Showing posts with label grid stability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grid stability. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

Batteries mounted on electricity poles

From Ecogeneration


Batteries are an obvious, if expensive, way of storing solar energy for later use. Not every home has one, unfortunately, which is why midday exports on parts of networks with high PV penetration are becoming a problem.

In Melbourne, the United Energy distribution network moved early on this issue last year when it trialled two 85kWh batteries installed up poles in suburbs where solar exports were pushing down demand. The two Kokam batteries performed well over the summer, reducing peak demand – when the stored solar energy was discharged – between 10 and 20% and supporting between 50 and 75 homes with energy up to 2.2 hours at a time. “We were pleased with their performance,” says Greg Hannan, head of network strategy at United Energy.

With the rooftop rollout expected to see solar systems installed at a steady clip in Victoria, United Energy is launching its “Electric Avenue” project, with 30kW/66kWh community batteries to be installed up power poles at 40 sites in the network’s domain.

Most of the new batteries will be bunched within a 15km radius east and southeast of the CBD, with others around Frankston to the south and a few more deeper into the Mornington Peninsula.

The idea, Hannan explains, is to defer traditional network augmentation, an example being where pole-top transformers would be upgraded in areas where demand exceeded local capacity limits.

With batteries it’s different, he says. “We looked at the loading on the lines where there were forecast to be constraints,” he says, “and then we also take into account what is the least impactful location from a community point of view.”

The exact location of a pole-top battery takes into account loading levels, the technical characteristics of the local circuit and community issues, such as visual impact and whether anyone is close enough to be bothered when it gives off a low hum.

An optimal distribution of storage assets along suburban feeder lines becomes “the least-cost solution” for the network.

Well-placed pole-mounted storage helps manage demand constraints but also improves power quality and calms voltage issues, problems that can visit parts of a network as more homeowners install rooftop PV. “If you happen to be the unlucky last person [on a feeder line] to put in solar the voltages can be really high at certain times of the day because of exports,” Hannan says.

“It’s a trend – as you see more and more solar you’re going to get more and more of these hot spots.”

Other than seeking out points along the wires where voltages are high, the network also takes cues from solar owners’ complaints about receiving zero export limits. “Most customers have in their mind that the economics of solar are about accessing feed-in tariffs. These batteries are about trying to target that problem as well.”

The average residential solar system is getting bigger every year, growing from 4.99kW in 2015 to 8.04kW in 2020, according to the Clean Energy Council. United Energy’s low-voltage distribution network serves 660,000 customers, including 93,000 solar connections.

Hoisting batteries up poles makes sense to United because there are many more poles than suitable ground-level sites and, because of their small size (the batteries weigh just under 2,000kg), it’s simple enough to connect them to existing overhead infrastructure. The batteries used in the Electric Avenue project will be made by Melbourne company Thycon.

The 40 batteries will charge around noon and discharge into the evening peak, unless called upon as part of their other role to act as a virtual power plant directed by retailer Simply Energy. The VPP function will be activated opportunistically by Simply Energy to trade in the wholesale market for demand management and to provide frequency control ancillary services to the grid. The retailer will make regular payments to United Energy for the privilege.

“When we need them, [Simply Energy] won’t be able to trade them,” Hannan says. “Outside those times, they will make decisions based on the market conditions as to how they use them.”

The lease payments from Simply Energy, combined with deferred network augmentation costs and a $4 million grant from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency have stacked up to make a good business case, Hannan says. “It’s a good example of where one asset can provide multiple benefits.” The entire project will cost nearly $11 million.

Simply Energy will offer its solar-owning customers a product linked to the VPP.

A ring-fencing waiver from the Australian Energy Regulator has made it all possible, Hannan says. “It’s a really good example of how networks and retailers can collaborate; it’s one battery but it’s being used by the network [and] it’s able to provide benefits into the wholesale market – there is one battery servicing multiple revenue streams.”


The United Energy and Powercor networks are adding storage based on success of a trial of two pole-mounted batteries.

