Can China build coal plants as well as climate treaties?

 From The Age

“Trust, but verify,” said Ronald Reagan to sceptics when he negotiated with Russia to help abate an existential threat to the world in the form of nuclear weapons.

Today the existential threat is climate change, and Western sceptics are wondering if China can be trusted to work with America to avert it.

In climate circles, there is universal agreement that unless the two superpowers co-operate not only to drastically reduce their own emissions but to drive the rest of the world towards an effective global agreement, we have no chance of avoiding catastrophic climate change.

China produces a staggering 28 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions and the US 15 per cent. But there the agreement wavers.

In September last year, Chinese President Xi Jinping shocked the world by announcing at the United Nations that his country would pursue a net zero by 2060 target, putting China almost in line with the most climate-ambitious nations in the world, which have set 2050 net zero targets.

“I think it is potentially enormous — stressing both words,” Lauri Myllyvirta, lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), told The New York Times after the announcement.

But even as China was setting ambitious goals, it was also throwing up new coal-fired power plants as fast as it could, prompting sceptics to doubt China’s climate commitment and coal champions to celebrate the old fuel’s future.

Between 2015 and 2019, 360 coal plant units were added to China’s fleet, CREA reported. So far this year, the Chinese power industry has proposed 40.8 gigawatts of new coal plants – an amount comparable to the entire coal fleet of South Africa. By comparison, Australia’s largest coal-fired power station, Eraring, has a capacity of 2.8 gigawatts.

So is China serious about action on climate change? Well, maybe, say close observers.

Despite the spate of coal construction, says Myllyvirta, China has yet to violate any of its climate commitments.

“There is nothing in its international agreements that say you cannot make stupid investments,” he told the Herald and The Age, noting that under current commitments, China’s emissions are not expected to peak until the late 2020s.

Myllyvirta is one of many international observers who note that coal plant construction is used in China as much for the generation of economic stimulus as it is for generating power, with, as his recent report on the China coal boom noted, “state-owned banks that lend to state-owned utilities with little due diligence” in order to prop up GDP.

His report suggests China now has 400 GW of excess coal-fired capacity, and it charts a decline in the utilisation rates of the country’s coal fleet. “In 2019, the average thermal power plant was generating electricity at 49 per cent of capacity, down from 50 per cent in 2015 and 60 per cent in 2011,” it says.

Nonetheless, Myllyvirta is concerned that China’s coal-building binge is neither rational nor consistent with plans to rapidly decarbonise its economy.

Former prime minister and China scholar Kevin Rudd [speaks Mandarin fluently] agrees that stimulus has played some role in China’s return to coal, identifying the downturn it was seeking to buffer as preceding the COVID-19 pandemic and being related to its trade war with the US.

Nonetheless, he still sees China as a serious actor on climate change. Rudd says there has been a revolution in the way China views climate change since the failed Copenhagen climate summit 2009.

“The reason is, frankly, that they get science. I’ve been talking to Chinese political leaders and climate change officials about this for more than a decade,” Rudd says.

“To begin with, you’d get blank stares. Now, all the assumptions about both science and policy are taken as granted. And the debate [today] is about the policy practices of [decarbonising].”

According to Rudd, in recent months directives have been made from the central government to provincial leadership to halt building new coal and to plan for the decommissioning and mothballing of older power stations.

Today in China, says Rudd, the debate has moved on to whether it should end the construction of offshore coal plants via the Belt and Road Initiative.

“I don’t know which way that debate is going to resolve, because it’s foreign policy establishment, national security policy establishment versus the economic policy establishment, the climate policy establishment, and so it’s in flux,” says Rudd.

When you challenge Chinese officials on the rash of coal construction, they respond that it was necessary during the downturn but will now end, he says.

In Rudd’s estimation, China’s decision to act on climate is informed by a “brutally realist” world view.

“It’s because they’ve worked out that unless they act on climate change themselves as the world’s largest emitter by a country mile, and get the Americans to act in concert, then China’s aspirations to become a pre-eminent global great power by mid-century [will be] undermined environmentally.”

China understands, says Rudd, that unless climate change is arrested, its river systems will be completely undermined by a melted Himalayas, the north China plain will be rendered barren by water scarcity and storm intensity across south-east China will begin to wreak unprecedented havoc.

You don’t have to trust China, he says, you just have to trust China to be China.

On Friday, China released an overview of its 14th five-year plan, or economic blueprint. The document disappointed those who hoped China would commit to raising its ambitions. China recommitted to having its emissions peak by 2030 and said it would reduce its “emissions intensity”, the measure of carbon dioxide produced per unit of GDP, by 18 per cent over the period 2021 to 2025.

“In terms of the climate, initial indications from China’s 14th Five Year Plan are underwhelming and shows little sign of a concerted switch away from a future coal lock-in,” said Swithin Lui, the Climate Action Tracker’s China lead, of NewClimate Institute.

But this is not the only signal that China has made on climate recently. Last month China appointed Xie Zhenhua to be its new special climate envoy, opposite John Kerry in the US.

The men share a significant history.

Scarred by the collapse of the Copenhagen climate talks early in his presidency, Barack Obama was determined that the Paris talks in 2015 would not share the same fate.

With John Kerry as secretary of state, the Obama administration began secret talks with China a year before the summit and after painstaking negotiations announced a joint climate agreement in late 2014.

The impact of the deal announced by surprise in the lead-up to the Paris talks is hard to exaggerate. “In one move, Obama and Xi broke the logjam of climate politics,” Jairam Ramesh, an Indian economist and politician told Rolling Stone magazine at the time. “Until now, China has insisted that the US and the EU are largely responsible for climate change. But this raises the bar for other nations.”

The deal deprived climate obstructionists of the argument that there is no point in Western nations acting without China and all but assured the success of the Paris talks.

Sitting at the intersection of China’s foreign policy and domestic political establishment, known and trusted in the West, Xie is in a perfect position to negotiate a climate deal with the US that could become the foundation of a global agreement, says Rudd.

Such a deal is in China’s interests, too.

“This is not animated by some Kumbaya moment, some desire to appeal to the collective West and the wider world. It’s driven by hard science and mathematics.”

Yes, but.  If we are to have any kind of chance to prevent global temperatures rising by more than 1.5 degrees C since pre-industrial times, we need to halve emissions in the 2030s and halve them again in the 2040s.  If China's emissions won't peak until 2030, the world won't halve emissions by 2030.  China is clearly moving in the right direction: it has introduced a price on carbon, it promotes electric cars, and it is the largest investor in renewables in the world.  But at the very least, it must build no new coal power stations.

From the BBC:

China emits more greenhouse gas than the entire developed world combined, a new report has claimed.

The research by Rhodium Group says China emitted 27% of the world's greenhouse gases in 2019.

The US was the second-largest emitter at 11% while India was third with 6.6% of emissions, the think tank said.

Scientists warn that without an agreement between the US and China it will be hard to avert dangerous climate change.

China's emissions more than tripled over the previous three decades, the report from the US-based Rhodium Group added.

The Asian giant has the world's largest population, so its per person emissions are still far behind the US, but the research said those emissions have increased too, tripling over the course of two decades.