Showing posts with label Toyota. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Toyota. Show all posts

Thursday, January 30, 2025

AU EV sales start to pick up

 The Labor government, after it took office, allowed EVs to be bought on a novated lease through your employer without having to pay fringe benefit tax.  Too complicated to explain to non-Australians, but in essence it allows you to have an EV on lease at a substantial discount equal to your marginal tax rate plus the 10% general sales tax.  For people on the lowest marginal tax rate (above zero), this equates to a ~30% tax cut.  The introduction of this incentive caused a huge jump in EV sales, followed by a bit of a slump.  This slump was worsened by Tesla sales declining fast, as Tesla has until recently made up most of the sales of EVs.

But over the last few months, the big jump in the number of models available in Oz has led to a rebound in sales.  BYD has just reduced the price on its entry-level EV to below A$30,000.   The cheapest Toyota Corolla starts at $26,400, but that isn't a hybrid.  The cheapest hybrid Corolla is $31,790.   At some point this year, V2H (vehicle to house) charging will be enabled.  Even at the lowest non-zero marginal tax rate, the cheapest BYD will cost just $20K, but will also be a house battery.  A comparable Tesla Powerwall will set you back ~$25K.  However, the bi-directional chargers are still pricey, though even adding that cost to your car still leaves you with big cost savings, especially when you consider how much cheaper EVs are to run than petrol vehicles.  The point about this is that EV price competition continues, and EVs are now very good value, and will get better.   Expect sales to rise fast.


Recent months showing a pick-up, but still down on the 2023 peak


Year-on-year sales growth is back above +30%, after a low of -27%


Friday, June 23, 2023

EVs reach cost parity with petrol cars







BYD has just launched the cheapest EV in Australia --- and it costs the same as comparable petrol cars, even before big tax concessions.




From Drive



Two Chinese automotive giants have sparked a price war aiming to undercut each other to earn the title of Australia's cheapest electric car.

Three days after Chinese brand MG announced a new electric car – the MG 4 – priced from $38,990 before on-road costs, arch-rival BYD has announced its new model – the BYD Dolphin – will start from $38,890 before on-road costs.

When they arrive in showrooms later this year, both vehicles will cost close to or in excess of $40,000 drive-away once registration fees and other charges are added.

The distributor for BYD vehicles in Australia today said the $100 difference in RRP between the two electric cars was a coincidence and the price was "locked in months ago."

Orders for the Dolphin – the second mass-produced model from the Chinese electric-car giant in Australia – opened at 8:00pm AEST on 22 June 2023.

All five electric cars available in Australia for less than $50,000 made in China by three local car brands – MG, BYD and GWM Haval.

There are three model grades: the entry-level Dynamic and the long-range Premium, both due this year, plus the performance-oriented Sport due next year.

About the same size as a Toyota Corolla or Hyundai i30, the Dolphin is almost $10,000 cheaper than BYD's other vehicle on sale in Australia, the $48,011 plus on-road costs Atto 3 small SUV.

It also undercuts the GWM Ora Standard Range from China ($43,990) – and is priced in line with popular petrol-powered hatchbacks including the Toyota Corolla ZR Hybrid ($39,100), Hyundai i30 N Line Premium ($37,300) and Mazda 3 G25 GT ($38,420). All prices listed are before on-road costs.

The entry-level Dolphin is powered by a 70kW/180Nm electric motor and a 44.9kWh battery pack, good for 340km of claimed driving range in European WLTP lab testing, and zero to 100km/h acceleration in a claimed 12.3 seconds.

A more powerful Premium version is available with a 150kW/310Nm electric motor and 60.48kWh battery good for 427km of estimated WLTP range.



There are cheaper petrol cars.  For example, you can buy the Kia Picante automatic for about $18K.

But EVs are exempt from fringe benefit tax (FBT), a tax which applies if your employer provides you with a car as part of your salary package.    This means that if your employer provides you with an EV, your taxable salary is reduced.  You save whatever your top marginal tax rate is.  For many people, that's 32.5%.  But you also save on GST (general sales tax).  It is added to your monthly novated lease cost, but your employer can claim it back off its own GST.  GST is 10%.    So that means that the effective cost of a BYD Dolphin bought through your employer is about $23,000.  Given that the tiniest petrol car costs $18,000 .....  

But wait, what about people who aren't paying income tax?  Well, the way the FBT car deals work is that after three to five years you have the option of buying the car at a reduced value, or of getting a new car on a new lease, in which case, your employer will sell the car.  So the supply of second hand EVs will jump in two years (this FBT concession was started on July 1st last year), as fringe benefit cars get shifted into the second hand car market.  

Of course, this isn't the end of the decline in the price of EVs --- battery costs will go on falling.  But it surely marks the beginning of the end for petrol cars in Australia.   Oil companies, garages, legacy car dealers, all will face falling revenue and a declining market share.  Toyota, for example, doesn't even sell EVs in Australia, yet.   Most service stations don't have EV chargers on the premises, even though their higher margin business is the groceries and stuff they sell in their shops, not the petrol on their forecourts.  They're not paying attention, and it will be very costly for them.



Friday, March 31, 2023

Legacy auto makers face disaster


From The Driven



We are currently witnessing a major disruption in the world’s largest car market, that will have massive implications for the biggest carmakers as they seek to manage the switch from fossil fuel vehicles to electric.

Potentially millions of petrol and diesel cars may about to become unsellable in China as the country implements new vehicle emissions standards, and as EV demand booms. With China already experiencing a car inventory crisis, the next three months could spell disaster for some legacy auto companies.

Auto News recently reported that the China Auto Dealers Chamber of Commerce (CADCC) posted an article on March 23 on WeChat saying that dealers could be left with hundreds of thousands of non-compliant unsellable petrol and diesel vehicles once China’s new emission standard is implemented in July.

According to its website, the CADCC had over 8000 auto dealer members as of 2019.

More details on the CADCC March 23 article – now deleted – were given on the Shanghai Metals Market SSM news site on Monday in post titled Industry Association Appeals for Delayed Enforcement of Imminent China VI B Emission Standards to Tackle Huge Inventory Pressure.

The Chinese metals industry publication is justifiably concerned as the inventory crisis will have massive flow on effects for auto industry metals suppliers.

