Showing posts with label Starlink. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Starlink. Show all posts

Sunday, September 18, 2022

Starlink now available in Antarctica

McMurdo Station, Antarctica




From Teslarati

Elon Musk was not kidding when he stated that Starlink is designed to provide high-speed internet access to everywhere in the globe. Starlink recently had a milestone in this regard, with SpaceX confirming that the satellite internet system is now on all seven continents, including Antarctica.

The idea of Starlink providing high-speed internet access to Antarctica seemed farfetched just a few years ago. But as per SpaceX’s post on Twitter, it is now possible to provide internet access to extremely remote locations like Antarctica thanks to Starlink’s space laser network, which reduces the need for ground stations.

The National Science Foundation praised Starlink, noting that scientists in Antarctica are “over the moon” due to the satellite internet service. The NSF also noted that the Starlink terminal had been installed at the McMurdo Station, a US Antarctic research station on the south tip of Ross Island.

“NSF-supported USAP scientists in #Antarctica are over the moon! Starlink is testing polar service with a newly deployed user terminal at McMurdo Station, increasing bandwidth and connectivity for science support,” the NSF wrote on Twitter.

McMurdo Station is the largest community in Antarctica, capable of supporting up to 1,258 residents. It also serves as one of three US-based Antarctic science facilities that operate year-round. With all months of the year having an average temperature below freezing, Starlink’s capability to provide internet access to such a location is indeed very impressive.

Starlink is quickly growing into Elon Musk’s latest disruptor, and with its coverage of Antarctica, the satellite internet system is proving that it does have what it takes to provide its services across the globe. SpaceX definitely seems to be ramping its mainstream efforts for the internet service, with Elon Musk noting recently that the private space company has had conversations with Apple for possible Starlink connectivity for iPhones.

Monday, July 11, 2022

Starlink Maritime is available

 From Teslarati


SpaceX announced a new Starlink product. Starlink Maritime will provide oceangoing vessels with up to 350 Mbps download while at sea. And it’s not just ships and boats that would benefit. Starlink Maritime is primarily for all types of sea-going vessels including merchant vessels, oil rigs, and even premium yachts.

According to the website, “Starlink Maritime allows you to connect from the most remote waters across the world, just like you would in the office or at home.”

“In addition to withstanding extreme cold, heat, hail, sleet, heavy rain, and gale-force winds, Starlink also holds up against rocket engines.”

“Starlink is currently being used to get high-quality video of SpaceX rocket landings at sea, providing continuous coverage in the face of engines capable of generating up to 190,000 lbs of force.”

Users will be able to monitor and manage their Starlink fleet from a single portal and installation is designed with minimal above-deck space in mind.

The cost of Starlink Maritime includes a monthly payment of $5,000 and a one-time hardware cost of $10,000. The latter also includes two high-performance terminals. That may sound expensive but Elon Musk pointed out that SpaceX was paying $150,000 per month for a worse connection for its ships.

He added it wasn’t easy to ruggedize Starlink for relentless salt spray and extreme winds and storms in the deep ocean. As someone who lives in a state that has hurricane season, I’m sure these ocean storms will definitely put Starlink to the ultimate test.

Starlink has proven to save lives already. Elon Musk provided Ukraine with thousands of Starlink terminals which has helped the nation stay online despite the continuous attacks from Russia. SpaceX also provided Starlink terminals to St. Charles Parish after hurricane Ida left most of the southern portion of Louisiana without power and communications.




In the comments below the article, it was pointed out just how lucrative this would prove to Starlink/SpaceX.

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Starlink has destroyed Putin's disinformation campaign

 From Tesmanian




SpaceX partnered with the U.S. Agency for International Development to send 15,000 Starlink user terminals to Ukraine amid the Russia invasion earlier this year. Today, June 11, marks 3 months and 2 weeks since Russia started a full-scale war against Ukraine. The Starlink satellite broadband constellation has proven to be a reliable source of communication in the country, especially for government authorities and emergency response teams who are working around-the-clock to keep civilians safe from Russian soldiers’ aggression.

U.S. Brigadier General Steven Butow says SpaceX's Starlink services have been vital for Ukrainian military operations, he has worked with SpaceX Starlink representatives as the director of the space portfolio at the defense innovation unit. "The strategic impact is, it totally destroyed [Vladimir] Putin's information campaign," Butow told Politico reporters. Russia is known to run misinformation campaigns to control its population; that tactic has not worked with Ukrainian civilians thanks to SpaceX's Starlink. "He never, to this day, has been able to silence Zelenskyy," said Butow about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

"It helped us a lot, in many moments related to the blockade of our cities, towns, and related to the occupied territories," Zelenskyy told Wired reporters in an exclusive interview. "Sometimes we completely lost communication with those places. To lose contact with those people is to lose control completely, to lose reality. [...] Believe me: people who got out of the occupied cities, where there was no such assistance as Starlink, said that the Russians told them that Ukraine doesn't exist anymore, and some people even began to believe it. I am really grateful for the support of Starlink," said Zelenskyy.

SpaceX operates approximately 2,600 Starlink satellites in Low Earth Orbit. The network has allowed soldiers to maintain contact with family members and coordinate fighting tactics. Starkink is very easy to access by simply connecting the user antenna to a power source and pointing it at the sky with easy instructions that allow anyone to access from anywhere in just a few minutes. Politico wrote a great story about how a Ukrainian soldier is using Starlink during combat - Read it here: UkraineX: How Elon Musk’s space satellites changed the war on the ground.

"We’ve got more than 11,000 Starlink stations and they help us in our everyday fight on all the fronts," says Ukraine’s Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, "We’re ready, even if there is no light, no fixed internet, through generators using Starlink, to renew any connection in Ukraine." Alongside the Starlink user terminals, SpaceX founder Elon Musk also delivered Tesla electricity generators and car cigarette lighter power adapters to use Starlink aboard vehicles.


Source: Bloomberg


Friday, April 29, 2022

Hawaiian Airlines first big airline to get Starlink

 From Tesmanian


SpaceX launches Starlink satellites to Low Earth Orbit on a weekly basis to expand broadband coverage globally. To date, the company operates around 2,200 satellites and it already beams internet service to over 250,000 customers living across 29 countries and has over half-a-million service pre-orders it is in the process fulfilling. SpaceX’s goal is to provide high-speed internet with low-latency anywhere on the planet.

On Monday, April 25, Hawaiian Airlines announced it will become the first major airline to provide free SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi for passengers. The airline will equip its Airbus A330 and A321neo aircraft, as well as an incoming fleet of Boeing 787-9s, with Starlink terminals to access the satellite constellation during transpacific flights next year. Hawaiian Airlines currently does not provide any Wi-Fi service during flights because they have not found a reliable network that serves flights over the Pacific Ocean. 

“When we launch with Starlink we will have the best connectivity experience available in the air,” said Hawaiian Airlines President and CEO Peter Ingram. “We waited until technology caught up with our high standards for guest experience, but it will be worth the wait. Our guests can look forward to fast, seamless and free Wi-Fi to complement our award-winning onboard Hawaiian hospitality.”

“Hawaiian Airlines is ensuring its passengers will experience high-speed internet the way we expect it in the 21st century, making hassles like downloading movies before takeoff a relic of the past,” said SpaceX Vice President of Starlink Commercial Sales Jonathan Hofeller. “With Starlink, the inflight experience is greatly simplified so that once passengers step onboard the plane the internet works seamlessly throughout their flight. Soon, passengers will enjoy all the benefits of having the world’s best inflight internet connectivity from the comfort of their seats.”

