wind capacity expected to continue growing at a faster pace, the share of fossil fuels within India's overall generation mix may be close to peaking, which would mark a major milestone for India's fast-growing energy system.

An established peak in the share of fossil fuels in electricity generation could then trigger a potential decline in fossil fuel imports and use, and reduce the pressure on India to succumb to international pressure on oil and gas import trends.


In this piece, Emissions have peaked, I argued that China's emissions have most probably peaked, because of the extraordinarily rapid roll-out of solar, and the S-curve rise in EVs as a percentage of total car sales.

Europe's emissions peaked in 1990.  They are back at 1965 levels.   The USA's emissions peaked in 2007, and its emissions have fallen to 1987 levels. The UK's emissions peaked in 1973, and are back at 1880 levels.  Japan's emissions peaked in 2013.  

If China's emissions have peaked, then the big remaining emitter where emissions must peak, is India.  And it looks as if India's emissions might be close to peaking, too.  Emissions from fossil fuel electricity generation fell 4% in the first half of this year.   Yet India is booming---the average annual GDP growth rate over the last 5 years was 7%.  In other words, despite high growth, the share of renewables still rose and fossil fuel emissions still fell.  

Global emissions have almost certainly peaked.   And this is at least in part due to the plunge in solar and battery prices, which have moved switching from fossil fuels to renewables from a luxury only rich countries could afford to a necessity where even poor countries are willing to do it.  Global emissions will fall slowly at first, but the decline will accelerate as solar, battery, and EV prices continue to decline.  And when emissions have fallen enough, global temperatures will stop rising.

  




Monday, August 18, 2025

China is becoming the world's first electrostate

 From the ABC, Australia's national broadcaster.


In April this year, China installed more solar power than Australia has in all its history. In one month.

This isn’t a story about Australia’s poor track record on solar; Australia is a global leader. Rather, this shows the astonishing rate at which China is embracing renewable technologies across every aspect of its society.

But don’t make the mistake of thinking this transformation is driven by a moral obligation to act on climate change.

China’s reasons for this are less about arresting rising temperatures than its desire to stop relying on imported fossil fuels and to fix the pollution caused by them.

The superpower has put its economic might and willpower behind renewable technologies, and by doing so, is accelerating the end of the fossil fuel era and bringing about the age of the electrostate.

“The whole modern industrial economy is built around fossil fuels. Now the whole world is moving away from that and that means that we are rebuilding our economy around emerging clean tech sectors,” said Muyi Yang, the lead China analyst at energy think tank Ember.

“Once the new direction is set, the momentum will become self-sustaining. It will make reversal impossible. I think China now has set its direction towards a clean energy future.

“Can you imagine that the Chinese government will say that, oh, we will go back to fossil car, not the electric cars? That won’t happen. That’s not possible … this momentum is becoming so strong.”

It’s hard to communicate the scale of China’s clean technology rollout but it helps to look back to recent history to appreciate the transformation.

China became the world’s factory at the end of the 20th century, manufacturing cheap, low-quality products. This industrialisation modernised the country but also caused widespread environmental damage and drastic air pollution.

The factories were powered by fossil fuels, causing China’s emissions to skyrocket and it to become the largest polluter in the world.


China overtook the United States for top place in 2006, but the US is still responsible for the most emissions historically, at one-quarter of all emissions.

 


Still, China’s pivot to renewables wasn’t just about addressing these rising emissions.

With polluted waterways and acrid city smog long ago becoming their own crises, China had to act. Part of that response, starting a decade ago, was a plan called Made in China 2025, which outlined how it would reshape its manufacturing capability to focus on high-tech products, including the ones needed to address climate change.

The authoritarian regime put the heft of the state behind clean technologies at a scale and pace difficult to imagine in most democracies.

It began to invest in all components for renewables, especially wind, solar, electric cars, and batteries that are used for both transport and energy storage. To do this, it used significant government-funded subsidies, said Ember’s Muyi Yang.

“We all understand that young sectors and technologies need some protection for them to grow. It’s like helping a baby to learn how to walk; initially, you need to support them.

“But I think the logic behind China’s policy support is always clear — this support is not meant to be pumped up indefinitely.”

When China rose to industrial dominance in the 1990s, it realised that it could maximise output by developing hubs where all parts of a supply chain for a product are built in the same region. The same approach was applied to renewables, meaning battery factories were established near car plants, as an example.

“It’s not about subsidies. It’s about sound planning, sustained commitment, and targeted support,” Yang said.

As the Made In China plan unfolded, more and more power was needed to fuel these energy-hungry factories and the lifestyles of the burgeoning middle class. To keep up, China built new coal-fired power stations, even as it was installing more wind and solar.

This “dissonance” between China’s booming renewables and coal has meant China is painted both as a climate hero and a villain.

It’s also meant that emissions kept rising.

[However,] a decade after the Made in China plan began, the country’s clean energy transformation is staggering.

“It’s a really interesting policy because it’s a 10-year plan to become a world-leading clean tech manufacturer, which they’ve outright achieved,” said Caroline Wang, the China engagement lead at the think tank Climate Energy Finance. “They’ve made themselves indispensable in the new kind of global economy.”

China is home to half of the world’s solar, half of the world’s wind power and half of the world’s electric cars.