The SSM article says the deleted document stated that the CADCC had “received reports from many auto dealer groups that the upcoming full implementation of the China VI B emission standards will bring enormous pressure to the survival of auto dealers.”SSM reports that in the document the CADCC appealed for three measures on behalf of the majority of auto dealers.
  1. Postpone the implementation of the China VI B emission standards to January 1, 2024;
  2. Car makers should stop producing new cars that do not meet the China VI B emission standards;
  3. Auto OEMs should allocate existing new cars that do not meet the China VI B emission standards to dealers as soon as possible, and launch sales promotions.
China released its rule for stage 6 light-duty vehicle emissions limits in December 2016, so manufacturers have had 7 years to bring their vehicles into line.

The “China 6 standard” is being implemented in two phases. The first phase, 6a took effect on July 1 2020 and the 6b standard will be implemented on July 1 2023.

The China 6 standard applies to light-duty vehicles up to 3,500 kg powered primarily by gasoline or diesel.

The International Council on Clean Transport (ICCT) says the China 6 standard combines best practices from both European and U.S. regulatory requirements in addition to creating its own.

The ICCT says “China 6b further lowers the limits by about one third to half of the magnitude for NOX [nitrogen oxide] , THC [Total hydrocarbons], NMHC [non-methane hydrocarbons] , PM [particulate matter], and CH4 [methane], on top of the China 6a standard.”

While the inventory crises is hitting Chinese dealerships hard, the biggest impacts will be felt by legacy auto companies who have failed to shift to electric vehicles.

The glut of hundreds of thousands of high polluting vehicles sitting in Chinese dealerships comes as Chinese consumers shift rapidly to EVs. Over 25% of all new cars sold in China in 2022 were electric.

According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), 27 million vehicles were sold in China in 2022, with almost 7 million being EVs. China accounted for around two-thirds of global sales of EVs last year.

Although the inventory crisis is playing out in China, counterintuitively Chinese car manufacturers may actually benefit while foreign legacy auto companies sales plummet in the world’s largest car market.

This is because electric vehicles make up a much higher proportion of the total production of Chinese automakers like BYD, while foreign companies like Toyota and Volkswagen are manufacturing and selling mostly petrol and diesel cars in China.

So it will be predominantly Japanese, German and US carmakers that are hit the hardest by the inventory crisis while Chinese EV companies as well as Tesla will continue to see demand grow.

This trend is already playing out in 2023.

In the first two months of the year, sales of Japanese brands in China have dropped by 40% year-on-year. German and Korean brands have dropped by around 20% while US brands have dropped 12.5%.

Meanwhile, Chinese brands have held steady with losses of ICE sales being offset with increased EV sales domestically.

And this trend is accelerating rapidly. EV output in China totalled 7 million units in 2022, an increase of 97% on 2021, while sales of electric vehicles rose by 93%.

The imminent implementation of new pollution standard will compound this trend even further.

Meanwhile, the two largest automakers in the world Volkswagen and Toyota aren’t even planning on launching mass produced EV models until 2027, which is still 4 years away.

The German and Japanese car giants are also two of the most indebted companies in the world, both with almost $US200 billion of debt and highly questionable valuations on their internal combustion factory assets.

An inventory glut of unsellable vehicles in the world’s largest car market is the last thing these companies need and with ICE vehicles sales plummeting, it’s difficult to see how they will survive.

In Japan, automotive manufacturers and the industries that support them are estimated to employ over 5 million workers. Around 8% of Japan’s workforce.

Because of Japan’s disastrous national hydrogen strategy (largely promoted by Toyota), the nation produces a trivial number of electric vehicles and as a result its addressable market in China is vanishing before its eyes.

With Chinese automakers largely shielded from the impacts of the new pollution standards because of their early move to EVs, it’s unlikely that the Chinese government will delay its implementation.

Its looking like the next few months will be crunch time for the legacy automotive industry.


The surplus stocks in China are likely to encourage steep price discounting and also greater exports.  The plunge in the lithium price is making EVs cheaper.    Tesla, with the highest margins in the EV business (in fact in the car business) wants to expand its market share, and can afford to cut prices.  BYD, the world's largest EV maker will defend its share and will take the fight into Tesla's court by increasing exports.  Expect the price of EVs to reach parity with the price of ICEVs far, far sooner than the consensus has it as China's auto price war explodes into world markets.   And expect legacy manufacturers to struggle and (prolly) fail.  


Source: The Driven



 

Tuesday, March 14, 2023

Toyota faces disaster



From The Driven




The world’s largest automaker made two major announcements last week which signal that it finally recognises that the future is electric. But it may be too little too late for the company that revolutionised manufacturing half a century ago.

The first announcement was that Toyota would develop a dedicated EV platform after its disastrous half-hearted attempt with the BZ4X.

The BZ4X design, which shared its platform with petrol and hybrid cars, meant its first fully electric offering had redundant components that resulted in much higher manufacturing costs compared to Toyota’s “clean slate” EV competitors.

Japanese newspaper The Asahi Shimbun reported Toyota doesn’t expect to launch its EV range until 2027-28. At the rate at which global EV market share is growing, Toyota will be lucky to retain a tenth of its 10 million unit market share in major market on that timeframe.

The second announcement made last week was that Toyota’s CEO, Akio Toyoda will stand down in April to make way for a new generation for the company.

“The new team can do what I can’t do,” he said in a statement.  ”I now need to take a step back in order to let young people enter the new chapter of what the future of mobility should be like.”

The grandson of Toyota’s founder Kiichiro Toyoda, Akio has received a barrage of criticism in recent years for his failure to identify the world’s shift to EVs while pouring billions of dollars into white elephant technologies like hydrogen.

In the 1970s, Toyota led a manufacturing revolution that changed the world. 50 years on and the automotive giant has grown complacent, taking its market dominance for granted and developing a false sense of security.

In 1991 a group of MIT researchers published a book called “The Machine that Changed the World”. The book was the result of a five-year, five-million dollar research project to identify and understand key manufacturing principals that had enabled Japanese automakers to dominate their US and European rivals since the 1970s.

Engineering students around the world are encouraged to read the book as it provides an excellent history of automotive manufacturing, from Henry Ford’s development of mass production through to the lean manufacturing revolution which forms the basis of modern advanced manufacturing around the world.

You can’t talk about modern manufacturing without talking about Toyota and the 100 year Toyoda dynasty.

Born in 1867, Sakichi Toyoda, considered the “father of the Japanese industrial revolution”, reinvented the loom, dramatically increasing its productivity and set up factories to sell his inventions to the world.

Sakichi’s son Kiichiro Toyoda then expanded the family business to automotive manufacturing and founded the Toyota Motor Corporation in 1937.

In 1967, Kiichiro’s cousin and mechanical engineer Eiji Toyoda took over the presidency of the company and with Toyota’s chief engineer Taiichi Ohno, is largely credited with the development of lean manufacturing principals including the “Just-in-time” Kanban system, “Kaizen” continuous improvement and 5S organisational housekeeping.