In November 2021, Hofeller participated in a panel discussion at the Airline Passenger Experience Association where he shared that the company was already testing it with several aircraft. “We have our own aviation product in development […] we’ve already done some demonstrations to date, and looking to get that product finalized to be put on aircraft in the very near future,” he said. The Starlink antenna used aboard airplanes will feature technology similar to its consumer terminals “with obvious enhancements for aviation connectivity,” according to Hofeller.

The Hawaiian Airlines announcement comes after Delta Airlines told reporters it is performing “exploratory testing” of the Starlink internet technology and JSX charter airline announced it will equip 100 airplanes with SpaceX Starlink terminals.  



Sunday, April 24, 2022

In-flight internet via Starlink

 From Tesmanian

JSX, a charter airline that offers private point-to-point flights, will be the first to use SpaceX Starlink Internet during flights. “JSX is proud to be the first air carrier to adopt SpaceX Starlink internet inflight, free for every Customer onboard. We’d call it the best Wi-Fi in the sky, but it’s actually the greatest Wi-Fi in the galaxy - coming later this year,” announced JSX representatives on April 21st. The airline also released a video clip that says - “The best Wi-Fi in the galaxy is coming to the world’s most joyful air carrier, announcing Starlink Wi-Fi on JSX complimentary for every customer. Launching this year.” The video is linked in the Tweet below. JSX currently provides non-stop flights between airports located in Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and New York. The private airline operates Embraer ERJ-135 and ERJ-145 aircraft, capable of transporting 30 to 50 passengers.

SX CEO Alex Wilcox told CNBC reporters that they plan to equip 100 airplanes with SpaceX Starlink terminals to receive internet from the satellites in Low Earth Orbit. The announcement comes after Delta Airlines CEO Ed Bastian told The Wall Street Journal reporters the commercial airline company is performing “exploratory testing” of the Starlink internet technology and in ongoing discussions with SpaceX representatives.

SpaceX Vice President of Commercial Sales Jonathan Hofeller participated in a panel discussion at the Airline Passenger Experience Association in November last year, where he said that SpaceX aims to offer Starlink internet service to airlines “as soon as possible” and mentioned the company was already testing it with several aircraft. “We have our own aviation product in development […] we’ve already done some demonstrations to date, and looking to get that product finalized to be put on aircraft in the very near future,” he said. Hofeller also shared with the panel that the Starlink antenna used aboard airplanes will feature technology similar to its consumer terminals “with obvious enhancements for aviation connectivity.”




Monday, March 21, 2022

Starlink most downloaded app in Ukraine

 From Tesmanian


Russia's invasion of Ukraine has entered its fourth week. The war has caused the destruction of important infrastructures, including telecommunications towers. Last month, the Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Transformation of Ukraine Mykhailo Fedorov asked SpaceX founder Elon Musk for help with connecting communities to the Starlink broadband constellation soon after Russian soldiers attacked the country. SpaceX rapidly delivered the user terminals that actively provide internet service to the war-torn country. 

The company has delivered multiple trucks loaded with Starlink Kits that include all the necessary equipment to access the Internet network. SpaceX delivered another truck loaded with more equipment to support Ukraine on Friday, March 18. Reliable internet service enables emergency response teams to assist with keeping civilians safe from Russian attacks. "A new batch of Starlink stations! While Russia is blocking access to the Internet, Ukraine is becoming more open to the entire world. Ukraine is the truth. The truth always wins. Thank you, Elon Musk, the Government of Poland, and Orlen," said Fedorov. Russia is known for the severe censorship it imposes upon its citizens, having Starlink user antennas in Ukraine is crucial for freedom of speech. Starlink is already in use at multiple humanitarian assistance shelters in Ukraine to enable people to share their story with the world and maintain communication with loved ones. 

The Starlink user terminal is very easy to install with an App that provides instructions for setting up the network. Starlink became the most downloaded App in Ukraine, according to data by Sensor Tower. Ever since the company delivered Starlink user terminals to Ukraine, global downloads of the Starlink App via Google Play and the Apple App Store have more than tripled during the past 2 weeks. The Starlink App has been downloaded a total of 98,000 times across Ukraine as of March 14th. 

SpaceX Starlink engineers released a software update that will allow the Starlink user terminals (dish antennas) to reduce power consumption to work on low-energy even when Ukrainian users experience power outages in the midst of the war. “Updating software to reduce peak power consumption, so Starlink can be powered from car cigarette lighter,” Musk said on March 3rd, “Mobile roaming enabled, so phased array antenna can maintain signal while on moving vehicle.” If Starlink users experience a power outage they will be able to connect the dish to a car’s cigarette lighter to communicate via the Starlink satellite network. This feature is useful for rescue teams that are protecting civilians on the go. For more information about the service visit SpaceX’s official website Starlink.com. 





Friday, March 4, 2022

20 Things which will change the world by 2040

Here are 20 things in no particular order which I think will totally change the world over the next 20 years.

1.  CHEAP ELECTRICITY

 Wind costs are falling by 5-10% per annum, solar by 10% to 20% and batteries by 15% plus.  Wind's cost declines will prolly slow over the next 10 years—it's a mature technology.  But the cost declines in solar are likely to continue, and in batteries, there's a real chance they'll accelerate.  If these trends continue (and why won't they?), in 10 years electricity will cost 25% of what it does now.  If the trend decline then halves to, say 7% a year, then in 20 years, electricity will cost just 10% of what it does now.  Cheap energy supercharges economic growth.  The low oil price from 1945 to 1973 helped drive rapid and sustained growth in the world economy.  Cheap renewables will do the same over the next 20 years and beyond.

2.  EVS

They're going to be cheaper than ICEVs (internal combustion vehicles) to buy, and much cheaper to run.  They'll be replacing ICEVs  so the shifts in society might not seem dramatic.  But with AIs running them, transport as a service will become common.  You'll summon a car using your phone, and it will drive itself to where you are and then to where you want to go.  Because EVs will last much longer than ICEVs and will be significantly cheaper to run, "transport as a service" will be a popular way for people to get around.  Car sales are likely to decline by 50% plus, as TAAS takes off.  Air pollution in cities will end.  By 2040, most of the world's vehicle fleet will be electric.  Maybe hydrogen fuel-cell, but I doubt it.  The cost of building a hydrogen refuelling network will be much more costly than just attaching your car to an already existing network, the electric grid.  And the energy efficiency of the hydrogen cycle is much lower than batteries.

3.  AI

I don't think we'll have true AI, as in sentient robots.  But we will have very sophisticated computerised control systems, such as those which will allow for self-driving cars and self-landing rockets.  This has been made possible by the 5 or 6 orders of magnitude decline in the costs of and size of super computers, as Tony Seba points out.  SpaceX's ability to land and re-use its rockets would not have been possible without the advances in computing power.  These advances and changes all interact.

4.  3-D PRINTING

This cuts the cost of manufacturing metal things by at least half, because there's much less scrap.  It also reduces the stock of parts you have to keep on hand.  And allows you to make more complicated things, like SpaceX's extraordinary new Raptor rocket engines.  On the ISS, there is a 3-D printer to make spare parts.  On Mars, and the Moon, 3-D printers will be used to build habitats; to make things which would take too long or are too expensive to get from Earth; and to make things which have short production runs or are experimental.

5.  VAT MEAT, MILK AND FISH

Cheap energy will change agriculture.  Right now, 20% of Australia's tomatoes come from a factory in the semi-desert in the north of the State of South Australia, using desalinated sea water and growing the tomatoes in greenhouses.  This undertaking uses no fossil fuel at all.  Animal rearing  uses vast areas of land, is highly polluting, and contributes 20% to global CO₂ emissions.  Vat meats and fish are already starting to take off.  Their costs are declining year by year.  By 2040, they will become the norm.  

