Showing posts with label trains. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trains. Show all posts

Monday, March 25, 2024

Locos which keep going when the wire ends

I was doing some research on "bi-mode" or "dual-mode" locomotives, which can use both electric power from an overhead catenary, as well as diesel power.   Diesel-electric locos already use electric engines to turn the wheels: the diesel engine drives an electric generator which in turn drives the wheels.  Why this apparently inefficient arrangement?  Because an electric engine can provide full torque at zero RPM, unlike plain diesel engines, allowing for faster acceleration from stops.  

Locos which can use both diesel and electricity as energy sources are called electro-diesel locos, whereas, locos using a diesel motor to drive an electric generator are called diesel-electric.  Some diesel-electric locos also have a battery to allow for a larger power draw during acceleration.  

Obviously, if the loco is on a stretch of track where there is electric power, then it would make sense to use the electricity available to run the loco's electric engine.  That is exactly what Siemens Vectron Dual-Mode locomotives does.




From Siemens website:

 

Vectron Dual Mode – keeps going where the wire ends

The Vectron Dual Mode is the up-to-date answer to changing route requirements. The dual power locomotives unite the advantages of full-featured diesel locomotives with those of electric locomotives. This combination empowers you to respond flexibly at all times to your traction requirements – so you'll always keep moving, with or without an overhead wire.

Whenever an overhead wire is available, it should be used. Electrical operation is much more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than diesel operation. But because Germany [and the UK, Australia, the USA .....] will continue to have many non-electrified sections of track for a long time to come, many diesel locomotives still run under an overhead wire – without actually using it. This makes very little economic or ecological sense. The Vectron Dual Mode excels in both operating modes, offering a real alternative to diesel-only operation.

Whether you want to react flexibly to unplanned diversions or boost environmental performance in conurbations: the Vectron Dual Mode offers you a wealth of advantages in your day-to-day operations.

With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll handle a wide range of traction tasks much more economically than with a standard diesel locomotive. Every kilometre saves fuel, and thereby reduces energy costs. You'll also reduce the number of hours your diesel alternator set is operating. Altogether, you'll benefit from a reduction in energy and maintenance costs of up to 53%.  [The savings obviously depend on what percentage of the total network is electrified.  On the other hand, diesel locos have to keep running even when they are stationary.  Given that hybrid cars use up to 40% less fuel than petrol cars because the engines don't run when the car is stationary, and also because they recharge their battery as they slow down or go down a hill, significant energy savings appear quite possible, provided the loco also has a battery.]

The issue of environmental pollution is becoming increasingly important in cities and metropolitan areas. With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll make an important contribution to sustainable freight transport. By taking advantage of electricity wherever possible, you reduce carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions. This lets you reduce your annual local emissions by 950t of CO2, 6t of nitrogen oxides and 37kg of particulate matter compared with a standard diesel locomotive – and significantly improve your fleet's environmental performance.  [Again, the percentage of electrified track will alter these numbers.  For example, only 10% of Australia's railway track is electrified.  However, a much larger percentage of track in urban areas and conurbations is electrified, and a larger percentage of total traffic takes place on these networks.  For example, in Victoria, V-Line trains which serve regional and country destinations travel for part of their journey on electrified tracks.  On my journeys from a provincial town 200 kms from the city into the big smoke, half the distance is electrified.]


There is another advantage.  To extend existing electrified sections, installing overhead electric wires has to be done from the edge of the existing electrification to the next station or to a depot, which makes for substantial lump-sum outlays.  In other words, it has to be done in expensive chunks.  With a bi-mode loco, electrification can proceed at, say, 5 kilometres at a time, so that the electrified network can be gradually extended over time.  The loco just keeps going under diesel power when it reaches the end of the wire.  Also, the electrified sectors don't need to be contiguous, as the diesel engine could be used across the gaps.  

A good idea.


See also:

Saturday, March 23, 2024

GWR's New Battery Powered Train

Step by step we move away from fossil fuels in railways. 

 Electrification is overall cheaper on busy lines. To date, diesel has been cheaper on less-used lines, because the higher capital cost of installing third-rail/overhead-wire technology isn't offset by the cheaper running coats of electricity.    

I've talked before about battery-powered electric trains which charge from the overhead catenary when they travel on track with electrification, allowing them to travel some way on un-electrified track. 

 Which of these alternative approaches would be better would depend on distances travelled and how fast overhead catenary-charged batteries can charge.  In Australia, for example, rural towns are much further apart than the towns served by this line in England, which are roughly 5 miles apart.   This would require more batteries, on the train and next to the track, and more charging time.  