These developments lead to a step change in innovation and productivity in the Japanese automotive ecosystem and enabled Toyota to dominate the global car market for the next 50 years.

At the time, US and European carmakers had to scramble to learn and copy Toyota’s manufacturing methods or face wipeout. Projects like the MIT study enabled them to make the necessary changes and survive.

A disruption like the one Toyota inflicted on US and European carmakers in the 1970s is now about happen to Toyota itself, but with one important caveat. While US and European carmakers were able to survive the lean manufacturing revolution, Toyota could struggle to survive the current disruption which is now well underway.

The disruption, which seems to have been largely undetected by Toyota’s top executives, is the exponential growth in market share of electric vehicles coupled with China attaining a new stage in its industrial transformation.

Nothing articulates the challenge Toyota faces better than some recent key figures. In December, fully electric vehicles made up 33% of all new car sales in Germany and the UK, up from less than 10% in both markets just 2 years earlier.

In China BEVs made up 25% of the market in December 2022. Up from just 5% in 2020.

What these numbers reflect is that technology shifts don’t happen in a linear fashion and that once certain market thresholds are reached, growth can accelerate dramatically. In the case of Germany and the UK, EV share was below 5% for ten years but once that share reached 5-10%, it then grew rapidly to a 33% in just 2 years.

And that speed of market share growth is getting even faster. In Norway, which has lead the world in EV growth, it took three years for EV market share to go from 12% (2014) to 32% (2017). The much larger German and UK markets saw an even faster uptake over just 2 years from 7% (2020) to 33% (December 2022).

Automotive manufacturing is incredibly complex and it’s much easier and faster to scale up existing production than it is to develop new production lines for new products.

Therefore as global EV demand surges its much easier for companies like Tesla and BYD, who already produce EVs in high volumes, to scale up their existing production to capture that new demand than it is for companies who don’t already produce EVs at any significant volume.

This is a major problem for Toyota where EVs make up just 0.2% of total production. Despite being the largest automotive manufacturer in the world, Toyota doesn’t even make the top 20 when it comes to EV production.

By October, Toyota had only sold around 14,000 BEVs globally in 2022. An annualised production rate of less than 20,000. For comparison BYD produced 911,140 BEVs in 2022. Tesla produced 1,310,000 around 650 times more fully electric vehicles than Toyota.

One third of new car sales in Germany and the UK are now fully electric vehicles. That equates to Toyota losing almost a third of its addressable market in those countries in just a few years. This could climb towards 50% by the end of this year.

BEV sales in Norway went from 30% market share in 2018 to 80% in 2022. That’s 50% of the market in just 5 years. If the global EV market share follows a similar S-curve, by the time Toyota launch its EV range in 2027-28, over 50% of the world’s car sales will be BEVs and virtually none of those will be coming from Toyota.

Cathy Wood, from Ark Invest, forecasts an even more dire situation for Toyota. She predicts that fully electric vehicle sales will reach 90% of global car sales in 2027 as consumers become aware of the shift taking place, causing demand for petrol and diesel cars to collapse completely.

In that scenario, Toyota will have little to offer to a rapidly changing market, but would be just one of many problems facing Toyota. The company is one of the most indebted companies in the world with $US170 billion in current liabilities on its most recent balance sheet.

On the asset side of the ledger, Toyota is showing $US215 billion in property, plant and equipment. These assets are largely factories that produce internal combustion engine vehicles which the world is rapidly moving away from.

These asset valuations assume that Toyota will maintain its 14% share of the $US3 trillion global car market.

As EVs continue to take large chunks of market share away from 19th century ICE technology, Toyota’s ICE factory valuations are going to become impossible to justify.

Like coal and gas power plants, Toyota’s ICE factories are stranded assets. The ramifications of this will be enormous, especially for Japan whose economy is dominated by ICE vehicle exports.

Decreasing sales from a vanishing addressable market will mean Toyota will find it harder and harder to service its debts. A vicious circle right when Toyota needs to spend billions developing EV production.

Can Toyota perform a miracle pivot to EVs?

Tesla is the fastest growing car company in history.

In 2013 Tesla produced 22,477 electric vehicles which is roughly the same number of BEVs Toyota produced in 2022.

When discussing production growth during an interview with Financial Times in May 2022, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said “Our growth rates are faster than any large manufacture production in the history of the earth, We're faster than the (Ford) Model T”

Scaling automotive production is hard. Even with record production growth rates it took Tesla 9 years to go from 22,000 to 1 million EVs per year.

So even if Toyota is somehow able to match Tesla's production growth rate on BEVs, it would only hit 1 million EVs by 2031, by which time many analysts believe the global car market will be 100% electric.

Toyota currently produce around 10 million petrol and diesel cars per year.

If the predictions about EV market share growth are accurate and if Toyota is somehow able to reach an annual production rate of 1 million EVs by 2031, it would still result in a 90% drop in sales for Toyota.

50 years ago Toyota spearheaded a manufacturing revolution that enabled it to become the world's largest automotive manufacturer.

It's difficult to see how Toyota will survive the electric vehicle revolution.



 

Tuesday, November 2, 2021

Toyota gives in

For several years now, Toyota has refused to sell full-electric cars.   The company was the first to produce a hybrid (the Prius) and have fiddled for years with trying to create a hydrogen fuel-cell car.  But the success of their competitors has finally persuaded Toyota to produce an EV.  The world's largest car makers, VW and Toyota are now (soon will be) producing EVs.  EVs have gone mainstream.

From The Guardian

Toyota has released details about its first mass-produced electric vehicle in a significant step for the world’s second-biggest carmaker.

The bZ4X is an SUV with optional rooftop solar panels that will be sold in both front-wheel or all-wheel-drive variants.

The public had its first look at the concept for the bZ4X – “bZ” stands for “beyond zero” – at the Shanghai motor show in April this year, but Toyota only published the details of the car on Friday.

The announcement is a step forward for Toyota, which has been slower to move into purely battery-powered electric vehicles than its competitors, relying heavily on hybrid technology instead.

While the car isn’t Toyota’s first electrified vehicle – that title was held by the short-lived RAV4 EV – it marks the first electric vehicle that will directly compete with industry rivals such as the Hyundai Ioniq and the Tesla Model Y.

Toyota already produces the second-generation Mirai, an electrified vehicle powered by a hydrogen fuel cell.

The bZ4X will be launched in Europe on 2 December, with orders to be placed by reservation. It is expected the model will enter series production from the middle of next year across “all regions worldwide” – though the precise timing, price and variants available has yet to be released. Toyota expects this will form an extended range of 70 electrified vehicles by 2025.