Saturday, April 9, 2022

How Ukraine unplugged from Russia in 24 hours

Worker repairs power lines damaged by shelling between Ukrainian forces and Russian-backed rebels near the government-held town of Avdiivka in the Donetsk region of Ukraine in March 2017. Credit: Aleksey Filippov/AFP via Getty Images


 From Scientific American


On February 24 Ukraine’s electric grid operator disconnected the country’s power system from the larger Russian-operated network to which it had always been linked. The long-planned disconnection was meant to be a 72-hour trial proving that Ukraine could operate on its own. The test was a requirement for eventually linking with the European grid, which Ukraine had been working toward since 2017. But four hours after the exercise started, Russia invaded.

Ukraine’s connection to Europe—which was not supposed to occur until 2023—became urgent, and engineers aimed to safely achieve it in just a matter of weeks. On March 16 they reached the key milestone of synchronizing the two systems. It was “a year’s work in two weeks,” according to a statement by Kadri Simson, the European Union commissioner for energy. That is unusual in this field. “For [power grid operators] to move this quickly and with such agility is unprecedented,” says Paul Deane, an energy policy researcher at the University College Cork in Ireland. “No power system has ever synchronized this quickly before.”

Ukraine initiated the process of joining Europe’s grid in 2005 and began working toward that goal in earnest in 2017, as did Moldova. It was part of an ongoing effort to align with Europe and decrease reliance on Russia, which had repeatedly threatened Ukraine’s sovereignty. “Ukraine simply wanted to decouple from Russian dominance in every sense of the word, and the grid is part of that,” says Suriya Jayanti, an Eastern European policy expert and former U.S. diplomat who served as energy chief at the U.S. embassy in Kyiv from 2018 to 2020.

After the late February trial period, Ukrenergo, the Ukrainian grid operator, had intended to temporarily rejoin the system that powers Russia and Belarus. But the Russian invasion made that untenable. “That left Ukraine in isolation mode, which would be incredibly dangerous from a power supply perspective,” Jayanti says. “It means that there’s nowhere for Ukraine to import electricity from. It’s an orphan.” That was a particularly precarious situation given Russian attacks on key energy infrastructure such as the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. (According to Jayanti, Ukraine’s grid was ultimately able to run alone for as long as it did because power demand dropped by about a third as Ukrainians fled the country.)

Three days after the invasion, Ukrenergo sent a letter to the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) requesting authorization to connect to the European grid early. Moldelectrica, the Moldovan operator, made the same request the following day. While European operators wanted to support Ukraine, they had to protect their own grids, so the emergency connection process had to be done carefully. “Utilities and system operators are notoriously risk-averse because the job is to keep the lights on, to keep everyone safe,” says Laura Mehigan, an energy researcher at University College Cork.

An electric grid is a network of power-generating sources and transmission infrastructure that produces electricity and carries it from places such as power plants, wind farms and solar arrays to houses, hospitals and public transit systems. “You can’t just experiment with a power system and hope that it works,” Deane says. Getting power where it is it needed when it is needed is an intricate process, and there is little room for error.

Crucial to this mission is grid interconnection. Linked systems can share electricity across vast areas so that a surplus of energy generated in one location can meet demand in another. “More interconnection means we can move power around more quickly, more efficiently, more cost effectively and take advantage of low-carbon or zero-carbon power sources,” says James Glynn, a senior research scholar at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University. But connecting these massive networks with many moving parts is no small order.

One of the primary challenges of interconnecting grids is synchronizing them, which is what Ukrenergo, Moldelectrica and ENTSO-E accomplished last week. Synchronization is essential for sharing electricity. The task involves aligning the frequencies of every energy-generation facility in the connecting systems. Frequency is like the heartbeat of the electric grid. Across Europe, energy-generating turbines spin 50 times per second in near-perfect unison. For Ukraine and Moldova to join in, their systems had to be adjusted to match that rhythm. “We can’t stop the power system for an hour and then try to synchronize,” Deane says. “This has to be done while the system is operating.” It is like jumping onto a moving train or a spinning ride at the playground: the train or ride is not stopping, so you had better time the jump perfectly.

Risks persist even now that Ukraine is on board. Interconnected grids do not just allow shared benefits; they also create the potential for shared problems. An issue in one part of the grid, such as a plant failure, could cause a change in frequency to ripple throughout the entire network. In a worst-case scenario, a generator with inadequate power-stabilization capabilities could amplify the change in frequency and send it back to the grid at large. “Once you interconnect two systems, you also have an issue of ensuring that the overall, bigger, interconnected system is as stable and reliable as what was there before,” says Ram Rajagopal, a senior fellow at the Precourt Institute for Energy at Stanford University. A grid that becomes unsynchronized can damage plugged-in appliances such as laptops and microwaves, and it can even damage power plants.

