Showing posts with label electro-diesel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label electro-diesel. Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2024

NSW's bi-mode diesel/electric trains

 I've talked before about bi-mode trains.  Most 'diesel' trains are actually diesel-electric.  A diesel generator charges batteries (in the old days, lead-acid batteries, and for all I know, that may still be the case) which then drive the electric motors which turn the wheels.  Why such an apparently complicated arrangement?  It's because electric motors have a higher torque than diesel motors, and can therefore accelerate away from stations more quickly.  A bi-mode train is one that can, when it's possible, directly use electricity from an overhead wire or third rail to drive the engines, obviating the need for diesel; or can use the diesel engine when there is no electricity source.

There is also a battery-electric train, which is not quite the same thing.  This charges up its batteries whenever there is external electricity, then uses the stored power in its batteries when the wire ends.  This option, won't work, however, in places where the distance between population centres is large, such as Australia, because batteries are not yet energy-dense enough to cover long distances.  

Electric traction is the "best" for trains in terms of operating cost.  But the capital and maintenance costs are high, and so expanding electrification to the routes where there are only a few trains a day is not cost-effective.

In NSW, which is between California and Texas is size, the rail network within a couple of hundred kilometres around Sydney is electrified, but the majority (in terms of track, not population) of the state is served by diesel.  The NSW State government has started replacing aging diesel trains with bi-mode trains, which can switch between diesel(-electric) in the countryside to electric in the city.  Despite a minority of the network being electrified, the reduction in emissions is still significant. 





In the UK, Hitachi isn't just building battery-electric trains, it's also developed bi-mode trains, as this video below shows.




For long routes, bi-mode traction makes sense.  For shorter non-electrified routes, battery-electric makes sense.  It shows you that we can cut rail emissions, if only we put our minds to it.

Monday, March 25, 2024

Locos which keep going when the wire ends

I was doing some research on "bi-mode" or "dual-mode" locomotives, which can use both electric power from an overhead catenary, as well as diesel power.   Diesel-electric locos already use electric engines to turn the wheels: the diesel engine drives an electric generator which in turn drives the wheels.  Why this apparently inefficient arrangement?  Because an electric engine can provide full torque at zero RPM, unlike plain diesel engines, allowing for faster acceleration from stops.  

Locos which can use both diesel and electricity as energy sources are called electro-diesel locos, whereas, locos using a diesel motor to drive an electric generator are called diesel-electric.  Some diesel-electric locos also have a battery to allow for a larger power draw during acceleration.  

Obviously, if the loco is on a stretch of track where there is electric power, then it would make sense to use the electricity available to run the loco's electric engine.  That is exactly what Siemens Vectron Dual-Mode locomotives does.




From Siemens website:

 

Vectron Dual Mode – keeps going where the wire ends

The Vectron Dual Mode is the up-to-date answer to changing route requirements. The dual power locomotives unite the advantages of full-featured diesel locomotives with those of electric locomotives. This combination empowers you to respond flexibly at all times to your traction requirements – so you'll always keep moving, with or without an overhead wire.

Whenever an overhead wire is available, it should be used. Electrical operation is much more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than diesel operation. But because Germany [and the UK, Australia, the USA .....] will continue to have many non-electrified sections of track for a long time to come, many diesel locomotives still run under an overhead wire – without actually using it. This makes very little economic or ecological sense. The Vectron Dual Mode excels in both operating modes, offering a real alternative to diesel-only operation.

Whether you want to react flexibly to unplanned diversions or boost environmental performance in conurbations: the Vectron Dual Mode offers you a wealth of advantages in your day-to-day operations.

With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll handle a wide range of traction tasks much more economically than with a standard diesel locomotive. Every kilometre saves fuel, and thereby reduces energy costs. You'll also reduce the number of hours your diesel alternator set is operating. Altogether, you'll benefit from a reduction in energy and maintenance costs of up to 53%.  [The savings obviously depend on what percentage of the total network is electrified.  On the other hand, diesel locos have to keep running even when they are stationary.  Given that hybrid cars use up to 40% less fuel than petrol cars because the engines don't run when the car is stationary, and also because they recharge their battery as they slow down or go down a hill, significant energy savings appear quite possible, provided the loco also has a battery.]

The issue of environmental pollution is becoming increasingly important in cities and metropolitan areas. With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll make an important contribution to sustainable freight transport. By taking advantage of electricity wherever possible, you reduce carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions. This lets you reduce your annual local emissions by 950t of CO2, 6t of nitrogen oxides and 37kg of particulate matter compared with a standard diesel locomotive – and significantly improve your fleet's environmental performance.  [Again, the percentage of electrified track will alter these numbers.  For example, only 10% of Australia's railway track is electrified.  However, a much larger percentage of track in urban areas and conurbations is electrified, and a larger percentage of total traffic takes place on these networks.  For example, in Victoria, V-Line trains which serve regional and country destinations travel for part of their journey on electrified tracks.  On my journeys from a provincial town 200 kms from the city into the big smoke, half the distance is electrified.]


There is another advantage.  To extend existing electrified sections, installing overhead electric wires has to be done from the edge of the existing electrification to the next station or to a depot, which makes for substantial lump-sum outlays.  In other words, it has to be done in expensive chunks.  With a bi-mode loco, electrification can proceed at, say, 5 kilometres at a time, so that the electrified network can be gradually extended over time.  The loco just keeps going under diesel power when it reaches the end of the wire.  Also, the electrified sectors don't need to be contiguous, as the diesel engine could be used across the gaps.  

A good idea.


See also:

Saturday, March 23, 2024

GWR's New Battery Powered Train

Step by step we move away from fossil fuels in railways. 

 Electrification is overall cheaper on busy lines. To date, diesel has been cheaper on less-used lines, because the higher capital cost of installing third-rail/overhead-wire technology isn't offset by the cheaper running coats of electricity.    

I've talked before about battery-powered electric trains which charge from the overhead catenary when they travel on track with electrification, allowing them to travel some way on un-electrified track. 

 Which of these alternative approaches would be better would depend on distances travelled and how fast overhead catenary-charged batteries can charge.  In Australia, for example, rural towns are much further apart than the towns served by this line in England, which are roughly 5 miles apart.   This would require more batteries, on the train and next to the track, and more charging time.  

An alternative is a locomotive which can run on either diesel or electric power, called "electro-diesel" or "bi-mode"  locos (not to be confused with diesel-electric motors), such as the new trains in NSW (which I know I wrote about here on Volewica, but have been unable to find the article)