Subaru helped developed the vehicle and is expected to reveal its own EV model next year.

It is anticipated the bZX4 will arrive in Australia by late 2022. As Australia’s most popular car brand, it is expected the model will help Toyota take a dominant position in the country’s growing electric vehicle market, as its competitors have been put off by a lack of clear political leadership in making the transition.

Hybrid vehicles accounted for nearly a third of Toyota’s total sales in Australia this year. The bZ4x will be the first of 15 planned zero-emissions vehicles offered by Toyota, including seven bZ models.

Both variants will have a top speed of 160km/h, and will come with a 71.4kWh battery offering a range of roughly 500km. Toyota says the 150kW DC charger will allow the batteries to be recharged to 80% in 30 minutes.

Solar panels can be built into the roof for use while driving or when parked. Toyota says these panels will add an extra 1800km of driving distance each year, while allowing the car to be charged when parked or where there are no charging stations easily available.

Toyota BZ4


Toyota BZ4 interior





Friday, July 23, 2021

Solid state batteries

 A very interesting (as ever) and informative video from Just Have A Think, this time about solid-state batteries.  

Solid-state batteries will charge 6 times faster, will have 3 times the energy density, will weigh less and be safer than standard lithium-ion batteries which have a liquid electrolyte.  The only problem is that producing large solid-state batteries has proved difficult.  But it looks as if, finally, large solid-state batteries might become available, with Marata and Toyota both starting mass production of these batteries later this year.




Monday, July 5, 2021

EVs price competitive with petrol by 2023

 Ray Wills, an Ozzie futurist, has long had as optimistic forecasts as Tony Seba for battery and EV cost declines and EV take-up rates.  Both their forecasts have turned out to be on the mark, while other more conservative forecasters, including BNEF, have underestimated just how rapidly EVs are going to gain market share.


From The Age

Electric cars will hit price parity with petrol by 2023 and be the only cars produced by 2026, while many city petrol stations will be obsolete within a decade, says a Perth 'futurist'.  Ray Wills is managing director of advisory firm Future Smart Strategies, which examines the growth of commodities in the marketplace.

Professor Wills, who is also a board member of remote energy services provider Horizon Power and former chief executive of the Sustainable Energy Association of Australia, said anyone thinking of buying a car would be well advised to wait a few years if possible.

“The future is coming faster than we think,” he said.  “And when it arrives, we always say it was faster than we thought.”

Future Smart had been modelling since 2012 and its models had been “robust” since 2014, he said.  It also “post-casted”, evaluating previous performance.  In 2015, Future Smart Strategies projected 1.85 million EVs would be sold globally in 2018; it turned out to be 2.02 million.

Professor Wills said his models, while more aggressive than those of traditional forecasters such as Bloomberg and Deloitte, were less so than his nearest neighbour in approach, Stanford University’s Tony Seba, who had estimated EVs would be the only vehicles produced by 2025.

He said the disruptive power of electrics was visible in their eclipse of hybrids: for the past decade, 1.5 million hybrids had been sold. More EVs than that were sold in 2018 alone.

“When you see a disrupted market, it’s the thing that has the momentum that rules the day,” he said.  “Nobody will ever be exactly right. But I have been labelled as a futurist and the art of a futurist is to be the least wrong.”

Professor Wills said last year, the global car industry announced a total $400 billion investment into EVs and in addition so far this year, another $100 billion forward investment up to 2025. Volkswagen had announced in excess of $40 billion. Even Toyota, a “laggard” until recently, in May announced a $20 billion forward investment on EVs and advanced plans for electrification by five years.

“Is there a factory specially set up for Australia? No. Australia will buy what the world builds,” he said.

“Electrification as I see it will be virtually complete by 2026, the only cars built in my opinion will be electric, with the exception of some specialist bespoke vehicles.”

He said the average age of the 18 million cars in the Australian fleet was 10 years. He predicted 5 per cent of them would be replaced by EVs by the early 2020s, 50 per cent by 2036 and almost all of them by 2046.  Currently the cheapest EV in Australia was the Nissan Leaf, costing $50-70,000, and while there was no doubt that people would wait until EVs were affordable to buy one, he said by 2022-3 they would be in the $20,000 range.

While still dearer than a comparative petrol car, they would save $1000 per year on fuel costs which would outstrip the additional initial outlay within two years, he said.  Professor Wills said the only car market in Australia growing was EVs; petrol car sales had stalled for 18 months and while economic conditions were part of it, he believed there was more to it than that.

“It’s seen with iPhone models ... we will hold on to the old one if we know a new one is coming," he said.  “People are thinking, I will wait and see what happens. Once EVs are here combustion [car] prices will fall ... at some point they will become unsellable and that’s the point people won’t want to get caught in. It’ll be like buying a flip phone. People will know there’s a better option.”

He said anywhere you could plug in a hair dryer, you could plug in an EV.

"On the street you’ll need a little infrastructure,” he said.  “[But] it’s not an NBN rollout ... it’s not a $40 billion project, more like a $4 billion project.”

Petrol sales would thus be eroded and Australia would generate electricity for cars using local, renewable energy power plants, freed of the need to import $15 billion annually in oil and oil products for motor cars.

“Over the past 20-30 years, as we’ve gone to a self-serve petrol station then pay at pump, we lost all the corner store type stations ... replaced by the big main road stations,” he said.

“Next step will be a rationalisation of larger volume petrol stations. In the 2020s you will see some older petrol stations closing instead of being upgraded. The biggest ones will be the best protected and as the petrol and diesel market is eroded you’ll see the attrition of the outlets, just as the internet has eroded retail sales.”

On regional highways and national highways they would continue to operate as fast charging points.

“Australians will still have “range anxiety”, it’s prevalent here because of the distances, but there are already vehicles that can do 400 miles without a charge, and most of us can’t do that without a pee,” he said.  “You’ll need to recharge yourself before you’ll need to charge that car. Right now, 150KW is less than an hour; a stop for a tea, a pie and a tinkle.”

Key to the puzzle would be the arrival of electrified trucks, he said, and that would be a clearer situation within two years.  China was rolling out all buses, trucks and taxis to be electric, both for energy efficiency and air quality; building 181 electric buses per day. Australia had 36 electric buses in operation, by comparison.


The Tesla Model 2 US$25K hatchback



Monday, June 22, 2020

Achieving a 50% cut in emissions

Toyota RAV4 plug-in hybrid, with 60 k's of electric range


This is from a comment I wrote about a piece in Melbourne's The Age newspaper.  It's specifically about Australia, but the same forces are operating everywhere.  A 50% cut in emissions by 2035 is easy.  The next 50% (to be achieved by 2050) might be a little harder.