One safeguard against grid instability is inherent to many of Ukraine’s assets: rotational inertia. Once heavy turbines, such as those in the nuclear plants that comprise much of Ukraine’s energy supply, are spinning at a certain frequency, it takes a substantial, sustained change in power to alter their rotation. They are unaffected by minor blips in the power generated to spin them, so their frequency remains stable. This inertia helps power plants dampen slight variations in power instead of transferring them to the rest of the grid. In the case of a major failure, it buys a few precious seconds for response systems to kick in.

Still, ENTSO-E, which represents 35 countries, had numerous concerns about adding Ukraine to its grid. Those concerns related not only to grid stability but also to market, regulatory, cybersecurity and legal issues. Taken together, these factors were a major reason for the project’s original six-year timeline. Some experts thought even six years was an optimistic estimate.

Ukraine planned to address ENTSO-E's remaining concerns throughout 2022. “The only reason that that year can be chopped off is because so much has already been done to confirm all of the technical specifications,” Jayanti says. This month’s emergency authorization to synchronize enables Ukraine to purchase power, but the country cannot yet sell it. To do so, Ukraine is required to install devices called static synchronous compensators, which enhance power stability. It may be many months before Ukraine can obtain them because of supply chain issues and geopolitical obstacles, Jayanti says. In the meantime, to connect Ukraine at all, ENTSO-E adopted additional safeguards to protect the European grid.

Even with the emergency synchronization, it is important to manage expectations, experts say. “This level of interconnection is relatively small,” Deane says. “It’s helpful, but it’s not going to replace all the power in Ukraine if the power plants go down.” For now, electricity in Ukraine is still moving from power stations to the country’s broader distribution network. Should that change, Ukraine can import some electricity from ENTSO-E.

Full integration with the European grid will likely take until the war is over and Ukraine can rebuild. “This is the first step in a long journey. That journey is really about integrating Ukraine into the wider [European] system with a view to integrating more renewables and sharing resources,” Deane says. But those plans “won’t go anywhere until peace returns to the region. It’s just too risky, too dangerous.”




Monday, January 27, 2020

South Australia heads for 100% renewables by 2030

Source:  ABC


From RenewEconomy:

South Australia’s plans to reach net 100 per cent renewables within a decade, and help provide renewable power to NSW to offset the closure of its coal plants have received a major boost after the Australian Energy Regulator green-lighted the business case for a major new transmission line linking the two states.

The AER on Friday approved as “robust” the regulatory investment test for transmission (RIT-T) for the $1.5 billion, 900km Project EnergyConnect transmission line proposed between Robertstown in S.A. and Wagga Wagga in NSW, a project being led by network companies ElectraNet and TransGrid.

The approval is being celebrated as an important milestone, and not just by the project’s proponents: The South Australian government on Friday described the interconnector as “the foundation piece” of its stunning net-100% renewable plans.

The new link is critical for the development of more than 5,000MW of wind, solar and storage plants in South Australia and in south west NSW, including huge projects such as Neoen’s massive Goyder project mixing wind, solar and storage, and the Susan River solar and battery storage project, which has already signed a contract with Alinta Energy.

“This project will unlock huge new renewable energy zones in South Australia and NSW with AEMO (the Australian Energy Market Operator) reporting there are more than 5000MWs of planned renewable energy projects in close proximity to the interconnector,” South Australia energy minister Dan van Holst Pellekaan said in a statement.

“South Australia is determined to be a good global citizen, and become a net exporter of renewable energy as part of our aspiration of net-100% renewables in the 2030’s.

The link is an important part of AEMO’s Integrated System Plan, which plots a 20 year blueprint for the national grid to reach between 70 and 90 per cent renewables by 2041/42. The new line means that South Australia, already with more than 50 per cent wind and solar, will be part of a grid “loop”, rather than at the end of a skinny network.

“The SA/NSW Interconnector will also improve South Australia’s electricity systems resilience to external shocks,” van Holst Pellekaan said. “With climate change leading to increased extreme weather conditions such as storms, floods and fires, being interconnected with just Victoria leaves South Australia at real risk of becoming disconnected from the rest of the market.”