There won't be "real" meat on Mars or on the Moon or in Space Stations .  There just aren't the resources to grow it.  If vat meat, fish and milk taste like the real thing, cost about the same or less, are environmentally kinder, and involve no animal suffering, why wouldn't you switch?  This will reduce emissions by 20% while allowing the rewilding of unused fields and grasslands.

6.  CHEAP ACCESS TO SPACE

Cheap access to space will change everything.  To settle Mars, we'll need to rapidly improve a whole range of technologies, like vat meat production, genuine air conditioning (meaning far more than just heating and cooling), hydroponics, water purification, extracting CO₂ from the atmosphere, genetic modification, medicine, and so on.

By the time SpaceX's Starship is running, SpaceX will have cut the cost of launching a kilogram to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) from $22,000 to ~$20.  Whenever you have a 10-fold decrease in costs you get disruption, as new technolgies take off.   This will be a 1000-fold decrease in cost.  We're already seeing the consequences of cheaper launches in the roll-out of SpaceX's Starlink super fast internet.  The development of a space-faring civilisation will spawn new technologies we haven't even thought of.  Who would have thought 20 years ago that we would carry computers in our pockets millions of times more powerful than the first IBM computer, computers which connect us to a massive knowledge network as well as news, videos, maps, Wikipedia?   None of that was predicted.  Yet think of the businesses which have developed because of those twin inventions, the smart phone and the internet (Apple, Google, Uber, Air BnB ....).  And think also how the explosive growth of smart phone sales also drove down li-ion battery prices,  allowing EVs and grid energy storage to happen.

7.  ASTEROID MINING

With cheap access to space also comes asteroid mining.  Because the asteroids aren't in deep gravity wells like the Earth or Mars, nudging them into orbits which intersect Earth's or Mars's will be cheap.  The resources of a single medium-sized  asteroid, for example for rare earth metals, will more than equal all the rare earth metals that have ever been mined on Earth.   We will prolly stop stripping the Earth to produce metals and minerals and instead start disassembling asteroids to do that.  The world's major resource companies will be asteroid miners.

But some of these will be used in space manufacturing.  Why take stuff into the gravity well when you can build it in LEO?  Asteroid mining will be even more important on Mars, as asteroids will likely provide the volatiles needed to give Mars an atmosphere dense enough for humans to work in without needing to wear pressurised space suits. 

8. BECOME A MULTI-PLANETARY SPECIES

Our first colony will be Mars.  Read  the Red Mars trilogy to see how colonising Mars will change Earth too.  Not just in technological advances but also in social advances.  Looking down on Mars and Earth from space will change mankind's perception of itself.  As Robert Zubrin says, knowing that there is no shortage of resources because we have unlimited resources in space means that most of the causes of war on Earth will disappear.  Of course, no matter how technologically advanced and prosperous humans become, there is no reason to suppose we will ever be more intelligent, less venal, less greedy, and less petty. 

After we colonise Mars, we'll start on Venus.  That'll be much harder.  But by then we will also have colonies in the asteroid belt and large inhabited space stations in orbit round the Earth and Mars.  We will truly be a multi-planetary species.  And that will change everything.

9. TRULY GLOBAL HIGH-SPEED INTERNET

SpaceX's Starlink has kicked off a revolution in high-speed internet.  Starlink's network will be truly global, available in the Arctic and Antarctic,  the Sahara and across the world's oceans.  In countries where wired internet is only available in cities, such as most of Africa, Starlink will provide links to remote villages and towns.  It'll be expensive ($100 per month), but villages could club together to pay for it.  Those same villages are off the electric grid, too, and small solar panels and batteries will change that.  Children who do their homework by candlelight will now be able to do it by LED light, and access the internet, connecting to the ginormous encyclopedia which is the interweb.  20 years ago we didn't have Wikipedia.  Today, even if your village doesn't have a library, even if you  can't afford to buy a book, you'll still be able to study science, maths, languages, technologies.    


10.  TERRAFORMING THE EARTH

The current fall in emissions isn't rapid enough to prevent a rise of more than 1.5 degrees C, maybe even 2 degrees C,  in global temperatures.   We will need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere.  One way would be to cover desert and semi-desert areas with forests.  To do this would require desalination plants, powered by solar, which will get cheaper and cheaper over the next 2 decades.  It would be a mammoth undertaking, almost beyond our imagination.  But it will prolly be necessary.  Given the scale of the problem, any de-carbonisation method will have to be massive.  But something will have to be done to remove CO2 from our atmosphere.  Changing a planet's climate to make it more livable is called terraforming.  You might also call it geo-engineering.  Whatever; we will prolly have started to do it by 2040.  We will have no choice.


11.  GENE THERAPY & GENETIC MODIFICATION

The colonisation of Mars and the growth of space travel will accelerate the development of gene therapy, because radiation on Mars and in space will cause genetic damage.   Treating that will become imperative, and as technology often responds to extreme need, it will likely be developed, because it has to be.  Gene therapy will provides cures for cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and inherited genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis. 

Creating plants which will grow in our domes on Mars and on space stations to provide us with food will be important to the pioneers.   Dwarf wheat, larger tomatoes, low-rise almond/fruit trees, and so on and so on.  The need for these advances will drive rapid change.  But the advances themselves will drive down the cost of food back here on Earth.  


12.  THE RISE OF AFRICA

Africa is the second-largest continent, in population and size, compared to Asia.  For decades, Africa has been an economic laggard.  But solar favours countries near the equator.   Seasonal storage needs are much less than in high latitudes further from the equator.  8 hours of storage will be enough for most places within 30 degrees north and south of the equator.  Cheap electricity will be even cheaper in Africa.  In addition, Africa's population is young, it speaks English as a first or second language, and it's so far behind the production possibility frontier that high speed internet and distributed solar power will be transforming.    

Until recently, Africa has lagged the world economy, but access to electricity and information will change everything.  Africa will be the new China, with high growth rates, falling poverty and  rapid development, and with that will come greater political power.  China has recognised this reality; the rest of the world has not.  That needs to change.


13.  THE END OF NEO-LIBERALISM

Neo-liberalism has been tried for 40 years.  It has resulted in greater economic and financial instability, and vastly increased inequality of income and wealth (especially in those mostly Anglophone countries which have most enthusiastically embraced it), as well as a lower growth rate.   The rising inequality has also led to increased political extremism.  Economists like to pretend that economics is separate from politics.  But the consequences of increased inequality and greater uncertainty have shown that there is a non-economic price for neo-liberalism: the rise of far right parties and policies. The dogma of small government, low taxes, and deregulation is becoming tarnished.  The Covid crisis has conclusively shown that there are some things government does better than the private sector.  Unlike the neo-liberal dogma, the private sector doesn't inevitably do things better and more cheaply than the public sector, especially when second order effects are considered.  Privatisations of state-owned enterprises have mostly failed: costs are higher, services no better, corruption worse.

Expect a gradual retreat from the extreme tenets of neo-liberalism towards a more measured and pragmatic process.  Big(ger) government is back.  The big borrowings government took up under Covid are not going to be repaid.  Instead, governments will start running deficits again.  The post WW2 pragmatic neo-Keynesian synthesis will once again modify red-in-tooth-and-claw capitalism.  


14.  A UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME

Technological advances will cause major disruptions to job markets.  So will shifts in economic growth and development.  In the past, dire poverty among the old was reduced by the introduction of a universal basic income or social wage for old people, otherwise known as the old age pension.  A UBI in developed countries, for everyone, has so far been seen as a step too far.  But opinion is changing.  If we are truly to drain the poison of the extreme right, we will need to address the insecurity and poverty of the precariat, which will likely be worsened by the technological and economic changes I think will happen.   A UBI would do that.