In 2009, new-build solar cost 3.1 times as much as new-build coal (US data, Lazard). Now it costs 1/3rd. The ratio has completely inverted. In fact, in several countries, new-build wind and/or solar are cheaper than the *operating* cost of coal power stations. In other words. it costs more to dig up, transport and burn the coal than it does to build a new wind/solar farm from scratch. The implication is that for *economic* reasons, coal power stations are going to be closed down over the next decade. The government could, were it not a wholly-owned subsidiary of coal companies, make a virtue of the inevitability of this. "See, we're cutting emissions by a third! Aren't we green! We really care!"  Not that they do, of course.

What about the variability of wind/solar? Three points:


  1. Wind and solar are complementary, in fact negatively correlated. The wind often blows when the sun doesn't shine, for example during winter in southern states. So a 50/50 wind+solar powered grid has an output profile much closer to baseload than either by itself.
  2. A continent-wide grid produce much less variable output than a local one. When the wind isn't blowing in western Victoria, it is in east Gippsland. When it's raining in Sydney, it's sunny in Broken Hill or Port Augusta.
  3. Battery cost are plunging. Over the last 30 months, they've fallen 60%, even after the cost impact of the fall in the A$. Storage costs are falling fast, which means the costs of "firming" the grid are too. It is now normal in the US for new solar farms to come with 4 hours of storage. As battery costs continue to slide--they should halve again over the next 3 years--solar farms will add even more storage to allow them to provide power overnight (o/n demand is 2/3rds of day demand, so in principle, 8 hours of storage will be enough)


One final point. Already simple hybrids cost only $1500-$2000 more than their (automatic/CVT) petrol equivalents (for example, the 2020 Toyota Corolla sedan), but they use 40-50% less petrol in urban driving. If your fuel bill is $100 per month, the higher cost of the hybrid engine will pay for itself within 3 years. And transitioning our vehicle fleet to simple hybrids will cut total emissions by another 10% (transport emissions are ~20% of the total.)  Plug-in hybrids are even more fuel efficient, cutting tailpipe emissions by 80% plus.  They cost just a couple of thousand dollars more than an ordinary hybrid.  A small tweak to the tax system could cut emissions from transport by 75%.

By 2030 or 2035, we could cut emissions by 50%, at no extra cost to ourselves. And look good while doing it.  But our conservative government is so beholden to fossil fuel interests that it cannot bring itself to acknowledge this.

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Electric vehicle sales triple in Oz

From The Guardian:

Electric vehicle sales in Australia more than tripled last year but were still far lower than in a majority of developed countries, industry data shows.

The Electric Vehicle Council says 6,718 full electric and hybrid plug-in vehicles were sold in 2019, up from 2,216 the year before. Sales of combustion engine cars fell 7.8% over that period.

The release of the industry group data follows Britain this week announcing it would ban new petrol, diesel and hybrid cars from 2035. The Electric Vehicle Council said the spike in sales in Australia from a low base suggested consumers wanted the technology despite it being yet to receive the support offered elsewhere.

“The good news is that the number of Australians buying EVs is surging despite a lack of government incentives or support,” the council’s chief executive, Beyhad Jafari, said. “The bad news is that even with this strong growth, EVs still only represent 0.6% of sales. That compares poorly with 3.8% of sales in Europe and 4.7% of sales in China.”

Support for EVs was a significant point of difference between the major parties at last year’s federal election. Labor promised a target of 50% new car sales being electric by 2030.

The prime minister, Scott Morrison, accused the opposition of wanting to “end the weekend” by forcing people out of four-wheel drives, while the minister for small business, Michaelia Cash, told tradies only the Coalition would “save their utes”.


[Read more here]

Note that these data do not include simple hybrids (HEVs), which are making up an increasing portion of sales:

Customer deliveries of Toyota’s hybrid electric vehicles in 2019 are on forecast to be well in excess of 20,000 vehicles, doubling the total of 11,590 hybrid vehicles sold in 2018.

Hybrid deliveries this year are expected to exceed 10 per cent of Toyota’s overall sales, up from 5.3 per cent last year and 3.9 per cent in 2017.

In the first fourth months of this year, sales of Toyota’s hybrid vehicles have risen by 85 per cent compared with the same period a year ago.
The 2019 tally of 5,613 hybrid cars represents almost 8.7 per cent of the brand’s total sales and compares with 3,029 hybrid cars or 4.4 per cent of sales at the same time last year. In April 2019, Toyota sold 1,458 hybrid vehicles or 9.6 per cent of its total sales for the month.

Hybrids account for almost half of all Camry sales this year (45.4 per cent), up from 39.6 per cent last year and 20.7 per cent in 2017.

A similar trend has emerged for Corolla, with hybrid variants now comprising 31.4 per cent of 2019 sales compared with 12.5 per cent last year and 5.8 per cent in 2017.


[Read more here]

There are no easily accessible data for EV sales in OZ, but this (old) chart from RenewEconomy shows how sales have progressed since the introduction of the Nissan Leaf in 2011.  Again, these data exclude hybrids.  Sales of 6700 (but including plug-in hybrids) in 2019 is a big jump on the 1400 in 2016.   Sales of cars with an electric engine (EVs, PHEVs, HEVs) are likely to double every year from now on.



The pattern, duplicated across many countries, is clear.  Petrol/diesel sales are slumping, prolly because consumers are waiting to buy an EV/PHEV/HEV, while sales of cars with some sort of electric engine are exploding.  And many consumers are settling for HEVs because EVs are still too costly but with a hybrid, they can still cut their greenhouse gas emissions as well as their petrol bills

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Cutting car emissions by 50%. Cheaply & cleanly




Let's look at the petrol (gasoline) consumption and pricing of the Toyota Corolla Sedan Hybrid compared with the petrol-only ("un-electric") version of the same car.  I've taken the data from CarAdvice's review:

While stop-start drudgery wasn’t a part of the program, a mix of open road and some heated pedalling through the fun stuff delivered decent fuel consumption results. Toyota suggests the petrol auto is capable of 6.0 litres per 100km, while we saw 8.0L/100km. The hybrid offers an official 3.5L/100km (better even than the 4.2L/100km hatch), but in the real world ended up at 4.0L/100km. [That's 29 MPG for the un-electric and 59 MPG for the hybrid.]
In terms of equipment, none are missing anything, but of course the range of features and trinkets grows as you step up through the range.