An alternative is a locomotive which can run on either diesel or electric power, called "electro-diesel" or "bi-mode"  locos (not to be confused with diesel-electric motors), such as the new trains in NSW (which I know I wrote about here on Volewica, but have been unable to find the article)



Friday, January 20, 2023

First train connection between Ukraine and Romania

 From a Twitter thread by Alexander Kamyshin (railway minister of Ukraine)


Launched the first train connecting 🇺🇦 Ukraine and 🇷🇴 Romania.



Just to remind. Back in August 2022, in the middle of the war, we completed 20km of new track reconstruction. That track was closed for 17 years. We done it in 2 months. And then we waited for another 4 months while Romanian railways completed its part of the job.

 From other tweets in the thread, it looks as if the red section has in fact been completed


We also brought brand new diesel train to the route. Made in Ukraine during the war, btw.


What a beautiful station building!



5 reasons why this connection is important: (1) yet another connection for cargo export. More business for both countries. Vital for 🇺🇦, because cargo export is blood for our economy. Beneficial for 🇷🇴, both railways and #Constanta seaport. Great extension for #SolidarityLanes.



(2) another connection for Ukrainians to the EU. You can change the train in Valea Viseului and travel to Cluj-Napoca where international airport gives you 30 destinations per day, incl. 2 flights to London. Or you can go to Bucharest.

(3) more than 30k Ukrainians live in Maramures county of Romania, which is neighboring Ukraine. We are happy to give them a comfortable connection to visit their friends and relatives in Ukraine.



(4) great opportunity for Romanians to #VisitUkraine. Ski resorts in the winter time or hiking #Carpathians in the summer time. And yes, I'm sure that many Romanians are fine to travel to Ukraine even amid the war.




(5) we have to finish a few more exercises with border control and the customs office, and we gonna give a direct transit route connecting Ukraine with Ukraine via Romania. That's important because of the Carpathian mountains, complicating other ways to connect inside Ukraine.



Actually, there is also 6th reason why this corridor is important, but that's something we never discuss. If you know what I mean. 😎

Crossing the border from 🇺🇦 to 🇷🇴.

 



 

And back home. From 🇷🇴 to 🇺🇦.




The line is "Russian" gauge (1520 mm/4 ft 11+27⁄32 in) which is wider than standard gauge (1,435 mm /4 ft 8+1⁄2 in). You have to change trains across the border. (It might interest you to know that, since Australia has several railway gauges, you also had to change trains at state borders in the past, though these days there are standard gauge railway connections between all the mainland capital cities.) There are plans to build a high-speed network in Ukraine, using standard gauge, connecting with the European high-speed network..

To build this so quickly, and while their country is under attack from Russia, is very impressive.

Also, how beautiful that part of Ukraine is.  I'd love to visit.

Friday, September 3, 2021

Indian Railways to go 100% green by 2030

From PV Magazine

Indian Railways—the nation’s largest electricity consumer, with 2.4% of total consumption, and the third largest high-speed diesel user, with 2.6 billion liters consumed annually—has solarised more than 960 stations till date as it aims to become a net-zero carbon emitter before 2030. Orders have been placed for 198 MW solar rooftop capacity for 550 stations, which is under execution.

Indian Railways plans to install an [additional]  20 GW solar capacity over its vacant land as it aims to meet all of its energy needs of more than 33 billion units [kWh] by 2030 through solar power. The current annual requirement is about 20 billion units.

“About 51,000-hectare vacant land is available with Indian Railways, and it is now ready to extend all support to the developers for installing solar power plants on Railway’s vacant un-encroached land”—read a statement by the Railways ministry.

It may be noted that Railways is also set to achieve 100% electrification by the year 2023 and is committed to utilize solar energy for meeting its traction power requirement.


India produces ± 7% of global CO2 emissions.  Emissions fell last year, but will have rebounded this year. 

Annual change in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in India from 1982 to 2020 (in million tonnes)
Source: Statista


 

Sunday, August 2, 2020

Battery-powered vs fuel-cell trains



From Treehugger.

Just about everyone agrees that the best way to power a train is with electricity from overhead wires; the only problem is that it is really expensive to install. Even in Europe, which is pretty dense and has a great rail system, as much as 40% of the 25,000 miles (40,000 kilometers) of track is not electrified, and on many of these lines, the demand isn't high enough to ever justify the cost, which can be huge. There isn't only the wiring, but often all the bridges have to be rebuilt higher to handle the height of the catenary wires and pantographs on the roofs of the trains.

European governments want to get rid of diesel-powered trains as part of the fight against global heating, so they have been buying hydrogen-electric multiple units (HEMU), which are electric trains powered by fuel cells running on hydrogen.