15.  HYPERSONIC INTERCONTINENTAL FLIGHTS

SpaceX would like to use Starship to run suborbital long-distance flights.  Musk has said that over long distances, suborbital flights will have a lower cost than conventional jet travel.  At 20 times the speed.  Anybody want to bet it won't happen?


16.  NEURALINK

Musk is afraid that a real AI (as opposed to very clever software) would end up ruling the world and humanity would end up being no more than pets of the machines.  If we even survive.  His response to that is to develop brain-machine interfaces.  This would make us as clever as our AI overlords.  We would have chips in our brain, like a permanently embedded smartphone.  It might never get to that, but if an interface can enable a blind person to see again, or a disabled person to walk, then that would be huge.  And having a small device in your head which allows one to communicate directly with the interweb would be revolutionary.  Not sure I like the security implications of that, though.


17.   ELECTRIC PLANES

We will soon see the introduction of electric planes which will allow short flights (up to 400 km) at 1/20th the cost of jet or jet-prop aircraft of today.  They will be used to connect outlying regions to the spaceports where suborbital ultrasonic flights will depart from and arrive at.  The long-term outlook for conventional airliners isn't good at all.  What these two developments mean together is that one will be able to fly from a small town in the bush to another small town on the other side of the world in a few hours.  A hundred years ago, it took 3 weeks for a ship to sail from Australia to Europe.  Currently, it takes 24 hours to fly that distance.  With suborbital hypersonic rockets, the journey time will be down to just an hour.


18.   NUCLEAR FUSION

Nuclear fusion is the opposite of nuclear fission, where large atoms, e.g., uranium, are split into smaller atoms, releasing massive amount of energy.  Fusion is what happens inside stars like our sun, where the lightest atoms, hydrogen, are blasted together under intense heat and presure to produce heavier atoms.  And therein lies the difficulty--it's very hard to create those conditions outside the fiery heart of a star.   For 70 years, the joke goes, nuclear fusion has always been 30 years away. But maybe that's changed.  Fusion is likely to make much faster progress now that private firms and individuals are bankrolling research than it has under the aegis of giant bureaucracies, so I think we'll prolly have fusion by 2040.  We will need nuclear fusion on Mars, and to mine the asteroids.  And it will be enormously useful on Erarth, too.

19.  A RETURN TO DEMOCRACY

Winston Churchill said that democracy was the worst system, apart from all the others.  People have pointed to the Chinese and Russian dictatorships as exemplars of how to run politico-economic systems.   Yet both countries have declining growth rates.  This is particularly interesting in the case of China, which is far from being a wealthy country, and where you would expect growth to remain higher than it is, given where it is in the typical development pathway.  For all America's faults, and despite the out-and out dementia of the Right and the Republican Party, the technological developments there are breathtaking.  Perhaps people need freedom if they are to innovate.  Just a thought.  

If we drain the pus of divisiveness and far-right toxins from our democracies by reducing inequality, and again giving ordinary people hope that their lives and the lives of their children will be better, I believe that the autocratic political/social/ economic alternatives of China and Russia will be seen as what they are: relative failures.

20.  SYNERGY

All these changes will interact, just as smartphones and internet did, the one driving the development of the other.  And the interactions will spiral out of control unforecastably. changing the world in ways which will surprise and shock us.  And some of the consequences will be adverse.  But it's going to be a most interesting ride.





Friday, February 18, 2022

SpaceX safely de-orbits Starlink satellites

 From Tesmanian


SpaceX demonstrated on-orbit debris mitigation after a geomagnetic storm destroyed 40 Starlink satellites on February 4th. The satellites were launched to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) by a Falcon 9 rocket on February 3rd. Geomagnetic storms are a major disturbance of Earth’s magnetosphere that is caused when there is an exchange of high energy that comes from Solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth. The geomagnetic disturbance caused the density of Earth's atmosphere to increase. The higher atmospheric drag in LEO caused 40 out of the 49 newly launched Starlink satellites to fall back to Earth. The satellites are designed to completely burn up in the atmosphere when they’re no longer operational to avoid creating space junk in orbit. Some of the satellites affected by the magnetic storm already burned up.

Sociedad de Astronomia del Caribe, a Puerto Rico astronomy non-profit organization, shared on February 7 that it captured a video of some of the brand new satellites burning upon atmospheric reentry, shown below. SpaceX intentionally deploys its satellites into lower orbits between 210 and 240 kilometers “so that in the very rare case any satellite does not pass initial system checkouts it will quickly be deorbited by atmospheric drag,” the company said. “While the low deployment altitude requires more capable satellites at a considerable cost to us, it’s the right thing to do to maintain a sustainable space environment.”

The company assured that the “deorbiting satellites pose zero collision risk with other satellites and by design demise upon atmospheric reentry—meaning no orbital debris is created and no satellite parts hit the ground. This unique situation demonstrates the great lengths the Starlink team has gone to ensure the system is on the leading edge of on-orbit debris mitigation,” said SpaceX.

For every mission, the company communicates with each newly launched Starlink satellite to see if it is working properly. If the satellites do not work they intentionally deorbit it to completely burn up in the atmosphere. If everything is working well, each satellite uses onboard Krypton-powered ion thrusters to slowly raise into an operational orbit of around 550-kilometers. The satellites in higher altitudes are unaffected by the atmospheric drag caused by geomagnetic disturbances.

SpaceX said that the recent geomagnetic storm “significantly impacted” the newly launched Starlink satellites. –“[…]  Onboard GPS suggests the escalation speed and severity of the storm caused atmospheric drag to increase up to 50 percent higher than during previous launches. The Starlink team commanded the satellites into a safe-mode where they would fly edge-on (like a sheet of paper) to minimize drag—to effectively ‘take cover from the storm’—and continued to work closely with the Space Force’s 18th Space Control Squadron and LeoLabs to provide updates on the satellites based on ground radars,” the company shared in a press release. “Preliminary analysis show the increased drag at the low altitudes prevented the satellites from leaving safe-mode to begin orbit raising maneuvers, and up to 40 of the satellites will reenter or already have reentered the Earth’s atmosphere.”

Source: Sociedad de Astronomia del Caribe


Friday, December 31, 2021

Starship to be upgraded to increase LEO tonnage

 From Teslarati


SpaceX CEO Elon Musk says that future Starships – or at least certain Starship variants – are being upgraded with 50% more Raptor engines and stretched propellant tanks.

On December 17th, the CEO revealed the plans, confirming a tweet published three months prior stating that Starship was “begging for an extra 3 engines.” Musk was likely referring to the fact that a 9-engine Starship – combined with upcoming 33-engine Super Heavy boosters – would create a rocket with 42 engines, a number made famous as “the answer to the ultimate question of life [and everything]” in Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – both of which the CEO vocally enjoys. As ever, it’s thus almost impossible to tell jokes from serious, consequential plans – as is the case with Starship.

Nonetheless, origination aside, adding another three Raptor engines to Starship – boosting the count from six to nine – and stretching its tanks could be a substantial upgrade.

According to amateur modelers, who are generally able to estimate rocket performance with enough information about its structures, shape, and engines; an optimal nine-engine Starship’s tanks would be stretched about 25% to store an additional 300 tons (650,000 lb) of cryogenic liquid oxygen and methane (LOx/LCH4). That upgraded Starship would have a liftoff mass close to 1600 tons (3.5M lb) and stand about 55 meters (~180 ft) tall – 10% taller than current ships.