What is particularly interesting about this project is that it is supported by South Australia's Liberal government.  In Australia, the Liberal party is a right-wing party, and at the Federal level, where it is the government, it denies that global heating is man-made and is resolutely opposed to renewables and electric vehicles.   "SA is determined to be a good global citizen"!  From the Liberal Party!  It makes one hope that when renewables reach 50% nationally (SA is now at 52%), the national right-wing parties might also become "environmentalists" as they see not just the economic but also the environmental benefits of renewables.

Friday, May 13, 2016

Baseload solar at 6c per kWh



The company behind the Crescent Dunes concentrated solar power plant (which I talked about here) has put out a paper which claims that its technology can produce dispatchable electricity at  US 6 cents per kWh.  This is lower than coal and peaking gas power plants.

 A German – and formerly majority Australian owned – developer of concentrated solar power plants with molten salt storage says it can get the cost of electricity from a utility-scale version of its technology, with 15 hours of thermal energy storage, down to between 5 and 7 cents (US) per kilowatt-hour.

Its Direct Molten Salt (DMS) technology has been used at the 110MW Crescent Dunes power tower in Nevada US.

According to the paper, the DMS CSP technology can, at a scale of 50MW with 14-hour energy storage, deliver electricity prices of 9.3-12.2 US¢/kWh – a cost “already below today ́s average cost of fossil power generation.”

The larger the plant’s capacity, the lower the cost of electricity falls. So a 100MW DMS plant with around 15 hours storage could deliver electricity price levels of 6.4-8.5 US¢/kWh – “lower even than (new) coal,” the paper says. And with its large and scalable molten salt energy storage systems, the use of expensive diesel generators to cover late-night demand peaks would also be mitigated.

Read more here.

In fact dispatchable power is more useful than baseload, because it can be released when it is needed.  Plants producing baseload power can't easily dial up or down output in response to demand.  This often leads to electricity being "shed" which is wasteful and expensive.

The shape of the future generation grid is becoming clearer:


  • solar, via panels on rooftops as well as utility scale solar farms
  • wind
  • CSP
  • high-voltage DC lines to connect windy and sunny places to centres of demand.
  • some battery storage to stabilise the grid (its response time is much quicker than peaking power plants)


Sunday, August 9, 2015

Tesla's Q2 shareholder statement

We still keep on getting comments that renewables won't work, because grid stability/renewables variability.   But that ignores the advent of cheap storage.  Tesla's introduction of the PowerWall (for households) and the PowerPack (for businesses and utilities) will revolution electricity storage and the functioning of the grid.

This article about Tesla's second quarter note to shareholders is most interesting.

Musk makes the point that storage will halve the need for power plants EVEN WITHOUT RENEWABLES, because we have had to build extra power plants to cope with high demand at peak periods.  Batteries can do this better, and cheaper.  Add renewables to the mix and most power plants will be redundant.  And before you mock the man as too optimistic, recall that 5 years ago Tesla sold as many cars a year (800) as it sells in a week now.

But that doesn’t mean Tesla needs renewables to sell batteries, founder and CEO Elon Musk said Wednesday.
“It seems like people link this too much to renewable energy,” Musk said during Tesla’s Second Quarter earnings call. “Of course we are great believers in renewable energy, but that is not the gating function for stationary storage.”
Ultimately, said Musk, storage allows utilities to turn off power plants or defer new ones.
“You can basically, in principle, shut down half of the world’s power plants if you had stationary storage" he said.
Utilities currently have to build power plants to meet peak demand, and then some. Batteries allow utilities to store energy when demand is low and use it when demand is high, without turning on more power plants. [read the full article here]


There is a limitation, though:  how rapidly we can deploy storage?  The output of Tesla's giga-factory is now already committed for the first year of its life, so that is the true  constraint on switching to a coal-free future.  It's not the cost of renewables, which are now cheaper than new coal plants.  It's not the cost of storage.  Tesla has solved that.  It's the supply of batteries.

It matters, because the world continues to warm.  Once again, the latest month's data (for June) were the hottest ever.  The 12 months moving average shown in the chart below shows a sharp spike to new highs.

Source