Crucially, all variants come with safety kit including autonomous emergency braking with pedestrian detection (day and night) and cyclist detection (day), seven airbags, lane-departure alert with steering assist, road sign recognition, active cornering assist, two ISOFIX and three top-tether child seat mounts, and a reverse camera.

Automatics feature lane-trace control for more accurate lane centring and all-speed cruise control. The manual Ascent Sport has ‘high-speed’ adaptive cruise (from 30km/h and up) and misses out on trace control. The SX and ZR also pick up blind-spot monitoring.

Pricing starts from [A]$23,335 for the manual, [A]$24,835 for the petrol CVT [Continuously Variable Transmission], and [A]$26,335 for the hybrid (before on-road costs).

This will prolly be the car I buy.  I have a Toyota Corolla Sedan now, and I like it.  Getting a hybrid will only cost A$1,500 more, and I will cut my petrol bill by 50%.  It will pay for itself within 3 years.  My only complaint is that it is so ugly.

But the key point is this: we can transition to hybrids and cut emissions by 50% for very little.   As I said here, EV-promoting policies such as subsidies and EV targets should not discriminate against hybrids.  Although they only cut emissions by 30-50%, because the cost difference is so small they are much more likely to be taken up by consumers than full-on electrics.  Which means we get a real cut in emissions immediately, without having to wait for EVs to have sticker prices below ICEVs.  And when battery prices do fall enough, the transition from hybrid to electric will be seamless and natural.  It'll simply become cheaper to put in a decent battery pack with a single (electric) engine than to have two engines with a much smaller battery pack.   If you think it'll take a long time for manufacturers to transition to hybrids, consider this: 2 years ago, Hyundai had no electric cars at all in its line-up.  Almost all manufacturers now have HEVs and PHEVs as part of their offering.  Governments everywhere could reach 100% electric car sales within a couple of years, at low cost, if they're prepared to accept hybrids as a bridge to full electrics later this decade.

We have to cut emissions and we have to cut them now.  HEVs aren't perfect, because they still produce CO2 and pollution.  But waiting for the perfection of EVs means big delays, which we can't afford.  And in the meantime, we can cut our car fleet's emissions by 30 or 40 or 50%.


Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Toyota's biggest selling hybrid isn't the Prius





The top-selling Toyota hybrid vehicle in the U.S. over the past year wasn’t part of the Prius family.
In 2019, the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid wins that crown. According to Toyota’s 2019 year-end sales summary, released Friday, Toyota sold 92,525 RAV4 Hybrid SUVs to U.S. buyers in 2019, versus just 69,718 Toyota Prius Liftback models.

Going all the way back to the debut of Toyota’s hybrid system in the 2000 Prius, it's the first year that another hybrid model outsold the Prius.

It’s not clear, of course, whether this is Toyota’s doing, via deciding product mix, or a matter of consumer demand for hybrids in one form waxing and another waning. But the concern about the Corolla Hybrid cannibalizing Prius sales wouldn't have helped it take the lead; Corolla Hybrid and Prius sales combined (including Prime) still didn't add up to RAV4 Hybrid numbers.

Long ago, Toyota stated clearly that its intent with its hybrid system was to move it from the niche Prius into its mainstream lineup and “go big” with it there, while the Prius would continue to be a technology harbinger in other ways, if it continued.

Toyota just hasn’t moved the Prius on to the next logical step—which might be a plug-in hybrid with an especially long electric range, or perhaps a vehicle that gets aggressive with solar supplementation. While there’s a plug-in Toyota Prius Prime model in the sidelines, there’s also a 2021 Toyota RAV4 Prime model on the way later this year—with considerably more electric miles.

With RAV4 sales of all versions totaling 448,071 in 2019—the top-selling model in Toyota’s entire lineup—that also figures to hybrids making up more than 20 percent.

I was surprised by how small the cost difference between the RAV4 and its hybrid sister was—just US$2200.  The hybrid version gets 41 mpg (5.7 litres per 100 km) vs about 25 mpg for the petrol version (9.4 litres per 100 km). (Some reports give lower mpg for the hybrid RAV4.) This means that if you want to make a difference to your carbon footprint, you can buy the hybrid version of the RAV4, reduce your carbon emissions, and over the life of the car save money. 

Even better, Toyota plans a plug-in hybrid version later this year.  It seems Toyota has finally decided to hedge its bets about hydrogen fuel-celled cars, and start introducing electrified versions.  This will allow you to charge your car up overnight in the garage, use mostly electric power for the day's driving, but also have the range for long distance.  Unless you can spring for a Tesla, this makes a lot of sense for those of us who want to reduce our emissions.  I'll probably be buying one myself.  One day.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Model 3 cheaper than Toyota Camry

From CleanTechnica:

To regular readers of this column, it will be no surprise that Tesla’s Model 3 is cheaper on a total cost of ownership basis than competing luxury sedans from BMW and Mercedes, but a Toyota Camry? Model 3 is a state-of-the-art electric vehicle with a 5-star safety rating and a driving experience that’s gotten rave reviews from every auto mag under the sun. Is it possible that it’s even in the same price class as the entry-level, reliable-but-dull Camry?

That’s the surprising conclusion of Loup Ventures, a tech-oriented venture capital firm, which performed a 5-year comparative cost of ownership study. Loup first compared the two vehicles in 2017, and concluded that Model 3, which had a purchase price about 40% higher than that of the Toyota Camry LE, would end up costing 13% more to own and operate over 5 years. Considering that Model 3 includes Autopilot capability, over-the-air updates, and a host of other features that you won’t find on the Camry (or any other Toyota), the Tesla still sounded like a pretty good deal.

Now Loup has updated its comparison. Using 2019 figures, the new study reached the astonishing conclusion that, when all relevant factors are taken into account, Model 3, which is indisputably a superior car, is slightly cheaper to own and operate over a 5-year period than Toyota’s mass-market sedan.

When it comes to the purchase price (which, unfortunately, is the only number many car buyers will look at), the Camry still wins hands down. In fact, the price gap has widened to 59% since 2017 — the cheapest Model 3 you can order online is $38,990 (a $35,000 version is theoretically available by special order), whereas the Camry LE starts at $24,600.

Costs for fuel and maintenance are far lower for any EV, compared to a legacy vehicle — Loup projects that Model 3 owners will save almost six grand on fuel and $2,800 on maintenance over five years, compared to Camry drivers.