At stage separation, close to vacuum, a stretched Starship with three sea-level-optimized Raptors (RCs) and six vacuum-optimized Raptors (RVacs) should produce at least 2000 tons (4.4M lbf) of thrust – and possibly more than 2250 tons (~5M lbf) depending on engine performance. At that upper level of thrust, Starship – an upper stage – would be just 10% less powerful than the first stage of Falcon Heavy, the most powerful operational rocket in the world.

Regardless of its thrust, dimensions, or weight, what matters most is how a stretched, nine-engine Starship would impact that overall rocket’s launch performance. If unofficial modelers are to be believed, the results are significant: compared to a ‘normal’ Starship with a six-engine upper stage and 33-engine booster, the stretched ship could theoretically boost the amount of payload the rocket can launch to low Earth orbit (LEO) from about 150 tons to 220 tons or more (330,000 to 485,000+ lb) – an almost 50% improvement. In fact, per another recent comment from Musk indicating that Starship – unlike almost all other rockets – won’t temporarily throttle down on ascent, the total payload performance could be a bit less than 230 tons (~500,000 lb) – more than 50% greater than a shorter six-engine Starship.

If those estimates are accurate, upgrading Starship with nine Raptors and stretching its tanks is a no-brainer. It might slow development and make all nine-engine ships cost a substantial fraction more but a 50% improvement in payload performance would significantly improve the efficiency of Starship’s more ambitious Moon and Mars launch profiles, which require numerous orbital refuelings.

In effect, a 50% payload increase would allow SpaceX to complete most refueling tasks more efficiently, quickly, and cheaply. Even if the upgrade plans mean that all Starships will be stretched and carry nine Raptors, fully refueling the new Starship variant in LEO could require 7 tanker launches instead of 8-10. If SpaceX doesn’t mind maintaining multiple distinct Starship variants, which appears to be the case, then ships that are exclusively dependent on refueling (Moon and Mars landers in particular) could stay at their current size, with ~1200 tons (~2.6M lb) of propellant storage and six Raptors. A fleet of upgraded Starships could thus refuel their smaller siblings with just 5-6 tanker launches.

However, there’s a good chance that the extra mass required to stretch Starship ~5.5m (~4 tons or ~9000 lb) is minor enough that SpaceX will instead stretch all Starship variants. In fact, for variants like NASA’s HLS Moon lander and future Marsbound Starships, which depend entirely on refueling to reach their destinations, stretched tanks and more propellant storage could increase the amount of payload they could send to the Moon, Mars, and other high-energy destinations by quite a bit. Ultimately, it will be fascinating to hear more details from SpaceX and Musk on how exactly the upgraded Starship design might benefit those operations in the coming weeks and months.

Rocket payload seems to me to rise at the square of size.  A small increase in power and size produces a disproportionate increase in payload, and (since both Starship and its Super Heavy booster will be fully re-usable) a disproportionate decrease in the cost of lifting one kilogram to orbit.  Observe that the increase in fuel needed is small (25% for Starship, 10% for Super Heavy/Starship combined) relative to the 50% rise in payload.  And fuel will represent most of the cost of launching to LEO (low Earth orbit), since both booster and Starship will be re-used.  I haven't estimated how much this improvement will cut the cost of a ticket to Mars, but the decrease should be substantial.  It will also dramatically cut the cost of launching the Starlink internet satellite constellation.

Other aerospace developers spend decades designing and building new craft, and only when the new craft are in production, do they start on improvements and refinements.  SpaceX hasn't even launched either of its mammoth spacecraft to orbit, and yet it is already moving towards much lower per kilogram cost launches.  

A Starship with 3 vacuum engines being loaded onto the Super Heavy booster.
Source: Teslarati


Sunday, November 14, 2021

New Starlink satellite "dish"

 As ever, SpaceX continues race forward at the speed of light, while its competitors are still putting their shoes on.  From Teslarati.


SpaceX has launched a smaller, more compact, second-generation version of its Starlink satellite internet dish.

SpaceX said on its Starlink support page that the new dish utilizes a square-shaped design that is more compact and lighter than the previous circular dish. The new, square Starlink unit weighs just 9.2 pounds, a 42.5% reduction in weight from the first-gen model, which weighed 16 pounds in total.

The Federal Communications Commission also gave approval for SpaceX to operate the new dishes yesterday, the same day the company launched the second-gen model of its internet satellite.

SpaceX has planned for several months to launch the newly designed dish in an effort to cut production costs and increase production output. In September at the annual SATELLITE conference, SpaceX CFO Bret Johnson said that the company was manufacturing around 5,000 Starlink dishes every week, translating to an annual capacity of a quarter of a million user terminals. Johnson also gave details on the new satellite design, stating that the new dish would reduce production costs drastically. It was also a good boost to the company’s financial sheet, as the new dish costs roughly half to build compared to the first-gen model.

The new dish features a 3×3, MU-MIMO router that can transmit three bandwidth streams to three different devices. This prevents network congestion and slower speeds, which some users, unfortunately, face when crowding a single modem or transmitter device with too many internet-using pieces of technology. The previous dish only had a 2×2 MU-MIMO router, meaning the new dish can now accommodate an additional device, a huge advantage for households with multiple internet devices.

There are also improvements with the dishes’ WiFi modem’s ability to handle various weather scenarios. The new modem can now operate in temperatures as low as -22° F (-30° C) and as high as 122° F (50° C) and is completely waterproof. The first-gen model was also waterproof but only operated to function indoors between 32°F and 86°F.

The new dish does have one drawback, however, which is the absence of a built-in Ethernet port. SpaceX will sell a separate Ethernet adaptor for the dish in its online shop. “Bypass functionality is coming soon, and we are actively working on development of a Starlink mesh product,” the company’s support page said.

The price of the dish is not increasing and will remain the same at $499. The internet service is currently $99 per month.


SpaceX has been selling its satellite dishes at a loss, and this advance will allow the dish itself (as opposed to the service) to be profitable.  Expect the roll-out of Starlink to accelerate.  Starlink isn't just a global ultra-high-speed network, it's also the way SpaceX will raise enough money to fund Starship and the colonisation of Mars.



Monday, August 23, 2021

When is starlink coming to your area?

 Starlink is SpaceX's global high-speed internet, and when all the satellites are launched will allow high-speed internet even in completely uninhabited places like Antarctica and the Sahara desert.

From Inverse


At the end of July, CNBC revealed SpaceX now hosts around 90,000 users in 12 countries. The news comes a month after the firm moved past the 70,000 user mark.

The figures show the firm is increasing its subscriber count at speed, and recent comments from CEO Elon Musk suggest the firm aims to reach a staggering 500,000 users in just 12 months.

The figures show Starlink is gradually reaching more subscribers, even though it’s technically still in the beta phase. The service offers users sky-high speeds and low-latency internet access. While the current beta service offers between 100 and 200 megabits per second, a January 2021 presentation showed SpaceX’s long-term goal is to reach 10 gigabits [10,000 megabits] per second.

By comparison, Speedtest data shows the average non-mobile broadband speed in the United States is around 180 megabits per second.

The service uses SpaceX’s growing constellation of satellites to provide service. These satellites orbit much closer to the Earth than other constellations, at around 550 kilometers (340 miles) altitude. This means SpaceX requires more satellites to ensure users can maintain sight with a craft at any given time — the firm has applied for permission to launch up to 42,000 additional satellites.

Perhaps that’s just as well. SpaceX’s long-term goal is to use the finances from Starlink to fund some of its more ambitious missions, like a city on Mars. The service costs $499 upfront for a starter kit plus $99 per month thereafter, and SpaceX is expected to maintain this pricing for other countries.