But there is another player in the game: battery electric multiple units (BEMU) – trains powered directly from giant batteries, which are getting better and cheaper by the day. They are now pushing 75 miles (120 kilometers) in range; Rail Journal quotes Brahim Soua of Alstom, who says “This was not the case several years ago where the level of autonomy was close to 40km. This is thanks to an improvement in the battery’s capability to store more energy for the same mass of battery.” This is good enough range to skip through many non-electrified sections of Europe.

Now Oliver Cuenca of International Railway Journal reports that the battery-powered trains cost 35% less to buy and operate than hydrogen trains. The batteries don't have to be replaced as often as fuel cells, either, so maintenance costs will be lower. Cuenca notes some caveats:

However, the study assumes that only ‘green’ hydrogen made by electrolysis using electricity from renewable sources will be used. In reality, the cheaper so-called ‘grey hydrogen,’ made as a by-product of the chemical and oil industry, will be used in some cases.

The problem is, there is no point in replacing the diesel trains if they run on gray hydrogen, which is made from natural gas and emits 9.3 kg of CO2 for every kg of H2 in the process. The hydrogen-hype people say this is just an intermediate step, that "The plan is that hydrogen will be produced on site via electrolysis and wind energy at a later stage of the project." But as we noted before, "while Germany's renewable electricity supply has grown dramatically, they still get half their power from coal and are closing their nuclear reactors. It will be a very long time before they are making hydrogen from electrolysis."

Unless it was made at night...

"The study also assumes that hydrogen will be more expensive than electricity because electricity is needed to produce the hydrogen in the first place. This may not be true, as electricity used to produce hydrogen generated at night will likely be significantly cheaper due to much lower demand compared with the daytime electricity used when most electric regional trains operate."

Except that if the trains operate during the daytime, they can be charged at night with the same cheap electricity, just like people do with their electric cars. [Well, not quite: most ppl travel less than 100 km per day, while a battery electrc train could do 10-20 tmes that, so will have to charge during the day as well as overnight]And it will store a lot more of that electricity. Hydrogen is a lousy battery; the efficiency of splitting it from the oxygen is now up to about 80%. Then there are losses compressing and cooling it, and then the fuel cell is only about 50% efficient, giving an overall efficiency at the wheels of about 35%. This all might get better with improved technology, but batteries are running at 80% efficiency now[Musk has said that Tesla's batteries were 90% efficient] and they are getting better too. As energy expert Paul Martin notes,

"A technology which uses 3x as much energy as its competitor, at bare minimum, will have a hard time competing—if they share the same energy source. So if H2 is going to be competitive, beware— it won't be "green" hydrogen they reach for. It'll be the only kind you can currently buy—BLACK hydrogen made from fossils without carbon capture. And that's a highly questionable way to "green" a diesel."

See also :Battery-powered electric trains

Friday, May 15, 2020

Battery-powered electric trains

Siemens battery-electric train


Trains are about to go electric.

Battery-electric, that is. While electrical propulsion has been the preferred way to move trains for most of a century, the idea of moving them longer distances via battery is one that’s just now being realized.

Like long-range electric cars, it’s a reality afforded by the energy density and longevity of modern lithium-ion battery packs.

In Germany, where only about 40 percent of track is electrified, the trains will clean the air along routes that might have been impractical or prohibitively expensive to electrify, the state of Baden-Württemberg has ordered 20 two-car trains built in Germany by Siemens, who will oversee energy consumption and energy costs over a nearly 30-year service period.

It’s the first such order for battery-electric trains for Siemens Mobility, who will deliver them by June 2023. In them, a lithium-ion battery pack is mounted under the train’s floor and is charged while it moves along via overhead lines, using them to both power the train and charge the battery. When the train reaches a stretch of rail with no overhead lines, the battery takes over.

The new trains are part of Siemens’ Mireo train platform for regional and commuter rail—boasting weight reductions and improved aerodynamics. Configurations range from two to seven cars, and top speed, depending on the version, ranges from 87 to 124 mph [140 to 200 kph].

Germany and France are two markets that have started investing in battery-electric trains. Last month another company, Alstom, announced that it has a first contract to supply battery-electric regional trains for Germany’s Leipzig-Chemnitz line with three-car trains that can cover up to 75 miles and reach a top speed of 99 mph.

That same company has tested hydrogen fuel-cell power as the alternate source instead of batteries. And the Canadian company Bombardier in 2018 launched the Talent 3, an electro-hybrid train that can cover up to 62 miles on non-electrified track, with a modular approach to configuring motors and batteries.

[From Green Car Reports.  Here are two related articles: First Order for Mireo Plus B Battery, and Alstom signs first contract for battery-electric trains ]

Unfortunately, none of the articles says how long it takes to charge the batteries, or, put it another way, how many k's the train must travel using the electric catenary for each k of travel under battery power.