However, it’s the comparative resale values of the two cars that closes the deal for the Tesla. As even a brief perusal of the pre-owned vehicles on sale will show, Teslas retain their value extremely well. Loup estimates that, after five years, the Model 3 will still be worth almost $19,000, whereas the Camry will fetch only $9,000. When the resale values of the two vehicles are included in the calculation, the cost per mile for a Model 3 comes out to $0.46, compared to $0.49 for the Camry LE.


[Read more here]

The key reason the resale value of the Model 3 holds up so well these days is that it's obvious that Tesla's batteries will last longer than the car.  Plus, people want EVs, and a second-hand Tesla allows you to buy a high-quality car for less than you'd pay for a new EV.

Oh, and comparing the Model 3 to its peers?  The petrol-driven Audi A5 is nearly twice as expensive, per mile.



Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Managing scarce batteries

From Green Car Reports:

Per kilowatt-hour of battery capacity produced and installed in plug-in vehicles, hybrids deliver 14 times the benefit in emissions reductions that pure electric cars do, according to British analytics firm Emissions Analytics.

In European terms, the company measures the grams of carbon-dioxide saved per kilometer of driving, per kilowatt-hour of battery installed in the car.

The company considered 153 cars, including 59 conventional full hybrids, 7 mild hybrids, and 57 plug-in hybrids, and compared them to a theoretical electric car with a 60-kwh battery pack. It included vehicles in Europe and in the U.S., and showed even bigger benefits to drive on electricity in the U.S. than in Europe because gas cars in the U.S. are relatively less efficient than those in Europe.

The average mild hybrid across Europe and the U.S., with a battery pack of 400 watt-hours, saved almost 30 grams per kilometer of CO2 emissions, or about 74 g/km per kilowatt-hour of battery.

Full hybrids cut more CO2 emissions, but also had much bigger batteries averaging 1.3 kwh. Each kilowatt-hour of batteries installed accounted for a reduction of only about 51 grams per kilometer.

One of the biggest criticisms of plug-in hybrids is that they carry around a lot of extra weight (and use a lot of unnecessary materials in manufacturing) to include a gas engine and fuel tank that are seldom used.

The same argument can apply to the large batteries in long-range electric cars. The cars aren't driven any differently. On average, cars still get driven less than 30 miles a day. Allow some extra battery capacity for driving in cold weather, running the heater, and having some buffer left when a driver gets home, and they still normally use less than 30 or 40 kilowatt-hours a day. Yet many of today's electric cars have batteries twice that size or bigger to accommodate occasional trips.

The Emissions Analytics report shows that plug-in hybrids that rely mostly on batteries in their daily driving cycle—the Chevrolet Volt, for instance—saved the same amount of CO2 emissions as fully electric cars in their tests: 210 grams per kilometer. But they required much smaller batteries, just over one-sixth the size.




This is the argument Toyota is using, to excuse their inexplicable refusal to build EVs.  There is certainly an argument while battery prices remain high (they're falling fast, though) for plug-in hybrids.  You can charge your car overnight in the garage, most trips would be 100% electric because most trips are under 40K, and you have no range anxiety because there are thousands of petrol stations.   The Chevrolet Volt is a serial hybrid, i.e., it has a petrol (gasoline) engine which charges up the battery but the engine which turns the wheels directly is electric.  I talked about serial hybrids here.   

Serial hybrids and plug-in hybrids are a potentially useful bridge to fully electric cars.  But the truth is that they will be a temporary bridge.  Within a few years (5? 10?) battery supply will be unlimited, and (partly because of that) dirt cheap.  At that point, the additional cost of a second petrol engine will price hybrids out of the market, plug-in or otherwise.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

The EV bridge

EVs are still expensive to buy, though not to run.  Which is because batteries are still costly, and even though they're falling 20%  in cost per annum, they will remain expensive for another 5 or 6 years.  What's more, demand growth is so strong that batteries are in short supply.  Many legacy car manufacturers didn't believe that the EV revolution as going to happen, and so haven't contracted with battery suppliers.  The early movers have grabbed the lion's share of supply. 

So what's the work-around?

Well, it comes from somewhere unexpected: cars driven by electric motors without a plug.  In other words, a petrol (gasoline) motor drives a generator which in turn drives an electric engine which turns the wheels.

When I first heard this I thought it was insane.  Why would you choose two energy conversion losses over one?  As so often, the situation is more complex.  The internal combustion engine (ICE) has a single number of revolutions where it is at its most efficient.  But when it's the only engine, it must vary its revolutions per minute because of changing speed.  Which reduces efficiency.  Which is also why ICEs need gearboxes.  An electric engine doesn't need a gearbox, and will run efficiently at a wide range of revs.  Plus, with an electric engine you can have regenerative braking, where slowing down the car recharges the battery.  And because the petrol/electric engine combo is more efficient, it can be smaller and lighter.  As well as needing no gearbox.   


EV vs serial hybrid vs parallel hybrid
Source:CarAdvice.com



e-Power is the petrol-electric hybrid technology Nissan hopes will transition the world to EVs

Nissan Australia may be without a 'proper' passenger car in its current line-up but the Nissan Note e-POWER small car is gaining fans in Japan thanks to its flexible hybrid powertrain. Taking knowhow from the LEAF battery electric car and applying it in a series hybrid, the little Note e-POWER offers sprightly city car performance. Combining a battery, electric motor, 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine and decent-sized fuel tank, the Note has a theoretical range of around 1300km. Will this affordable transition technology be a successful bridge to the future?

While it may be Tesla that gets all the electric car plaudits, it is Japanese manufacturer Nissan that has the most runs on the board. In the past eight years, Nissan has sold over 300,000 battery-electric LEAF vehicles, with owners accumulating over 3.9 billion kilometres on pure electric power.

Building on that success, the second generation Nissan LEAF has just been confirmed for Australia and its longer range (expected to be around 240km of real world driving) is likely to extend its appeal to a broader group of buyers. Without widespread charging infrastructure and incentives, however, it may prove tough to convert mainstream buyers to a mid-$40,000 small car, regardless of its tech smarts and environmental credentials.

This is where Nissan's new e-POWER technology comes in. e-POWER is a petrol-electric hybrid system with no plug, which offers electric car performance and exceptional fuel economy with no compromise on long-range driving.

It reduces the need for a large battery, so it is more affordable too.  Unlike other car manufacturers which have gone from internal combustion engines through hybrids to battery electric vehicles, Nissan's gone the other way around -- taking what it has learned from LEAF and applying it to the e-POWER system.

Simply, e-POWER system is a series hybrid which pairs a 40kW electric motor with a small 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine which acts as a generator for the 1.5kW battery.

Whereas a conventional parallel hybrid uses the engine to drive the wheels, the purpose of the e-POWER's engine is just to charge the battery -- the wheels are always electrically driven.