The firm’s Starlink rollout has picked up speed:


  • SpaceX rolled out service to select beta testers in the United States in October 2020
  • Users in Canada and the United Kingdom received their kits by the end of 2020
  • In February 2021, Musk revealed that Starlink already had over 10,000 users
  • In March, SpaceX rolled out service to Germany and New Zealand
  • In April, Starlink reached users in Australia
  • In May, service rolled out to Belgium, the Netherlands, Austria, and France
  • In June, the service had over 70,000 users
  • In July, the service had over 90,000 users

But there are thousands more waiting for their turn. In May, SpaceX revealed during a launch livestream that over half a million people had placed an order or put down a deposit for the service.

The rollout primarily depends on two factors:


  1. The state of the satellite constellation. Does it cover my area? Is there enough capacity?
  2. The service’s status on the ground. Has it received clearance from local authorities?


SpaceX’s rollout can be rather opaque at times — Inverse regularly receives messages from readers that claim the firm is frustratingly uncommunicative. While SpaceX may officially provide service in a locality, it’s unclear when specific customers will receive their welcome package.

This cell-based Starlink coverage tracker — This shows how often each section of the world receives Starlink coverage on a given day. Dark blue means an area is covered for almost all of the day. Cells with 100 percent coverage all day have a gold star.


Starlink coverage map at 35 degrees inclination





Friday, July 2, 2021

SpaceX says Starlink can overcome plasma blackouts

 From Teslarati

SpaceX has asked the FCC to allow Starship and its Super Heavy booster to communicate with Starlink during the rocket’s first orbital launch attempt, potentially unlocking game-changing capabilities.

Filed on June 28th, SpaceX’s Special Temporary Authority (STA) application contains a number of surprising details about the company’s plans to expand the experimental use of its Starlink satellite constellation to communicate with rockets in flight. That effort was first made public in April 2021 when a separate FCC application revealed plans to test Starlink on a Starship prototype. Starship serial number 15 (now known as Ship 15 or S15).

That particular prototype became the first of its kind to successfully launch and land in one piece on May 5th. Nothing is known about whether Starlink was actually used or how the Starship’s lone dish performed during the 10 kilometer (6.2 mi) flight test, but SpaceX’s plans to again combine both two 'Star–' programs do offer some new lines to read between.'

“SpaceX intends demonstrate high data rate communications with Starship and the Super Heavy Booster on the ground at the launch site in Starbase, TX during launch, during booster recovery, in flight, and during reentry. Starlink can provide unprecedented volumes of telemetry and enable communications during atmospheric reentry when ionized plasma around the spacecraft inhibits conventional telemetry frequencies. These tests will demonstrate Starlink’s ability to improve the efficiency and safety of future orbital spaceflight missions.“

In short, in the two months since SpaceX first requested permission “to operate a single user terminal…during flight tests,” the company appears to have become extremely bullish about Starlink’s potential as a solution for rocket communications. The logical conclusion is that Starlink performed well during its trials aboard Starship S15 on the ground and in flight – possibly even exceeding SpaceX’s own expectations. Simultaneously, SpaceX is in the midst of expanding efforts to certify Starlink for aviation communications and has been generally ramping up tests on aircraft, ships, and road vehicles.

Indeed, at least in theory, the same attributes that allow Starlink to blow traditional consumer satellite communications solutions out of the water could make Starlink a boon for launch vehicle communications. That’s especially true for the test flights of experimental launch vehicles like Starship, where failure is an inevitable part of the development process. However, those launch failures are only beneficial insofar as they expand the knowledge base and allow lessons to be learned.

Data, in other words, is essential, and the more data recovered from test flights, the better. Even on modern rockets, state-of-the-art telemetry usually involves maximum bandwidth on the order of a few hundred to a few thousand kilobits per second, often requiring software and compression gymnastics and uncomfortable triage to ensure that all necessary telemetry keeps flowing.

If Starlink could expand that bandwidth from a few megabits per second (Mbps) to dozens or even hundreds of Mbps, SpaceX could extract unprecedentedly widespread and high-resolution telemetry from Starship and Super Heavy during their first orbital test flight, leaving a wealth of data for likely post-flight failure analyses.

Perhaps most surprising is SpaceX’s claim that Starlink antennas could allow Starship to maintain a strong communications link throughout orbital reentry. Traditionally, all spacecraft capable of reentry produce a superheated sheath of plasma as they careen into Earth’s upper atmosphere. That plasma effectively blocks most radio waves, creating an inevitable several-minute communications ‘blackout’ for any reentering spacecraft.

If Starlink can somehow allow SpaceX to break through that ‘plasma barrier,’ it would give the company an unprecedented capability invaluable for the process of perfecting orbital Starship reentry, descent, and landing – a process Musk expects to involve several unsuccessful attempts. According to SpaceX’s FCC application, Starship’s first orbital launch and reentry attempt could occur as early as August 2021.






Sunday, June 13, 2021

Starship to take over Starlink launches

 Here, I talked about how Starlink and Starship were linked: Starlink would provide the cash to help build Starship and Starship would be so big it could launch the thousands of satellites needed to get the Starlink's satellite constellation working.  Prophetic!  Remember, you read it here first (2017).

Now, Musk has announced that Starship will take over Starlink launches, replacing Falcon 9 in this rôle.

Since dedicated Starlink launches began in May 2019, Musk, COO and President Gwynne Shotwell, and a few other SpaceX officials and executives have made it clear that the company would ultimately transition the task of launching and maintaining the Starlink constellation from Falcon 9 to Starship. Barring major surprises, Starship is being designed to be fully and rapidly reusable from the ground up, nominally making the system far cheaper to launch.

After Musk announced a radical redesign that replaced carbon composite structures with simple steel, Starship may even be far cheaper to build than Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy – despite being several times larger, heavier, more powerful, and more capable. Despite its relative shortcomings, though, Falcon 9 has become an extraordinarily reliable and available workhorse for SpaceX and has completed 28 operational Starlink launches – delivering ~1670 satellites to orbit – since November 2019.

However, while Falcon 9 has done and continues to do an extraordinary job of routinely launching satellites and astronauts, Starship promises to blow it out of the water. It might be several years before Starship is deemed safe and reliable enough to launch humans but SpaceX could feasibly start launching Starlink satellites on the rocket almost as soon as it begins orbital flight tests.

Thanks to the low cost of each Starlink satellite, likely now around ~$250,000, it would be surprising if SpaceX didn’t include at least a few dozen satellites in the early phases of orbital Starship flight tests – even if success is far from guaranteed. At some point, though, and perhaps quite quickly, Starship will safely make it to orbit, reenter, and touch down beside a Super Heavy booster a few times in a row, effectively demonstrating fitness to launch (uncrewed) payloads.

It could take a bit more proof to convince paying customers with satellites worth tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to entrust launch contracts to Starship but SpaceX itself – likely to be the builder and owner of the world’s largest satellite constellation for the indefinite future – has more flexibility to tailor its appetite for caution. With the capabilities Starship could feasibly offer, SpaceX might also be hard-pressed to just sit and wait.

[Read more here]

The first test flight of Starship and Super Heavy will prob'ly take place in July, though SpaceX won't try to land either vessel for re-use--both will splash down into the sea.  Could the first launch of a few Starlink satellites on Starship happen before the end of this year?  At $2 million per launch, Starship will be just 4% of the cost of a Falcon 9 launch, but will be able to launch 400 satellites at a time instead of just 60, cutting the effective launch cost of each satellite by 2 orders of magnitude.

Starlink will provide a truly global high-speed internet service, and it will change the world as well as making SpaceX the sort of cash needed to build an inter-planetary space fleet.  

The plunging cost of lifting a kilogram to orbit won't just change space.  It will change the Earth too.


