Showing posts with label bi-mode. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bi-mode. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Kicking fossil fuel out of industry

 From Just Have a Think





Gives an interesting perspective of just how fossil fuels are used in industry, and how we can replace almost all uses with green electricity.  As so often, up-front costs are key.  And as always, a decent carbon price would encourage a more rapid transition to carbon-free industry.

There are 4 main "sectors" where we need to de-carbonise, and they each require different solutions.  The emissions from each sector are not equal, but it helps to break down the problem like this.

  1.  Electricity generation.  This is, globally, the sector with the biggest share of emissions, but that varies a bit depending on the country.  The solutions here are obvious, and happening, though not as fast as is needed.
  2. Transport.  A mixed bag.  Land transport is moving rapidly towards zero carbon; air and sea transport still has a long way to go.
  3. Industry.  This includes steel and cement production, and chemicals and paper.  This video discusses various solutions.
  4. Food.  A combination of methane emissions by grazing animals, and deforestation to produce beef.  As big as electricity generation by many analyses, but the hardest to reduce, because people have an emotional relationship with their food.  Politicians interfere at their peril, so shy away.  Yet it is abundantly clear that something will have to be done.



Monday, November 18, 2024

NSW's bi-mode diesel/electric trains

 I've talked before about bi-mode trains.  Most 'diesel' trains are actually diesel-electric.  A diesel generator charges batteries (in the old days, lead-acid batteries, and for all I know, that may still be the case) which then drive the electric motors which turn the wheels.  Why such an apparently complicated arrangement?  It's because electric motors have a higher torque than diesel motors, and can therefore accelerate away from stations more quickly.  A bi-mode train is one that can, when it's possible, directly use electricity from an overhead wire or third rail to drive the engines, obviating the need for diesel; or can use the diesel engine when there is no electricity source.

There is also a battery-electric train, which is not quite the same thing.  This charges up its batteries whenever there is external electricity, then uses the stored power in its batteries when the wire ends.  This option, won't work, however, in places where the distance between population centres is large, such as Australia, because batteries are not yet energy-dense enough to cover long distances.  

Electric traction is the "best" for trains in terms of operating cost.  But the capital and maintenance costs are high, and so expanding electrification to the routes where there are only a few trains a day is not cost-effective.

In NSW, which is between California and Texas is size, the rail network within a couple of hundred kilometres around Sydney is electrified, but the majority (in terms of track, not population) of the state is served by diesel.  The NSW State government has started replacing aging diesel trains with bi-mode trains, which can switch between diesel(-electric) in the countryside to electric in the city.  Despite a minority of the network being electrified, the reduction in emissions is still significant. 





In the UK, Hitachi isn't just building battery-electric trains, it's also developed bi-mode trains, as this video below shows.




For long routes, bi-mode traction makes sense.  For shorter non-electrified routes, battery-electric makes sense.  It shows you that we can cut rail emissions, if only we put our minds to it.

‘UK-first’ battery train outperforms diesel





From Electrek


A “UK-first” intercity battery trial train proved that single battery technology can outperform diesel engines cost-effectively.

Hitachi Rail, Angel Trains, and TransPennine Express just wrapped up the trial, which took place in the north of England. It proved that powerful batteries offer significant benefits for emissions, fuel savings, and air quality.

Hitachi has already rolled out passenger battery trains in Japan and Europe, like the Masaccio hybrid in Italy. The intercity battery trial train in the UK demonstrated that the 700 kW battery could push the train past 75 mph and power it for over 70 km. The battery matches the weight of a diesel engine and is installed in the same undercarriage space, ensuring no risk of track degradation and no impact on the passenger environment.

The battery trial train delivered better-than-expected results in fuel savings, cutting fuel costs by 35-50%. One key way it achieved this was with an “Eco-mode” where the battery fully powered sections of the route, showing that the technology is more than ready for real-world use.

This success gives Hitachi the green light to move on to a full intercity battery-electric train, with an estimated range of 100-150 km. That would allow significant stretches of non-electrified routes to go battery-powered, avoiding the need for expensive infrastructure like overhead wires in tunnels or stations.

I put this article here because it's interesting, and suggests ways forward to cut emissions from land transport, which, including cars and light trucks, contributes roughly 20% to total greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 and nitrous oxides).  But it's not very clear, and further research didn't help.  For example, the writer talks about a 700 kW battery.  Did they mean 700 kWh, which is the measure of stored power (for example, a typical EV has 50–70 kWh of stored electricity) or what they said, 700 kW, which is a measure of output at any moment?  Also, the article gives the impression that the train was run completely on battery, than says, "“Eco-mode” where the battery fully powered sections of the route".  Does this mean that some parts of the route were not fully powered by the battery, but also used diesel?  Is this new train a hybrid?

Never mind.  The sharp drop in fuel costs (35-50%) shows that not only is the battery technology environmentally better, but it will also save money.  I've talked about bi-mode trains, which are diesel-electric when there is no overhead wire (or third rail) but switch to electric when there is an alternate power source.  Adding batteries to the mix would make these trains even more flexible, and allow them to be integrated into the train network more effectively.  I've also discussed battery-powered trains, here, and here.   I'm also going to be doing a piece on NSW's new bi-mode diesel/electric trains.  Keep an eye out for it.

