The meltdown

 By Dave Whamond

The sow

 By Adam Zyglis

The Donald

 

The bigliest secrets

By Fiona Katauskas 

Zombies

By Mike Luckovich 

Voldemort

By Mike Luckovich 

Gas was cheaper under Trump

 

Tales of horror

 By Michael de Adder

Easy to tamper with mailed ballots

A cartoon by Michael de Adder

 

Hydroxychloroquine: a 45% increase in death risk

President Cretin

From Mother Jones

“What do you have to lose?” President Donald Trump asked reporters last week while, once again, promoting the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine as a potential coronavirus treatment. 

It turns out, as experts have repeatedly warned, a whole lot.

A new Lancet study released on Friday and first reported by the Washington Post revealed that taking hydroxychloroquine to combat COVID-19 was connected to a significantly increased chance of death. The study, which examined 96,032 patients and is the largest to investigate the antimalarial drug’s potential in fighting the virus, had even more alarming news for taking hydroxychloroquine with an antibiotic, the combination once touted by Trump as a “gamechanger” in the fight against coronavirus. “For those receiving hydroxychloroquine and an antibiotic—the cocktail endorsed by Trump—there was a 45 percent increased risk of death and a 411 percent increased risk of serious heart arrhythmias,” the Post reported.

The astounding findings come on the heels of a study published last month that reported more deaths among US veterans treated with hydroxychloroquine than those who received standard care. Trump initially claimed that he hadn’t seen the veterans’ study—a curious assertion considering his aggressive campaign to promote the drug—but then on Tuesday accused the medical researchers of political motivation. “That was a false study done,” he said at a White House event. “It was given by obviously not friends of the administration.”

But you ARE a pig!

A cartoon by Pat Bagley.

The reason Trump gets such bad press is because he’s such a bad man

We need more tests

A cartoon by Rob Rogers

Hillary's final judgement

From Pat Bagley

Listen up townies

Bushfire smoke in Eden, NSW.  Source: The Guardian

The latest thing from denialists is that the Ozzie fires are caused by "greenies" not allowing burn offs.  This is comparable to Lord Cheeto's dictum that the California fires were caused because they "don't sweep the leaves off the forest floor'.  It's utter twaddle.  Anything to avoid admitting that they were wrong, that climate change is happening NOW, and is causing catastrophes.  

From a Twitter thread by Sam Connor

Listen up townies. You’re driving us nuts. Backburning is done by firefighters in a fire. Hazard reduction - ‘burn offs’, ‘controlled burns’ - is done to reduce fuel load BEFORE everything is on fire. Nobody resists it. And it’s a decision by fire control on local councils.

You just make yourselves sound ill informed when you spruik this absolute rubbish about who is making decisions about burns. Unless it’s a national park, it’s done by people from the country, in the country, of all political affiliations, in concert with each other.

It isn’t made by your ‘local greenie’ whatever that means - generally, decisions are made by the people in charge of fires in your local government authority. Including decisions about harvest bans, total fire bans, when it’s safe to burn, when you need a permit.

You’re only allowed to burn off when it’s safe. You can do it yourself (farmers set fire to stubble after cropping) or you can get your local vollies to do it. But listen, it depends on when it’s safe. If there’s a big fuel load and it’s hot and dry, then they won’t let you.

There have been many controlled burns that have gotten away from people and they have started fires.  This is not ‘arson’ but it is classified as ‘deliberately lit’.  You townies need to learn that shit too. People also light things up using machinery or angle grinders.

NONE OF THIS IS NEW. What IS new is that we have a far smaller window of opportunity to safely burn off. It used to be a far longer period of time. In Vic they did something like 30% of what they’d usually do last year because conditions. Because climate change.

The other thing is that the extended drought means everything is tinder dry. No rain means no moisture in the soil. The trees have no moisture in them. Add hot days, big fuel load, searing winds, you have a recipe for unprecedented natural disaster.

There ARE other effects that take place like fire creating their own weather systems and lightning and more fires and also a thing that’s related to no trees and lots of cleared areas but I’m pretty sure they’re too complicated for people who can’t understand ‘backburning’.

All these nasty little insinuations by people about around #ItsTheGreensFault/Greenies/ferals/badly dressed bushfire survivors/whatever aren’t evidenced by anything. Please do some reading, educate yourself or stick to saving your inner city tomato plants on your balcony.

Regards, all the pissed off people who live in bushfire regions. @ABCthedrum  can you make someone tell Australia this, I’m going mad and so is every regional person watching inner city commentary on the interwebs right now

I lived in a forest for 27 years, and I can confirm all she says.  You can't do burn-offs in mid-winter—the forest's too wet.  You can't do them is summer—it's too dry.  That leaves autumn and spring.  And in a drought year, even in autumn, the forests might be too dry.  In spring, you need careful timing.  Early on, it can still be too wet.  But it dries out very quickly.  And if there is wind, well, you have to postpone.

Here is the Green Party's statement on hazard reduction:

The Australian Greens support hazard reduction burns and backburning to reduce the impact of wildfire when guided by the best scientific, ecological and emergency service expertise. 

Attempts by right-wing pundits and politicians to place the blame on the Greens represent the worst kind of dishonest politics. The Coalition has spent six years in office ignoring the chief cause – severe climate change,

Climate change means that bushfire season is starting earlier, that forests and grasslands are drier, igniting more easily and burn more readily, and that there are more and more days of very high, severe, extreme and catastrophic fire risk. The major cause of climate change is the mining, burning and exporting of coal, oil and gas.

Leading emergency service organisations aren't just talking about fuel reduction or backburning anymore, they're talking about climate change.  The overwhelming scientific consensus is that Australia's fire season is growing longer and more intense due to the effects of climate change.

Let's deal with the real cause, shall we? CO2 and methane emissions.

President Trump and Watergate

A piece from Art Buchwald written about the scandal that brought Richard Nixon low.  Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose!

Donald Trumpkin

Eek! A mouse!

A cartoon by Christopher Weyant

Dig up some dirt

A cartoon by Adam Zyglis

Loyalty to Trump

A cartoon by Tom Toles of the Washington Post.

The Trump spin cycle

From The Nib