Source: Neopork

Thursday, June 4, 2020

A city on Mars

Source: Inverse


A while ago, Elon Musk stated that creating a self-sustaining city on Mars would cost between $100 billion and $10 trillion, and that at a minimum, it would require 1 million tons of cargo, which means that it will have to cost as little as $100,000 per tonne to ship cargo to Mars, if this city is to be feasible.

So, let's redo the sums.  Musk has said that the cost per launch including all elements (fuel/depreciation/sunk costs) of the Starship plus its booster will be $2 million, provided both Starship and Super Heavy are fully re-usable.   According to Wikipedia, the weight of the propellant (methane plus oxygen) needed to fill Starship's tanks is 1,200 tonnes.  Each Starship will be able to lift around 150 tonnes to LEO (low earth orbit).  So that would mean that 8 launches of Starship's tanker version would be needed to provide enough propellant for one journey to Mars.  This means the cost of just getting enough propellant into orbit for a Mars mission will be $16 million.

However, the first two fleets of Starships sent to Mars won't return.  They'll be useful as habitats while surface habitats/domes/caves are built, but in any case, there won't be enough propellant to bring them all back.  Here, I estimate that 3-5 Starships will be needed just to bring the generation equipment (KRUSTY nuclear generators, solar panels and wind turbines) needed to produce the electricity to make the propellant to send one Starship home.  Each expedition will bring more generators, so the ratio of ships able to return home will rise each time.  If half the ships contain cargo or passengers, and the other half power generation equipment, it will take something like 10 expeditions, or 20 years, for enough spare generating capacity to exist on Mars to send the whole fleet of 10 ships home.  Maybe, that time line can be improved, because I'm sure colonists will quickly start making their own wind turbines and solar panels and KRUSTY nuclear generators.  All the same, in all likelihood, for the first decade or so, only some of the ships sent to Mars will return. 

Musk has said that the capital cost of each Starship will be $5 million, which won't be spread over many launches for the Mars fleet, because in the beginning they'll only be used once.  So the total cost for each ship going to Mars will be $16 million + $5 million, or $21 million.  At 150 tonnes payload, that works out to $140,000 per tonne.  Still 40% too high. 

Yet there is a very steep learning curve here.  SpaceX chose a totally unexpected material to build Starship and Super Heavy—stainless steel.  They've had to learn how to build tanks that don't rupture, a body that doesn't collapse under its own weight (the steel is just 4 millimetres thick), structures that hold up to the stresses of launch and re-entry, the Raptor engines that burn methane rather than paraffin (kerosene).  These are all totally new technologies. 

To cut costs, production has to be automated.  Musk has stated that the difficulty lies not in building one Starship (!), but in creating an assembly line that will build hundreds of Starships, efficiently and cheaply, as well as hundreds of the Raptor engines.   Building an efficient assembly line, he maintains, will be 10 times as difficult as building one Starship.  We've never had a rocket assembly line before.  Talk about a learning curve!

Perhaps the biggest cut in costs per tonne has yet to come.  Each increase in the size of the rocket causes an exponential increase in the load it can lift.  Falcon 1 (with one Merlin engine) could lift 180 kg to LEO.  Falcon 9 (with 9 Merlin engines) can lift 15,600 kg (and that's re-using the booster).  Starship's booster, Super Heavy, will lift 150 tonnes (150,000 kgs) using 25-37 Raptor engines.  Raptor engines have twice as much thrust as the Merlin, so that's equivalent to 50-74 Merlin engines.  The ratio of payload in tonnes to number of engines goes from 0.18 →1.73→2.4.  Each increase in the size of the rocket results in a more than proportionate increase in payload, and therefore a fall in cost per tonne.  Musk plans a larger version of the Starship/Super heavy combo, with a 12 metre diameter as opposed to the current 9 metres, a more than doubling of the space inside the hull.  This will increase payload to perhaps 450 tonnes, which will cut launch costs per tonne to about $100K to Mars.  My guess would be that the new giant Starship will be in operating in time for the 2027 expedition.

Who will pay for this new city, these new cities?  They will quickly start paying for themselves.  As I discuss here, the first exports will likely be tourism, both recreational and scientific.  And the settlers on Mars will start making their own hardware, because the cost of bringing stuff from Earth will be so high: solar panels, wind turbines, nuclear generators; rovers; dome construction materials; life support systems (water purification, CO2 extraction, N2 extraction); space suits; robots (for mining water and minerals, for exploration); food production.  All these will be much cheaper to make on Mars than to import.  The Mars city/cities will be a ferment of new ideas and new technologies, and some of those will be sellable—ideas/patents cost nothing to send to Earth.  The first expedition of 10 ships (cargo only) , will cost $210 million, ignoring equipment like rovers/solar panels, etc.  The crewed expedition will cost the same.  But after that cost will start to decline, as the Mars learning curve falls.  Larger Starships will take over, local enterprise starts generating income and cutting costs, infrastructure on Mars will allow Starships to be re-used.  Even without that, these sums are well within SpaceX's capacity to pay (Starlink, their high-speed broadband internet system should earn them billions annually), but it is very probable that governments, scientific organisations, millennial cults, and immigrants will be willing to pay the price of a ticket to Mars.

As I said here, the timetable still looks intact.  First cargo mission in 2022, first crewed expedition in 2025, second in 2027.  With each mission, the costs of sending one tonne of cargo or one person to Mars will fall, and as they do, the movements between the worlds will increase exponentially.  Within two decades, the Mars settlements will be paying for themselves.  And there will be thousands of Martians.

Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Finally: an uneventful Starship test!

Pressure test SN2
Source: Boca Chica Gal/NASA Space Flight via Teslarati


We all know Musk's methods by now:  test beyond breaking point, then improve, and test again, iteratively, until you get something that works.  Well, the latest Starship pressure test was 100% successful.  In fact, even better, the pressure test was conducted while the methalox tanks were being pushed up by a hydraulic jack to simulate the pressure caused by firing one raptor engine, thus showing it can handle the double stresses of rocket launch and overpressurised tanks.

Teslarati comments:

According to Elon Musk, SpaceX has successfully completed its latest Starship prototype test in a uniquely uneventful fashion, great news for the next-generation rocket’s next steps and first flight tests.

The SpaceX CEO revealed the news some 12 hours after the company wrapped up the Starship tank test at its Boca Chica, Texas facilities. Another excellent example of SpaceX’s preferred process of agile development, the test followed just nine days after the Starship SN01 prototype’s first cryogenic test unexpectedly unearthed a design flaw. SpaceX analyzed the results of Starship SN01’s unintentional launch debut and drew up plans to rapidly repurpose a Starship tank initially destined for the SN02 prototype.

By using existing hardware to test an upgraded iteration of the part that destroyed Starship SN01, SpaceX has now effectively retired the risk posed by that prior failure less than two weeks after it occurred. Elon Musk specifically noted that the former SN02 engine section “passed cryo pressure & engine thrust loads,” confirming that there was more to the exceptionally uneventful evening of March 8th than met the eye. While putting on much less of a show for local observers, this particular boring test is a great sign for the next few steps of SpaceX’s Starship development program.

Musk’s description of the test suggests that SpaceX’s intention with the SN02 test tank – built in just two weeks – was to stress it up to (and likely beyond) the pressures and mechanical stresses Starship engine sections will need to survive in flight. In simpler terms, they likely tried to burst the tank by pressurizing it with liquid nitrogen, a supercool cryogenic fluid. It’s unclear exactly how far SpaceX pushed the tank, but it’s safe to say that it went at least as high as past test tanks, meaning 7-8.5 bar or 100-125 psi. At a bare minimum, a test that failed to reach Starship’s minimum flight pressure of 6 bar (90 psi) would be of dubious value for the actual orbital ship.