I can't help thinking that a carbon tax would concentrate minds wonderfully, and we'd see much more rapid progress with battery and bi-mode trains if we had one.








Monday, March 25, 2024

Locos which keep going when the wire ends

I was doing some research on "bi-mode" or "dual-mode" locomotives, which can use both electric power from an overhead catenary, as well as diesel power.   Diesel-electric locos already use electric engines to turn the wheels: the diesel engine drives an electric generator which in turn drives the wheels.  Why this apparently inefficient arrangement?  Because an electric engine can provide full torque at zero RPM, unlike plain diesel engines, allowing for faster acceleration from stops.  

Locos which can use both diesel and electricity as energy sources are called electro-diesel locos, whereas, locos using a diesel motor to drive an electric generator are called diesel-electric.  Some diesel-electric locos also have a battery to allow for a larger power draw during acceleration.  

Obviously, if the loco is on a stretch of track where there is electric power, then it would make sense to use the electricity available to run the loco's electric engine.  That is exactly what Siemens Vectron Dual-Mode locomotives does.




From Siemens website:

 

Vectron Dual Mode – keeps going where the wire ends

The Vectron Dual Mode is the up-to-date answer to changing route requirements. The dual power locomotives unite the advantages of full-featured diesel locomotives with those of electric locomotives. This combination empowers you to respond flexibly at all times to your traction requirements – so you'll always keep moving, with or without an overhead wire.

Whenever an overhead wire is available, it should be used. Electrical operation is much more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than diesel operation. But because Germany [and the UK, Australia, the USA .....] will continue to have many non-electrified sections of track for a long time to come, many diesel locomotives still run under an overhead wire – without actually using it. This makes very little economic or ecological sense. The Vectron Dual Mode excels in both operating modes, offering a real alternative to diesel-only operation.

Whether you want to react flexibly to unplanned diversions or boost environmental performance in conurbations: the Vectron Dual Mode offers you a wealth of advantages in your day-to-day operations.

With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll handle a wide range of traction tasks much more economically than with a standard diesel locomotive. Every kilometre saves fuel, and thereby reduces energy costs. You'll also reduce the number of hours your diesel alternator set is operating. Altogether, you'll benefit from a reduction in energy and maintenance costs of up to 53%.  [The savings obviously depend on what percentage of the total network is electrified.  On the other hand, diesel locos have to keep running even when they are stationary.  Given that hybrid cars use up to 40% less fuel than petrol cars because the engines don't run when the car is stationary, and also because they recharge their battery as they slow down or go down a hill, significant energy savings appear quite possible, provided the loco also has a battery.]

The issue of environmental pollution is becoming increasingly important in cities and metropolitan areas. With the Vectron Dual Mode, you'll make an important contribution to sustainable freight transport. By taking advantage of electricity wherever possible, you reduce carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions. This lets you reduce your annual local emissions by 950t of CO2, 6t of nitrogen oxides and 37kg of particulate matter compared with a standard diesel locomotive – and significantly improve your fleet's environmental performance.  [Again, the percentage of electrified track will alter these numbers.  For example, only 10% of Australia's railway track is electrified.  However, a much larger percentage of track in urban areas and conurbations is electrified, and a larger percentage of total traffic takes place on these networks.  For example, in Victoria, V-Line trains which serve regional and country destinations travel for part of their journey on electrified tracks.  On my journeys from a provincial town 200 kms from the city into the big smoke, half the distance is electrified.]


There is another advantage.  To extend existing electrified sections, installing overhead electric wires has to be done from the edge of the existing electrification to the next station or to a depot, which makes for substantial lump-sum outlays.  In other words, it has to be done in expensive chunks.  With a bi-mode loco, electrification can proceed at, say, 5 kilometres at a time, so that the electrified network can be gradually extended over time.  The loco just keeps going under diesel power when it reaches the end of the wire.  Also, the electrified sectors don't need to be contiguous, as the diesel engine could be used across the gaps.  

A good idea.


See also:

Saturday, March 23, 2024

GWR's New Battery Powered Train

Step by step we move away from fossil fuels in railways. 

 Electrification is overall cheaper on busy lines. To date, diesel has been cheaper on less-used lines, because the higher capital cost of installing third-rail/overhead-wire technology isn't offset by the cheaper running coats of electricity.    

I've talked before about battery-powered electric trains which charge from the overhead catenary when they travel on track with electrification, allowing them to travel some way on un-electrified track. 

 Which of these alternative approaches would be better would depend on distances travelled and how fast overhead catenary-charged batteries can charge.  In Australia, for example, rural towns are much further apart than the towns served by this line in England, which are roughly 5 miles apart.   This would require more batteries, on the train and next to the track, and more charging time.  

An alternative is a locomotive which can run on either diesel or electric power, called "electro-diesel" or "bi-mode"  locos (not to be confused with diesel-electric motors), such as the new trains in NSW (which I know I wrote about here on Volewica, but have been unable to find the article)