“In the month of April alone, 45.2GW of solar was added, more than Australia’s total cumulative solar power capacity,” Caroline Wang said.

“China’s renewable capacity has exponentially increased and that has also contributed to the drop in coal, in coal use and emissions. There is now a structural kind of decline of coal.”

That’s already having an impact on emissions:



Recent analysis from Carbon Brief found the country’s emissions dropped in the first quarter of 2025 by 1.6 per cent. China produces 30 per cent of the world’s emissions, making this a critical milestone for climate action.

With its unmatched economies of scale, this dramatic acceleration has also brought down the cost of electrification across the world and made China the world leader in clean technologies. Chinese-made electric cars are becoming more dominant on Australian [and Thai, and Malaysian, And Brazilian ....] roads — something that’s already happened for the solar panels and batteries installed across Australian homes.

“China has successfully helped the rest of the world lower the bar for them to embark on the transition. This makes it easier for many other countries to jump on board,” Ember’s Muyi Yang said.

“The transition has to be affordable, otherwise it will be extremely difficult for many developing countries.”

China’s clean energy exports in 2024 alone have already shaved 1 per cent off global emissions outside of China, according to Carbon Brief, and will continue to do so for the next 30 years.


Caroline Wang points out that this green era has also brought major economic benefits.
“It drove 10 per cent of their GDP last year — just the one industry, clean energy. It’s overtaken real estate, and that says a lot because real estate was the driving force of their economy until a few years ago. But now it’s been overtaken by clean energy,” she said.

China’s renewables expansion is also striking because it could not be more different to the direction of another world superpower, the United States, under the leadership of President Donald Trump.
Casting aside the climate damage it will wreak, the US is in a position to return to its “drill, baby, drill” roots because the country produces more than enough fossil fuels to cover its own needs.

That’s not the case for China. One of the key reasons it has pivoted to electrification is to get away from its dependence on imported fossil fuels. 

“I think there’s some deep strategic thinking … it’s not only about the environmental obligation or international commitment, and it can also not be fully explained by economic benefit in terms of jobs and investment,” Yang said.

“Energy is a basic input for economic activities. Energy security is critical because it’s critical for supporting a functioning economy.”

“China sees the old, the conventional fossil fuel growth model as not sustainable. And it is becoming increasingly unable to sustain long-term prosperity.”

When the world’s economies became hooked on fossil fuels, they became dependent on the countries that could supply them, and the price of fossil fuels increasingly dictated global markets.

“This dates back to issues in the 1970s with the [oil] crisis,” said Jorrit Gosens, a fellow at the Centre for Climate and Energy Policy at the Crawford School of Public Policy at the ANU.

“That’s really when people start to think about energy security, especially when we talk about China.

“China typically is described as very rich in coal, but very poor in natural gas and oil.”

Electrification is changing that, and China — the world’s biggest oil importer — is already weaning itself off with electric cars.

“If you go to Beijing today, you can honestly stand at intersections with four lanes going every way and it’ll be quiet as a mouse. The noisiest thing coming past will be a creaky bicycle,” Dr Gosens remarked.

Last year, crude oil imports to China fell for the first time in two decades, with the exception of the recent pandemic. China is now expected to hit peak oil in 2027, according to the International Energy Agency.

This is already having an impact on projections for global oil production, as China had driven two-thirds of the growth in oil demand in the decade to 2023.

The 20th century was dominated by countries rich in fossil fuels, and many of the world’s conflicts fought over access, power and exploitation of them.

Done right, electrification could change that too, as most countries will be producing their own electricity.

“Even if you have pretty poor-quality natural resources, you can still squeeze quite a bit of electricity out of a solar panel. It’s really changing the geopolitics,” the ANU’s Dr Gosens said.

“Renewable energy is the most secure form of energy that there is because you just eliminate the need for imports.

“But also the cost of it, right? It’s a stable cost. You lock it in as soon as you build it. You know what the price of your electricity is going to be. You get insulated from both those risks if you have more renewable energy.”

For Australia, one of the world’s largest exporters of coal and gas, there is plenty to take from this, with China’s furious electrification paving the way for the rest of the world to follow.

“Even if we have these climate wars here still … we can bicker about how quickly we should transition away from fossil fuels domestically [but] the rest of the world is ultimately going to decide how much they’ll be buying of our coal, gas and iron ore,” Dr Gosens said.

“I think that’s the biggest risk — that we fail to prepare for something and that these changes will be much quicker than we currently anticipate.”

For Climate Energy Finance’s Caroline Wang, it’s in Australia’s interest to be clear-eyed about what’s happening in China.

“I think a gap in Australia and other Western countries is knowledge and understanding. China is a complex country … it’s got good and bad. For the energy transition space, which is full of complexity, there’s a real need, for our strategic national interests, for Australia to understand what is happening in China.”

Finding hope in national self-interest and security might seem strange, but for Wang, China’s transformation makes her more optimistic about the climate crisis.

“This is the world’s largest emitter, the largest population. If they’ve managed to do it in quite a short time — a decade — it’s a kind of achievement that we haven’t seen any other country achieve. And so it’s very inspiring. Seeing that on the ground gave me hope for other countries, including Australia … there are lessons there to be learned.”