A step further, SpaceX installed a hydraulic jack underneath the test tank in a bid to simulate the stresses it would experience with a single Raptor engine. Capable of producing approximately 150-200 tons (1500-2000 kN) of thrust, even Raptor is relatively minor compared to the Starship tank’s likely ~500 metric ton (1.1 million lb) mass. Still, the fact that the SN02 test tank survived the combination of a highly pressurized tank and the simulated thrust of a Raptor engine suggests that SpaceX is now ready for a more successful repeat of Starship SN01 testing.

[Read more here]

Just a reminder: SN2's tank and hull structure was constructed in just 9 days.  SpaceX is obviously rapidly building up to its interim target of one Starship per week.  Responding to a question on Twitter, "What's the path forward now? Static fire with SN3 and hop with SN4?," Musk replied, "Static fire & short flights with SN3, longer flights with SN4, but spooling up the whole Starship/Raptor production line is really what matters."  A production line which aims to produce 50 Starships a year at a cost of just $5 million each.  The low cost is only possible through using an assembly line.

What will all those Starships be used for?   Originally, when Starship (then the BFS) was first proposed, Musk said that 6 ships would be needed for the first expedition to Mars.  But if the new stainless steel Starship costs just $5 million, about one tenth of the cost of a carbon-fibre composite BFS, 60 ships could be sent for the same cost (there's additional fuel cost, but it is small in the context of the capital costs.)  Even if these Starships are just used once, to fly to Mars, the total capital cost would be just $250 million.  Of course, there will also be the Super Heavy first stages, but they will be fully re-usable, so fewer of them will be needed.  (NASA's current plans to get to Mars estimate cost at $100 BILLION.  For 5 people.)

In addition, there is the point-to-point market for suborbital travel on Earth.  Most places on Earth will be about an hour apart by suborbital SpaceX Starship shuttle.  Since spaceports won't be built close to cities, because of the noise and fears about rocket ship safety, the city-centre to city-centre trips will take, say, three or four hours.  But it currently takes 14 hours to fly from New York to Beijing, 22 hours to fly to Sydney (the Australian one, not the Canadian!)   There's surely a huge market for intercontinental shuttle flights.

But wait!  Those are not all the potential markets.  Cheap launch to LEO (low Earth orbit) will mean for more space activity.  It used to cost $22,000 to lift  a single kilogram into LEO.  With the Starship/Super Heavy combo, that cost will fall to $20/kg, or lower.  Space tourism will become a thing.   And the cost won't be prohibitive.  Lifting a 100 kg person with 100 kg of food/luggage into orbit will cost just $4000.  Even with a 100% profit margin, that's still withing the range of anyone who now pays for intercontinental business class flights.  There will be millions who would like to take a "spacecation".  There will be rotating space stations for longer stays, financially feasible because of the low cost of lifting material into orbit.  And such low launch costs mean that a Moon base, or many Moon bases, will happen too.  Oh, and don't forget Starlink, SpaceX's global high speed internet service.

Just as after WW2, when air travel plunged in cost and rose in quality, leading to an explosion of passenger air traffic, so will space travel when Starship is operating.  Starship will make its own market.  Every one of the Starships SpaceX produces will be needed.   In fact, there prolly won't be enough of them!

Thursday, January 16, 2020

Starlink takes off

Source: Space.com
A view of SpaceX's first 60 Starlink satellites in orbit, still attached and awaiting deployment, after their launch on May 23, 2019.




SpaceX's Starlink satellite constellation is growing rapidly. 

Musk has said SpaceX will need at least 400 Starlink satellites in orbit for "minor" broadband coverage, and 800 satellites aloft for "moderate" coverage. The initial Starlink plan called for a megaconstellation of 12,000 satellites, and SpaceX recenty filed paperwork with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) to launch another 30,000 satellites. The ITU is a United Nations agency that manages the global satellite radio-frequency spectrum, among other things.

(Space.com)

SpaceX launched 60 Starlink satellites earlier this year, and plans to launch another 60 on the 20th of this month.   That will take its complement of satellites to 240, and with roughly 2 launches a month, it should reach 400 by the mid-March.  Starlink will offer an order of magnitude increase in download speeds compared with existing broadband networks, and will also in time cover the whole globe, including the oceans and the deserts, though to start with it'll just offer service in North America.

SpaceX has pretty much solved the launch problems.  It has cut the cost of the satellites at least five-fold, and is launching them with previously used Falcon 9s, which have fully covered their costs.  But now it needs to show that the antennas each consumer will need to connect to the satellite constellation will in fact work.  This aspect has formidable problems, since the low altitude of the satellites means they'll cross the sky in 45 minutes, and (simplifying a lot) the receiving antenna needs to be pointed towards a satellite for it to work.  See this interesting piece from Teslarati for a good explanation of the problem.

The company is also building up to a launch later this year of a manned Crew Dragon, their capsule which will allow the USA to once again launch people to the ISS, after a nine year gap when the Space Shuttle was retired.

SpaceX plans to launch its next group of Starlink broadband satellites aboard a Falcon 9 rocket as soon as Monday, Jan. 20, from Cape Canaveral, two days after the company is scheduled to launch a modified Falcon 9 booster from a separate facility at the Florida spaceport to test the Crew Dragon spaceship’s emergency escape system.

SpaceX’s ability to achieve back-to-back launch schedule hinges on several factors, including an expected test-firing in the coming days of the Falcon 9 booster slated to fly on the next Starlink launch.

But assuming everything goes according to plan, SpaceX aims to perform launches from two pads on Florida’s Space Coast as soon as Saturday and Monday.

SpaceX has already test-fired the Falcon 9 booster assigned to the Crew Dragon capsule abort test at launch pad 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center.

Technicians inside a hangar near pad 39A are attaching the Crew Dragon spaceship to the Falcon 9 rocket this week, in advance of its return to the launch complex before a countdown rehearsal Friday, during which two NASA astronauts will practice launch day procedures before climbing aboard the next Crew Dragon spaceship for a flight to the International Space Station.

The Falcon 9 is scheduled to lift off from pad 39A — without astronauts on-board — during a four-hour window opening at 8 a.m. EST (1300 GMT) Saturday. About a minute-and-a-half after launch, the first stage’s nine Merlin 1D engines will be programmed to switch off, and SuperDraco thrusters on the Crew Dragon capsule mounted atop the rocket will ignite to propel the human-rated ship away from the Falcon 9.

The maneuver will demonstrate the Crew Dragon’s ability to carry astronauts away from a launch emergency, and builds on a pad abort test in 2015 to simulate the Crew Dragon’s abort system performance during an emergency before liftoff.

SpaceX will recover the Crew Dragon capsule from the Atlantic Ocean after it splashes down under parachutes around 20 miles (32 kilometers) offshore. The Falcon 9 rocket, flying with a previously-used first stage booster, is expected to be destroyed.

Meanwhile, teams at pad 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station — located a few miles to the south of pad 39A — are preparing a separate Falcon 9 rocket for liftoff as soon as Monday, Jan. 20, sources said.

The Jan. 20 launch will haul the next batch of approximately 60 Starlink satellites into orbit for SpaceX’s global broadband Internet network. Assuming the mission remains on schedule, liftoff time Jan. 20 is expected at 12:20 p.m. EST (1720 GMT).

The two upcoming launches from Florida’s Space Coast will mark the second and third missions of the year for SpaceX, which says it could perform 35 or more launches in 2020, including flights carrying new Starlink broadband satellite into orbit as often as every two weeks.

SpaceX conducted 21 launches in 2018, the most missions in a single year in the company’s history. The company launched 13 missions last year.

[Read more here]