On start-up, the Note is silent and initial acceleration is instant thanks to the electric propulsion system.

At moderate throttle input, e-POWER draws charge from the battery but when needed, the engine-generator kicks in to charge up the battery. The combination makes a noticeable drone once it is activated. As the engine itself is a small three-cylinder unit that runs at constant rpm, it isn't a conventional engine noise and a bit monotone in its sound.


[Read more here]



The efficiency gains are astonishing.  The Nissan Note e-Power gets 2.9 litres/100 km, or 81 MPG (in the old, and still US measurement)  This compares with Toyota's Prius, which has a combined electric/petrol engine where both engines can directly drive the wheels (i.e., a parallel hybrid) , with a MPG of 54 (4.4 l/100km), with the average US MPG at 24.7 (9.5 l/100km)  and Australia at 10.6 l/100 km (22.2 MPG).  Wow.  What's more, because it has such a small battery, it's relatively cheap.  Carsales.com (the source of the review above) lists 2017 Nissan Notes at A$28,000 including 10% sales tax (US$19,600)  The 2019 model will cost more, but the 2019 new Leaf will cost A$50,000 (including import duties and sales tax).   40% cheaper with no range anxiety.

From the consumers' POV, a serial hybrid is very like an old-fashioned ICE.  You put petrol in it, it has about the same 'sticker price' as an 'ordinary' petrol-driven car, but on the other hand it is super efficient and cheap to run, just like an EV.  You get some of the fun of driving an EV.   You don't have range anxiety.  In fact you never plug it in to an electrical socket.  Parallel hybrids like the Prius are more expensive and not as efficient.  And of course EVs are scary, and expensive to buy.   From the car-makers' POV, building a serial hybrid is the way to learn all about making real EVs, plus you don't have to source lots of batteries in a world where battery demand greatly exceeds supply.  From society's perspective, serial hybrids will reduce emissions from transport by more than 50%, without a huge up front cost.

I expect that the push to reduce emissions will lead to rapid growth in serial hybrid market share, until battery costs fall enough to make a petrol engine more expensive than larger batteries.  And it's something the legacy car makers can do to get aboard the EV bandwaggon before it's too late.  Most haven't set up substantial battery supply contracts or factories—they have little choice if they want to avoid bankruptcy/extinction.

I've been lamenting that ordinary folk won't be able to buy an EV for another 5 years.  But if legacy car manufacturers get their act together (I admit, that may not happen) we may be able to buy cheap and efficient serial hybrids before that.  And I surmise that as battery costs fall, Nissan and othe manufacturers will add a plug and a larger battery.  For example, adding just 4 kWh capacity to the Note's existing 1.5 kWh battery would give an extra 40 kms (25 miles) of petrol-free range, so that overnight charging would provide most motorists with the day's commute.

Some more articles about it:


Nissan e-POWER technology explained:



Nissan Note e-POWER 2018 Review

Nissan e-power explained

Monday, March 18, 2019

What's up with Toyota?

Toyota Prius being filled with petrol


Toyota developed the revolutionary hybrid engine with its Prius, and was the first car company to sell hybrids on a large scale.  Yet it has resisted pure EVs, instead throwing its cap into the hydrogen fuel-cell drive camp.  But fuel cell cars haven't really taken off.  They've remained pricey, while EVs just keep on getting cheaper, with longer ranges too.  One of the arguments for fuel-cell vehicles is that re-charge times are much less than with batteries, but now EV charge speeds have dramatically improved.  Tesla's new high-speed chargers can load 1000 miles of charge into the batteries in an hour, 75 miles in 5 minutes.    Meanwhile, you can charge your EV wherever you have a electric plug, which means wherever there is electricity, though that will take several hours.  For most people, though, that's not a problem, because you can charge your EV overnight in your garage, just as you would charge your mobile phone or your laptop.  Hydrogen refuelling on the other hand requires a whole new infrastructure, and where it doesn't exist, you have no way to refuel your car. 

So what has Toyota done?   DeSmogBlog comments:

There are at least 12 car companies currently selling an all-electric vehicle in the United States, and Toyota isn’t one of them. Despite admitting recently that the Tesla Model 3 alone is responsible for half of Toyota’s customer defections in North America — as Prius drivers transition to all-electric — the company has been an outspoken laggard in the race to electrification.

Now, the company is using questionable logic to attempt to justify its inaction on electrification, claiming that its limited battery capacity better serves the planet by producing gasoline-electric hybrids. 

For years, Toyota leadership has shunned investment in all-electric cars, laying out a more conservative strategy to “electrify” its fleet — essentially doubling down on hybrids and plug-in hybrids — as a bridge to a future generation of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. As Tesla, Nissan, and GM have led the technological shift to fully battery electric vehicles, Toyota has publicly bashed the prospects of all-electric fleets. (See, for instance, the swipe the company took at plug-in vehicles in this recent Toyota Corolla Hybrid commercial.)

Last week, at the Geneva Auto Show, a Toyota executive provided a curious explanation for the company’s refusal to launch a single battery electric vehicle. As Car and Driver reported, Toyota claims that it is limited by battery production capacity and that “Toyota is able to produce enough batteries for 28,000 electric vehicles each year — or for 1.5 million hybrid cars.”

In other words, because Toyota has neglected to invest in battery production, it can only produce enough batteries for a trivial number of all-electric vehicles.

Due to this self-inflicted capacity shortage, the company is forced to choose between manufacturing 1.5 million hybrids or 28,000 electric cars. Using what Car and Driver called “fuzzy math,” the company tried to justify the strategy to forgo electric vehicles (EVs) on environmental grounds.
As Toyota explained it, “selling 1.5 million hybrid cars reduces carbon emissions by a third more than selling 28,000 EVs.”

Ultimately, Toyota's strategic decision to invest in gasoline-electric hybrids and bet on fuel cells in the long term is the reason that it isn't currently producing any electric cars. The once-innovative company that mainstreamed hybrid-electric technology is now a global laggard in electrification, and is using dubious logic to justify its gas-powered fleet on environmental grounds.

By no reasonable measure is Toyota's fleet more eco-friendly without a single all-electric model. Electric cars are cleaner and greener from cradle-to-grave, including battery production, and regardless of where they charge

[Read more here]

It's sad to see Toyota, which invented and successfully sold the first hybrid, losing its way so badly.  But it is a lesson for all legacy car makers.  EVs are the future.  If you aren't making them, you are going to be superseded by manufacturers who are.  The window is very short.  By 2022, EVs will be close to ICEVs in "sticker price".  And then it's game over.